Self-Worth and Growth Beyond the Uniform: An Appreciative Inquiry on Career Development in the Philippine Air Force

This qualitative study focused on how Philippine Air Force (PAF) personnel perceive their careers, strengths, core values, the future of the PAF, and life after service through the use of a strengths based, Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach. The objectives were to determine what personnel love most about being in the PAF, the talents and skills they are grateful for and apply on a daily basis, the core values they most esteem and how they put them into daily practice, visions of best future they wish for the PAF, and the kind of life they desire when they retire. An AI framed open ended questionnaire was administered to 46 randomly selected officers and enlisted personnel and responses were analyzed thematically.
For what personnel love most about being in the PAF, themes of service to country and people, professional identity and pride, organizational values and culture, career growth, stability and material benefits, and the quality of the work environment and family related aspects were highlighted. Valued talents and skills acquired in the PAF were surfaced around leadership and decision making, discipline and self-management, communication and interpersonal competence, technical and professional skills, and critical, values-based application of abilities. Integrity is considered the most highly esteemed core value. Future visions of the PAF emphasized on modernization and improved air assets, professional and well-developed personnel, enhanced operational capability and credible defense, and a reliable, focused governance. While retirement desire among PAF personnel centered on simple, peaceful family-oriented lives supported by financial stability, modest entrepreneurship, faith and values centered living and, rural or nature-based settings.
Overall, the findings portray PAF service as a value driven, strengths building vocation that personnel hope to carry into post service life. The study illustrates the usefulness of integrating AI approach guided through theoretical framing such as strengths-based career development and Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS) in a military context and points to practical directions for strengths focused career, leadership, modernization and transition programs that align institutional mandates with the long-term flourishing of those who serve.

Appreciative Inquiry, Career Development, Growth

1. Allan, B. A., Batz Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1114-1150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Armed Forces of the Philippines. (2016). AFP Career Development Handbook. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnes, R. C. (2015). The new enlisted evaluation system: did the air force get it correct this time. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1040656.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 409-434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Flores, M. L. (2024). Strengthening the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ professional military education of the enlisted personnel towards performance index. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/452647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Godwin, M. (2024). Keeping up with... Appreciative inquiry. College & Research Libraries News, 85(8), 370-374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Griffith, J., & Bryan, W. R. (2016). Human resource development and learning organizations in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 42(4), 635-654. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gittell, J. H., Godfrey, M., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2020). Interprofessional teamwork and relational coordination: Improving healthcare through relationships. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(1), 1-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Keller, K. M., Robson, S., O’Neill, K., Emslie, P., Burgette, L. F., Harrington, L. M., & Curran, D. (2014). Promoting Airmen with the Potential to Lead: A Study of the Air Force Master Sergeant Promotion System. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR581/RAND_RR581.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kraimer, M., Park, Y., & Gerlach, K. (2021). Human resource development before, during, and after military service. Human Resource Development Review, 20(4), 426-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lewis, S., Passmore, J., & Cantore, S. (2016). Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to facilitate organizational development (2nd ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Strengths use and thriving at work among nurses: The mediating role of hope. BMC Nursing, 24, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01345-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Marín, M. a. F. (2019). Employee performance evaluation within the economic management system of the Spanish Air Force: development of a methodology and an optimization model. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing (pp. 448–455). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mendez, J., et al. (2025). Leading schools as complex systems: Exploring a new strengths-based inquiry system. Frontiers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Miglianico, M., Dubreuil, P., Miquelon, P., Bakker, A. B., & Martin Krumm, C. (2020). Strength use in organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 737-771. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nolan, S. T., & Overstreet, R. E. (2018). Improving How the Air Force Develops High-Potential Officers. 32(2), 21. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/scm_pubs/55/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Paiva, C. A. (2024). Formação e Aperfeiçoamento do Oficial. Revista Da UNIFA, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.22480/rev.unifa.1989.5.1007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Park, Y., Begeny, C., & colleagues. (2021). Toward a broader understanding of career shocks. Journal of Vocational Behavior. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Philippine Air Force. (2018). PAF Flight Plan. www.paf.mil.ph. https://www.paf.mil.ph/sites/default/files/2018-11/FAQ.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Philippine Air Force. (2023). PAF Citizen’s Charter Handbook, 5th ed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Positive Organizational Scholarship. (2020). An introduction to positive organizational scholarship. University of Michigan, Ross School of Business. https://positiveorgs.bus.umich.edu/an-introduction/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rennekamp, D. E. (1986). Every Supervisor’s Mission: Build Tomorrow’s Leaders.https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA168371.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Robbert, A. A., Drezner, S. M., Boon, J. E., Hanser, L., Moore, C., Scott, L., & Shukiar, H. J. (2003). Integrated Planning for the Air Force Senior Leader Workforce: Background and Methods. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2005/RAND_TR175.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Robinson, P., De Lee, N., & Carrick, D. (Eds.). (2016). Ethics education in the military. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Stavros, J. M., & Torres, C. B. (2018). Conversations worth having: Using appreciative inquiry to fuel productive and meaningful engagement. Berrett Koehler. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Trosten Bloom, A., & Lewis, S. (2020). The appreciative inquiry summit (Updated ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Van Woerkom, M., & Kroon, B. (2020). The effect of strengths-based performance appraisal on perceived supervisor support and motivation to improve performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Walumbwa, F. O., Muchiri, M. K., Misati, E., Wu, C., & Meiliani, M. (2018). Inspired to perform: A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 249-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wolfgeher, S. L. (2009). Inflation of USAF officer performance reports analyzing the organizational environment. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA514309.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
• Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
• Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement