Revitalising Traditional Weaving Craft through Digital Learning: A Need Analysis of Youth Engagement and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

Authors

Siti Zuraida Maaruf

Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Malaysia)

Nur Adibah Abdul Ghani

Sekolah Kebangsaan Lemoi, D/A Ppd Cameron Highlands, 39000 Tanah Rata, Pahang (Malaysia)

Noor Farhani Othman

Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Malaysia)

Siti Zurina Maaruf

Kolej Tingkatan Enam, No. 26, Jalan Timun 24/1, Seksyen 24, 40300 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Malaysia)

Akmal Ahamed Kamal

Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0610

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 8273-8282

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-20

Accepted: 2026-09-25

Published: 2026-10-05

Abstract

Traditional weaving, once a vital form of cultural expression, is experiencing declining interest among younger generations. This study, “Examining Youth Engagement with Traditional Weaving Craft Through Web-Based Interactive Learning Modules” addresses this issue through the integration of contemporary educational technologies and principles of culturally responsive pedagogy. Grounded in the work of Gloria Ladson-Billings (2021) and Geneva Gay (2018), the study emphasizes the importance of connecting learners’ cultural backgrounds with instructional practices to enhance engagement and relevance. The research examines youths’ perceptions of weaving, the development of interactive learning activities based on traditional patterns and motifs from diverse tribal cultures. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining surveys and semi-structured interviews to assess participants’ interest and knowledge levels. An interactive, web-based module educational tool will design by incorporating multimedia elements such as videos, slideshows, and exercises to present the cultural significance and design complexity of traditional weaving. The integration of culturally responsive content alongside digital media enhances students’ understanding, cultural awareness, and appreciation of traditional crafts. The study concludes that technology-enhanced, culturally responsive learning modules can play a significant role in revitalising traditional weaving by making it more meaningful and accessible to younger audiences. It recommends expanding culturally grounded content and conducting longitudinal research to examine long-term impacts on educational outcomes and cultural sustainability.

Keywords

Traditional Weaving Craft, Cultural Awareness, Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Young Generation, Visual Art Education

Downloads

References

1. Adamson, G. (2021). Craft: An American history. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dormer, P. (2020). The culture of craft: Status and future (Rev. ed.). Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Efland, A. D. (2022). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum (Updated ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Freedman, K. (2023). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hashim, N. H., & Noor, S. M. (2022). Traditional crafts and cultural sustainability in Malaysia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2021-0145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jia, Y. P., & Nasri, N. M. (2019). A systematic review: Competence of teachers in implementation of culturally responsive pedagogy. Creative Education, 10(12), 3118–3130. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kumar, V., & Sharma, R. (2022). Digital learning environments and student engagement in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6789–6805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, J., & Kang, H. (2023). The role of supplementary learning materials in skill-based education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(2), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (3rd ed.). Jossey-BassJohn Ruskin. (2018). The stones of Venice (Reprint ed.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1851–1853) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Maaruf, S. Z. (2019). Learning by nature: The implementation and evaluation of culturally responsive pictorial module of nature tie-dye batik craft. Social and Management Research Journal, 16(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v16i2.7067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Maaruf, S. Z., Mohd Nazir, M. A. N., Maaruf, S. Z., Kamal, A. A., & Redzuan, R. S. (2025). Cultural threads: Iban weaving and its impact on culturally responsive art education practices. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(8), 5475–5482. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.908000443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohamad Nasri, N., Nasri, N. F., & Abd Talib, M. A. (2021). Regional contextualization of culturally responsive online distance pedagogy (CRODP) among Southeast Asian higher educators. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4395–4406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1967407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rahman, N. A., Ismail, R., & Yusuf, N. (2024). Digital preservation of intangible cultural heritage: A study on traditional crafts in Southeast Asia. Sustainability, 16(2), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16021123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rahim, N., & Ismail, M. (2020). Students’ engagement in cultural heritage learning through digital platforms. International Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 145–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Smith, A., Brown, L., & Taylor, J. (2020). Usability of educational technology in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 150, 103858. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Smith, J. A. (2022). Youth engagement and the sustainability of traditional crafts in the digital era. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2021-0178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tan, K., & Nasir, N. M. (2018). Cultural heritage awareness among youth in digital learning contexts. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 15(2), 55–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNESCO. (2023). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage through education: Toolkit for educators. https://ich.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles