Role of Artificial Intelligence in Analysing and Monitoring Reputation of University's Ranking in North Central Nigeria

Authors

Dagba, B. J

Department of Mass Communication Nasarawa State University, Keffi (Nigeria)

Inyommom, A. E

Department of Agribusiness, Joseph sarwuan Tarka University makurdi (Nigeria)

Ekpah, M

Department of mass communication, Moses Adasu university, Makurdi (Nigeria)

James, A. J.

Department of Mass Communication Nasarawa State University, Keffi (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400427

Subject Category: Mass Communication

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 6008-6021

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-18

Accepted: 2026-04-23

Published: 2026-05-13

Abstract

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has emerged as a critical strategy for enhancing institutional performance, reputation, and competitiveness. In Nigeria, universities face increasing pressure to improve research output, operational efficiency, and stakeholder engagement, all of which influence national and international ranking. This study examines the role of AI in analysing and monitoring the reputation and ranking of the University of Agriculture, Makurdi, with the objective of assessing the effect of AI tools for data analysis and performance monitoring on university ranking and the extent to which AI-driven reputation and sentiment analysis influences stakeholders’ perceptions. The study is anchored on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which posits that perceived usefulness and ease of use determine the adoption of technology and its subsequent impact on organisational outcomes. A documentary research design was adopted, utilizing secondary data including administrative records, published ranking reports, AI implementation documents, and stakeholder feedback from 2019 to 2024. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative insights from reports were subjected to thematic content analysis. Findings indicate that AI adoption has significantly improved research productivity, administrative efficiency, and national ranking, demonstrating a positive relationship between AI tools and institutional performance metrics. Similarly, AI-based reputation and sentiment analysis enhanced stakeholder perception, with measurable improvements in student satisfaction, alumni engagement, and public/media sentiment, resulting in a strengthened institutional reputation. Based on these findings, the study recommends sustained investment in AI infrastructure, capacity-building initiatives for staff, and the implementation of comprehensive AI-driven reputation management systems to optimise institutional performance and stakeholder engagement. The study concludes that AI is a strategic tool for advancing both tangible outcomes such as ranking and intangible outcomes such as reputation in Nigerian universities.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, university ranking, reputation management, sentiment analysis, higher education.

Downloads

References

1. Abubakar, I., Musa, A., & Bello, T. (2022). Digital engagement and university reputation in Nigeria: Opportunities and challenges. African Journal of Higher Education Research, 12(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullahi, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in university management: Opportunities and challenges in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Technology in Africa, 14(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinlade, T., & Bello, S. (2022). Digital transformation and AI adoption in Nigerian universities. African Journal of Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 23–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bowen, G. A. (2020). Documentary research: A practical guide. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(3), 225–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). AI-driven analytics in higher education: A global perspective. International Journal of Educational Data Science, 6(3), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dake, D. K., & Gyimah, E. (2022). Using sentiment analysis to evaluate qualitative students’ responses. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4629–4647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eze, P., & Adeyemi, T. (2023). Enhancing university rankings in Nigeria through data analytics. Nigerian Journal of Educational Management, 10(1), 60–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Global university rankings and the rise of reputation metrics. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hazelkorn, E. (2019). Global university rankings and the politics of higher education: Understanding the influence and impact. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibrahim, R. (2023). Sentiment analysis and AI in Nigerian higher education. Journal of African Educational Technology, 8(2), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jiang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Determinants of university reputation in a competitive higher education landscape. Journal of Educational Management, 14(2), 77–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khumalo, P. (2021). AI applications in South African universities: Monitoring reputation and rankings. South African Journal of Educational Innovation, 12(4), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khaiser, F. K., Saad, A., & Mason, C. (2023). Sentiment analysis of students’ feedback on institutional facilities using text based classification and NLP. Journal of Language and Communication, 10(1), 101–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kshetri, N. (2018). Data analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Global Information Technology, 11(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, S., Roy, P. P., Dogra, D. P., & Kim, B.-G. (2023). A comprehensive review on sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Marginson, S. (2021). Global trends in university rankings and reputation. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 4–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Munyai, M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of AI in African higher education. African Review of Educational Technology, 6(2), 67–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Musa, A., & Garba, I. (2023). University competitiveness and AI adoption in North-Central Nigeria. Journal of Nigerian Educational Research, 15(2), 50–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. National Universities Commission (NUC). (2023). List of accredited universities in Nigeria. Abuja: NUC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nwabekee, U. S., Okpeke, F., & Onalaja, A. E. (2024). A conceptual model for AI enabled sentiment analysis: Enhancing brand reputation management in the digital age. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 8(3), 877–900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. (2022). AI in higher education: Improving performance and global competitiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Okeke, C. (2022). Digital tools and AI in Nigerian university research visibility. Journal of African Higher Education, 11(3), 77–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Okoye, F., & Olayinka, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in African universities: Current trends and challenges. African Journal of Education and Technology, 5(1), 12–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Santos, F., & Silva, M. (2020). Performance monitoring in higher education: Concepts and applications. Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shaik, T., Tao, X., Dann, C., Xie, H., Li, Y., & Galligan, L. (2023). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining on educational data: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sung, Y., Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2023). AI-enabled decision-making in universities: Global best practices. International Review of Education, 69(1), 101–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 51(2), 287–302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles