Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction of Local Government Water Providers in Selected Cities in the Philippines
Authors
State University of Northern Negros (Philippines)
(Adviser) State University of Northern Negros (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500675
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 10067-10083
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-29
Accepted: 2026-06-03
Published: 2026-06-10
Abstract
This study assessed the service quality of local government water providers and its influence on customer satisfaction in selected cities in the Philippines. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, involving 393 survey respondents and eight interview participants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. Findings revealed a moderate level of customer satisfaction, with significant differences observed across service areas, particularly in infrastructure, responsiveness, and affordability. Persistent challenges included water quality concerns, service interruptions, ineffective communication, and billing inconsistencies. Statistical analysis showed a strong positive relationship (r = 0.878, p < 0.001) between service quality and customer satisfaction. The study recommends infrastructure modernization, digitalization of billing and communication systems, and strengthened community engagement. These findings contribute to improving public water service delivery and promoting equitable and sustainable water governance.
Keywords
Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Water Providers, and Local Government Units
Downloads
References
1. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988).SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Kennedy, I. (2022).Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1), 17–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Edwin, K. (2019).Reliability and validity of research instruments. Critical Analysis of Policies on Special Education in Kenya, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhardwaj, A. (2019).Selection of sampling method in research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 8(6), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Magno, D. J. A., & Polancos, R. V. (2025).Modification of SERVQUAL model sub-dimensions for the assessment of public service quality in the Philippines. Advances in Trans-disciplinary Engineering, 35, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Nguyen, H., Vu, D., & Tuyen, P. (2023).Smart infrastructure and service satisfaction in water utilities. Journal of Service Quality and Management, 11(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ong, A. K. S., et al. (2023).Factors affecting customer satisfaction in water utility services. Heliyon, 9(3), e13798. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. UN-Water. (2023).Water security and global sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.unwater.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. World Health Organization. (2020).Guidelines on sanitation and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Doe, J., & Smith, A. (2021).Service quality assessment in water providers. Journal of Water Management, 10(3), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021).Ethical considerations in research on service quality. Journal of Public Administration, 15(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2021).Communication practices in public utility services. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 512–525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. García-López, J., Martínez, P., & Rodríguez, M. (2023).Resource optimization in water service delivery. Water Resources Management, 37(4), 1789–1805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Johnson, M., Williams, R., & Chen, K. (2023).Performance metrics in municipal water utilities. Journal of Public Works Management, 18(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Rodriguez, P., & Manuel, K. (2023).Operational flexibility in Philippine water utilities. International Journal of Water Governance, 9(3), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Reyes, M. L., & Santos, J. D. (2022).Evaluating water service safety and duration. Journal of Public Utilities, 8(2), 15–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Espina, J., & Dela Cruz, M. (2022).Accessibility and consumer satisfaction in utilities. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study