Retrospective Tax Enforcement and Perceived Revenue-Generation Effectiveness of Back-Duty Audits in Southwest Nigeria

This study isolates the role of back-duty audit as a retrospective enforcement mechanism for revenue recovery in Southwest Nigeria. It draws on a 2025 survey of 374 employees of federal and state revenue authorities across Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, Oyo and Ekiti States. Still, it develops a scope distinct from broader tax-audit analyses by focusing on historical non-compliance, random and regular retrospective assessment, and the recovery implications of deeper audit intensity. Item-level descriptive statistics show the strongest support for organising random back-duty assessments (mean = 3.2326, SD = .8425) and regular assessments (mean = 3.0963, SD = .8390), while auditing doubtful exclusion from the tax base receives the lowest mean (2.4759, SD = 1.1500). Back-duty audit has the largest bivariate association with reported revenue generation among the three audit modes (r = .373, p < .001). In a multiple regression controlling for desk and field audits, it remains the dominant predictor (B = .313, SE = .046, standardised beta = .346, t = 6.839, p < .001). The internally reconciled overall model is significant, F(3, 370) = 23.125, p < .001, with R² = .158 and adjusted R² = .151. The paper interprets back-duty audit as a revenue-recovery mechanism with a plausible deterrence role rather than merely an exercise in historical correction. Consistent with recent evidence on audit scope, compliance-risk management and digital enforcement, retrospective audits are expected to be more effective when they are risk-targeted, sufficiently comprehensive, linked to collection processes and supported by integrated information systems (Kotsogiannis et al., 2024; OECD, 2024; OECD et al., 2025). These findings have particular relevance to Nigeria’s current tax-reform transition. The Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025 commenced on 26 June 2025 and establishes uniform procedures intended to facilitate tax compliance and optimise tax revenue, while the Federal Ministry of Finance’s 2026 transition guidelines address the movement from the repealed tax laws to the new tax framework from 1 January 2026 (Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2025; Federal Ministry of Finance, 2026).

