Residents’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Barangay Peacekeeping Action Team (BPAT): A Quantitative Study on Security, Response Time, and Community Trust

Authors

Vince Julianne A. Salcedo

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Carlos Miguel M. Martinez

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Bobby L. Docoy Jr

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Armie Lhyn D. Recla

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Dr. Junvil A. Insong

College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300247

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 3304-3311

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-11

Accepted: 2026-03-16

Published: 2026-04-02

Abstract

This study examined residents’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the Barangay Peacekeeping Action Team (BPAT) in one of the barangays in Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental, Philippines, focusing on security, response time, and community trust. A quantitative descriptive–correlational research design was employed, with 260 residents selected through simple random sampling completing a validated researcher-developed questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and Pearson correlation to assess BPAT effectiveness and the relationships among the variables.

Keywords

Barangay Peacekeeping Action Team, community trust, response time, crime prevention, public safety

Downloads

References

1. Ariel, B., Bland, M., & Sutherland, A. (2022). The effect of police presence on crime and disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boateng, F. D. (2022). Trust in the police and citizens’ willingness to report crimes in developing contexts. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 69, 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bolger, P. C., & Walters, G. D. (2020). The relationship between police procedural justice and citizen cooperation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. A. (2020). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 30(5), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1576676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Doquilla, F. L., Ayeo-eo, S. P., & Almerol, P. M. (2023). Barangay Peacekeeping Action Team of selected barangays of Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra12284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hamm, J. A., Trinkner, R., & Carr, J. D. (2020). Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward a more comprehensive model of procedural justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 69, 101703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2021). Blurring the distinction between empirical and normative legitimacy? A methodological commentary on public trust in the police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09386-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2020). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1459038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, H., & Cho, S. (2021). Policing legitimacy and citizen cooperation: The mediating role of public trust. Police Quarterly, 24(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120951766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2020). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 58(1), 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mourtgos, S. M., Adams, I. T., & Nix, J. (2020). The effect of managerial procedural justice on police officers’ trust in leadership. Police Quarterly, 23(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119896202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nalla, M. K., & Nam, Y. (2021). Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation: The role of trust in the police. Policing: An International Journal, 44(3), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-08-2020-0129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nix, J., & Wolfe, S. E. (2021). Sensitivity to the Ferguson effect: The role of managerial organizational justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 74, 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., Baek, H., & Alpert, G. P. (2020). Police research, officer-involved shootings, and community trust in law enforcement. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(3), 969–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Radburn, M., Stott, C., Bradford, B., & Robinson, M. (2022). When is policing fair? The influence of procedural justice and legitimacy on cooperation with the police. Policing and Society, 32(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1822582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schafer, J. A., Burruss, G. W., & Giblin, M. J. (2022). Community trust and perceptions of police legitimacy: The influence of transparency and accountability. Policing: An International Journal, 45(4), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2021-0138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2020). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 54(2), 456–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Taganas, M. J. F., & Gupit, E. F. E. (2025). Lived experiences of collaborative synergy in community policing: A phenomenological study of BPAT and police partnership. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.913COM0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tankebe, J., & Meško, G. (2023). Police legitimacy and public trust: Insights from comparative policing research. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 17(1), paac071. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Trinkner, R. (2021). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cooperation with police: A meta-analytic review. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-021103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yesberg, J. A., & Bradford, B. (2021). Policing fairness and public trust: The role of perceived police effectiveness. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(2), 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles