Residential Property Overhang in Malaysia: Patterns, Causes, and Implications: A Systematic Literature Review Approach

The Malaysian housing market has been plagued by the issue of residential property overhang, which has caused policymakers, developers, and urban planners to express worry. To find, compile, and evaluate the trends, root causes, and wider ramifications of residential property overhang in Malaysia, this study thoroughly examines the body of existing literature. The Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were used to compile relevant publications from 2000 to 2025 for a systematic literature review (SLR) that followed the PRISMA guidelines. According to this analysis, the residential property overhang in Malaysia is influenced by a few factors, such as disparities between the supply and demand for housing, speculative construction methods, affordability concerns, inefficient site selection, and regulatory restrictions. Additionally, this data highlights regional variations between states, where high-rise buildings and luxury developments are disproportionately affected. The paper outlines the socioeconomic consequences, such as urban inequality, slower market absorption rates, and a decline in investment confidence. Persistent structural disparities highlight the need for a more integrated strategy that connects market data analysis, housing policy reforms, and sustainable urban development, even in the face of many government endeavours to address this urgent issue. This study advances knowledge of this unregulated occurrence and makes recommendations for future research avenues for creating a conceptual framework that supports sensible planning and policy initiatives to stabilise the Malaysian residential real estate market.

Residential property overhang, Housing market imbalance, Systematic literature review, Urban development policy.

1. Aris, N. A. M., Fathi, M. S., Harun, A. N., & Mohamed, Z. (2020, July). Spatial Pattern of Affordability and Overhang in Selangor. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 540, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2022). Financial stability and housing affordability report 2022. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. CASP. (2018). CASP qualitative checklist. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chung, H. H. (2024). De-mystifying the Housing Overhang problem in Malaysia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 29(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Malaysia population and urbanization statistics 2024. Putrajaya: DOSM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ebekozien, A., Abdul-Aziz, A. R., & Jaafar, M. (2022). Low-cost housing demand-supply gap: Government housing planners perspective on possible solutions. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), 1736-1745. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ishak, N. F. A., Ahmad@Baharum, Z., Ting, K. H., Adnan, Y. M., & Huri, N. (2024). Secular trends in property overhang in Malaysian residential and serviced apartments. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 22(3), 394–408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ishak, N. F. A., aka Baharum, Z. A., Hwa, T. K., & Marzuki, J. (2024). A Thematic Review on Factors Influencing Property Overhang in Residential Properties in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 9(27), 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismail, N. H., Karim, M. Z. A., & Bao, H. X. (2025). Foreign Investment and Housing Market Stability in Developing Economies: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(4), 187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. NAPIC. (2024). Property market report 2024: Residential segment overview. Kuala Lumpur: National Property Information Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Property Information Centre (NAPIC). (2024). Property Market Report 2024. Valuation and Property Services Department, Ministry of Finance Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo‑Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(4), 1235–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Moher, D., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Kristjansson, E., & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non‑randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]