Accounting, Financial Studies, Auditing

1. Abdulrasaq, M., & Babatunde, A. A. (2024). Tax enforcement strategy: The antidote to non-tax compliance in North-West Nigeria. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 14(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2024.14.1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adegboye, A. A., & Adekanla, A. O. (2023). Tax compliance attitudes in Africa: How important is natural resource endowment? Journal of Economic Development, 48(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2023.48.2.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Advani, A., Elming, W., & Shaw, J. (2023). The dynamic effects of tax audits. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anjarwi, A. W. (2026). The digital transformation of tax audits: How AI, big data, blockchain, and advanced analytics are reshaping tax evasion detection. Journal of Business Analytics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2026.2644363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ayoola, T. J., Olaniyi, O. O., Kolawole, P. E., Aregbesola, O. D., & Wright, O. (2023). Tax administration, trust in tax authorities, and personal income tax compliance: Evidence from Nigeria. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(1).2023.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balán, P., Bergeron, A., Tourek, G., & Weigel, J. L. (2022). Local elites as state capacity: How city chiefs use local information to increase tax compliance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. American Economic Review, 112(3), 762–797. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Basri, M. C., Felix, M., Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2021). Tax administration versus tax rates: Evidence from corporate taxation in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 111(12), 3827–3871. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Battaglini, M., Guiso, L., Lacava, C., Miller, D. L., & Patacchini, E. (2025). Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing. Journal of Econometrics, 249, 105847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bjørneby, M., Alstadsæter, A., & Telle, K. (2021). Limits to third-party reporting: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in Norway. Journal of Public Economics, 203, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Clifford, S., & Mavrokonstantis, P. (2021). Tax enforcement using a hybrid between self- and third-party reporting. Journal of Public Economics, 203, 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Costa, F. de C. L., Martinez, A. L., & Klann, R. C. (2026). Temporal dynamics of tax avoidance: Impacts of tax audits in Brazil. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 60, 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2026.100760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ezekiel, O., Florence, I. A., & Adeniran, G. B. (2022). Tax audit and investigation: A panacea to increase revenue generation in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 13(18). https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA/13-18-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Federal Ministry of Finance. (2026, June 18). Federal Government issues transition guidelines for Tax Acts 2025. https://finance.gov.ng/ministry/federal-government-issues-transition-guidelines-for-tax-acts-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2025). Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025, Act No. 5. Federal Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Inegbedion, H., & Okoye-Uzu, C.-S. (2024). Tax audit on tax revenue of SMEs in Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1603. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03709-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Isimoya, O. A. (2022). Tax compliance and revenue generation in Lagos State. Nigerian Journal of Risk and Insurance, 12(1), 183–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kogueda, F. B. A. (2026). Tax revenue mobilisation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does the independence of the tax administration matter? Public Administration and Development, 46(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Konda, L., Patel, E., & Seegert, N. (2022). Tax enforcement and the intended and unintended consequences of information disclosure. Journal of Public Economics, 212, 104690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kotsogiannis, C., Salvadori, L., Karangwa, J., & Mukamana, T. (2024). Do tax audits have a dynamic impact? Evidence from corporate income tax administrative data. Journal of Development Economics, 170, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kotsogiannis, C., Salvadori, L., Karangwa, J., & Murasi, I. (2025). E-invoicing, tax audits and VAT compliance. Journal of Development Economics, 172, 103403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kurauone, O., Kong, Y., Sun, H., Muzamhindo, S., Famba, T., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). The effects of International Financial Reporting Standards, auditing and legal enforcement on tax evasion: Evidence from 37 African countries. Global Finance Journal, 49, 100561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lediga, C., Riedel, N., & Strohmaier, K. (2026). Tax enforcement spillovers: Evidence from business tax audits in South Africa. The Economic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Løyland, K., Raaum, O., Torsvik, G., & Øvrum, A. (2024). Evaluating compliance gains of expanding tax enforcement. Economica, 91(361), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mackenzie, O. K., Jansen, A., & Siebrits, K. (2023). Assessing the efficiency of tax administration in Africa. Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 46(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2022.2158123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mascagni, G., & Nell, C. (2022). Tax compliance in Rwanda: Evidence from a message field experiment. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 70(2), 587–623. https://doi.org/10.1086/713929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mersha, S. Z., Belaye, A. B., & Gobena, L. B. (2022). Determinants of tax audit quality with audit process as the mediator in Ethiopia: The case of the Ministry of Revenues. Management & Accounting Review, 21(1), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.24191/MAR.V21i01-08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nurebo, B. Y., Tarakegn, G., & Gutu, E. (2021). Effect of tax audit on the taxpayers’ compliance: A case of Ethiopian Ministry of Revenue, Hawassa and Jimma branches. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 26(2), APST-26-02-10. https://doi.org/10.14456/apst.2021.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Tax administration 2024: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2d5fba9c-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, African Union Commission, & African Tax Administration Forum. (2024). Revenue statistics in Africa 2024: Facilitation and trust as drivers of voluntary tax compliance in selected African tax administrations. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/78e9af3a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Monetary Fund, Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations, & Intra-European Organisation of Tax Administrations. (2025). VITARA reference guide: The audit program. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3c674401-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pitan, O. O., Aminu, I. Y., & Ene, J. C. (2025). Effect of tax audit on tax compliance in Nigeria. Journal of Global Accounting, 11(5), 195–211. https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/joga/article/view/7109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Salawu, M. K., Adigun, O. A., Lawal, Q. A., & Olaleye, J. A. (2025). Electronic tax filing system and compliance among small and medium-sized enterprises in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 15(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.17309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shah, J. (2026). Using computerized information to enforce VAT: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Development Economics, 178, 103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Slemrod, J. (2019). Tax compliance and enforcement. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(4), 904–954. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20181437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wu, X., Ying, S. X., You, J., Wu, X., & Wu, H. (2026). The effect of big data-driven tax enforcement on audit pricing: Evidence from China. The British Accounting Review, 58(1), 101531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Correlation of Marketing Strategies and Financial Performance of Motor Parts Businesses in the City of Mati
• The Role of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in Enhancing Financial Transparency and Efficiency in the Emerging Market
• Exploring Intention among Universiti Teknologi Mara Terengganu Community to Donate into Education Waqf Fund
• Utilizing AHP Method to Rank Preference of Waqf Fund Usage for UiTM Terengganu, Malaysia
• The Influence of Portfolio Diversification on Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Banks on the Ghana Stock Exchange