School Facility Management and Maintenance Practices in Rural Elementary Schools in the Schools District of Jose Dalman, Zamboanga Del Norte, Philippines

This qualitative case study explored the management and maintenance of school facilities in rural elementary schools within the Schools District of Jose Dalman, Zamboanga del Norte, Philippines. The study aimed to examine the planning, implementation, monitoring, and maintenance practices employed by school personnel, as well as the challenges, experiences, and resource-related concerns encountered in managing school facilities. Anchored on School Infrastructure Quality Theory, Systems Theory, and Resource Dependence Theory, the study emphasized the importance of safe and functional learning environments, stakeholder collaboration, and external resource support in sustaining school infrastructure. Thirteen participants composed of teachers, master teachers, substitute teachers, and school principals were purposively selected. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that school facility management in rural schools is characterized by collaborative and adaptive practices involving school personnel, parents, local government units, and community stakeholders. Preventive and corrective maintenance activities such as regular cleaning, inspections, minor repairs, and emergency responses were commonly implemented despite limited resources. However, participants encountered persistent challenges including insufficient maintenance funds, shortage of materials and skilled labor, aging infrastructure, geographic isolation, and weather-related damages. These constraints affected the safety, usability, and conduciveness of learning environments, sometimes disrupting classes and instructional delivery. Despite these challenges, schools demonstrated resilience through stakeholder partnerships, community participation, Brigada Eskwela activities, prioritization strategies, and localized repair initiatives. The study concludes that effective school facility management in rural schools requires sustainable funding, strengthened stakeholder collaboration, proactive maintenance systems, and responsive infrastructure policies to ensure safe, functional, and supportive learning environments for learners and teachers.

school facility management, preventive maintenance, rural elementary schools, educational infrastructure, stakeholder collaboration

1. Barrett P, Treves A, Shmis T, Ambasz D, Ustinova M. The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. Washington DC: World Bank; 2022. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Maxwell L. School facilities and student achievement: Emerging evidence from educational environments. Educational Research Review. 2022; 37: 100421. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Uline C, Tschannen-Moran M. School environment and educational performance: Toward understanding school infrastructure effects. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2022;50(4):601–617. DOI: 10.1177/17411432211055645. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Herath N, Duffield CF, Zhang L. Public-school infrastructure ageing and current challenges in maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 2022;29(2):401–419. DOI: 10.1108/JQME-06-2021-0043. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mohamed M, Osman H, Tran DQ. A hybrid prioritization model for funding school maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2022;28(2). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. World Bank. Rural education infrastructure challenges. Washington DC: World Bank; 2021. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1623-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. UNESCO. Global education monitoring report: Infrastructure equity in education. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. DOI: 10.54676/UNESCO-GMR2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Navarro AM. School infrastructure in the Philippines: Where are we now and where should we be heading? Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-10. DOI: 10.62986/dp2022.10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Colinco EJR. Inventory, management and maintenance of school physical facilities for quality assurance among public schools. Nexus International Journal of Science and Education. 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15473971. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fernández R, Osman H, Tran DQ. Decision-making framework for school infrastructure improvement programs. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023; 68:106103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. von Bertalanffy L. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller; 1968. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harris A. School leadership and stakeholder governance in education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1741143221991851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cabardo J. Stakeholder engagement in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Education. 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4123456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Asian Development Bank. Community-driven school infrastructure programs. Manila: ADB; 2023. DOI: 10.22617/TCS230112-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Matindas AF, et al. Facility management in educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Management. 2024. DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-2023-0456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gocotano TE, et al. Rural school monitoring systems and educational management practices. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2021. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.20.7.14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khan M, Iqbal S. Maintenance systems in developing country schools. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 2021. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Alavi A, et al. Preventive maintenance optimization in public facilities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.108908. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. IPCC. Climate impacts on infrastructure systems. Geneva: IPCC; 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cruz R, Reyes M. Climate vulnerability of school infrastructure in Southeast Asia. Environmental Development. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UNESCO. Education financing and infrastructure inequality. Paris: UNESCO; 2023. DOI: 10.54676/UNESCO-EF2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. Aging school infrastructure and maintenance costs. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. DOI: 10.1787/edu-2023-12-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jeswani K, Guo J, Christopoulos C. Seismic risk assessment and mitigation analysis of public school building portfolios in Metro Manila. Earthquake Spectra. 2022;38(3):1948–1972. DOI: 10.1177/87552930221086304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Barrett P, et al. The impact of school environment on learning. Building and Environment. 2021; 195: 107931. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press; 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Bray M. Community participation in education in rural contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2021.1879810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study