Selling Status on Wheels: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Prestige Construction in Philippine Automobile Branding
Authors
Assistant Professor II, Tagoloan Community College (Philippines)
Assistant Professor II, Tagoloan Community College (Philippines)
Assistant Professor I, Tagoloan Community College (Philippines)
Instructor III, Tagoloan Community College (Philippines)
Instructor III, Tagoloan Community College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601242
Subject Category: Marketing
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 18048-18064
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-20
Accepted: 2026-06-25
Published: 2026-07-16
Abstract
In today’s consumer culture, automobiles are sold not only as machines of mobility but as powerful symbols of who people aspire to become. This study examined how prestige was discursively constructed in the slogans of leading automobile brands in the Philippines using Norman Fairclough Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis, interpreted through Antonio Gramsci Gramsci’s concept of cultural hegemony and Pierre Bourdieu Bourdieu’s theory of distinction and symbolic capital. The corpus consisted of slogans from ten major automobile brands operating in the Philippine market. Through textual, discursive, and social practice analyses, the study found that automobile slogans employed aspirational vocabulary, metaphorical framing, evaluative expressions, and personalization to construct vehicles as symbols of progress, ambition, sophistication, and socially desirable identity. The findings further revealed that prestige discourse was strategically produced and circulated through integrated advertising platforms and localized to resonate with Filipino values such as family advancement, responsible provision, and respectable success. Four dominant prestige discourses emerged: prestige as social advancement, aspirational identity, distinction and sophistication, and socially valued character. These discourses normalized aspirational consumption and positioned automobiles as forms of symbolic capital that communicate status, taste, and identity. The study recommends further critical examination of branding discourse across industries and media platforms to deepen understanding of how commercial language shapes cultural meanings, social aspiration, and consumer consciousness.
Keywords
Critical Discourse Analysis; Automobile Branding; Prestige Discourse; Symbolic Capital; Consumer Culture
Downloads
References
1. Aaker, D. A. (2021). Aaker on branding: The playbook for building strong brands. Morgan James Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barrero, J. (2025). A speech act analysis of taglines of brands in shaping their cultural identity. Journal of Brand Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, Article 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hernandez, R. (2022). Automobile advertisements in the Philippines: A multimodal discourse analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. De La Salle University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ikezoe, K., Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2021). The role of personal motives in determining car ownership and use. Transport Reviews, 41(6), 785–805. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. (2022). Marketing management (16th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Keller, K. L., & Swaminathan, V. (2020). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (5th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ng, C. J. W. (2018). Performing brand identity: Situating branding in discursive ideological landscapes. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(2), 147–170. doi.orgPojani, D., Balla, E., & Dhramibi, M. (2018). Cars as a status symbol: Youth attitudes toward sustainable transport in a post-socialist city. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Şahiniz, S., Ustabaş, A., & Afacan-Fındıklı, M. (2024). The effect of corporate discourses in brand awareness and legitimacy: The rhetorical analysis of an automobile brand. Asia Pacific Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., Kemper, J. A., & Rogers, B. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]