Retirees and Community Integration: Myths and Realities for Sustainable Development in Africa
Authors
Zimbabwe Open University (Zimbabwe)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500225
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 3224-3232
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-08
Accepted: 2026-04-14
Published: 2026-05-27
Abstract
Africa’s development aspirations are undermined by the persistent marginalisation of retirees, who represent a vast reservoir of skills, experience, and wisdom. This paper examines the myths and realities surrounding retirees’ roles in community integration and progressive development across Africa, with reference to global comparative contexts. Drawing on the social, economic, political, technological, and cultural dimensions of retirement, the study argues that Africa cannot fully realise its development potential, including goals articulated in Agenda 2063 and the AfCFTA framework, without meaningfully engaging older citizens. The study employed a systematic integrative review methodology based on Whittermore and Knafl’s framework, drawing on diverse qualitative and quantitative evidence. Five hundred reviews from 2000–2024 were screened, of which twelve met the inclusion criteria and were critically examined across five integrative review stages: problem identification, literature review, data evaluation, data analysis, and data presentation. The paper finds that Africa can meet its development aspirations only when all citizens, regardless of age, social, political, or economic standing, are empowered to participate through inclusive economic, political, social, and technological frameworks. Strengthening integration programmes for retirees is therefore essential for sustainable and progressive community development across the continent.
Keywords
AfCFTA, Community integration, Progressive development, Retirement, Retirees
Downloads
References
1. Atchley RC (2016). The sociology of retirement. Halsted Press, New York [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bastian H, Glasziou P, & Chalmers I.(2010). Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Börsch-Supan A. (2009). The role of institutions and health in European patterns of work and retirement. J Eur Soc Policy 19:341–358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Calvo, E. (2013). Causal effects of retirement timing on subjective physical and emotional health. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J.W (2015). Mixed Method Research. University of Michigan. New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Damman M, (2015). Missing work after retirement: the role of life histories in the retirement adjustment process. Gerontologist 55:802–813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Duberly, V. (2013). Understanding the World. Elp Publishers. Toronto. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Gayman M.D. (2013). Reciprocity between depressive symptoms and physical limitations pre- and postretirement: exploring racial differences. Ageing Health 25:555–573. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Haralambos, M &Holborn, M (2003). Sociology and Perspectives. Cuth Publisher, Chicago. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Heaven, B. (2016). Mobilising resources for well-being: implications for developing interventions in the retirement transition. Gerontologist 56:615–629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Henning, G. (2016). Continuity in well-being in the transition to retirement. GeroPsych 29:225–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Khan, G. (2016). The case for leisure education in preparation for the retirement transition. J Park Recreat Adm 32:110–127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Korindo, S.R. (2018) Psychological morbidity after job retirement: a review. Asian J Psychiatr 37:58–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Peterson,, J, (2002). The dynamic impact of retirement on health: evidence from a nationwide ten-year panel survey in Japan. Prev Med 100:287–293. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Schutte, D (2016). Planning and expectations of the retirement experience. Educ Gerontol 23:273–288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Van-Solinge H, (2008) Adjustment to and satisfaction with retirement: two of a kind. Psychol Ageing 23:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working Group on Ageing Report 1 of 2021.Published by the United Nations Express Report Publishing, 13 January 2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wang, M. (2010). Employee retirement: a review and recommendations for future investigation. J Manag 36:172–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Wong, J.D. (2017). The moderating influences of retirement transition, age, and gender on daily stressors and psychological distress. Ageing Hum Dev 85:90–107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar