Shaping Better Ergonomic Fitness Practices with Demographic Profiling Insights

Understanding the demographic profile insights relationship with ergonomic fitness could transform workplace wellness. This research with quantitative descriptive method using survey questionnaire in a 5-point Likert scale measurement distributed to non-teaching employees of private academic institutions explored how demographic insights can shape ergonomic fitness behaviors with a view to stimulating targeted and effective strategies. Non-teaching education workers have a good cognitive ergonomic awareness through the division of mental workload and mindfulness to bolster resilience and performance. The number of moderate efforts in balancing breaks and physical activity reveals another cultural gap where strategic rest is necessary to maintain cognition. Schools are proud of their ergonomic culture, with staff embracing healthy habits and optimizing workspaces for posture. However, the moderate use of ergonomic resources and personal workplace exercises indicate missed opportunities. This presents opportunities for further refinement by enhancing awareness and support institutionally for health-focused breaks that can reduce injury, improve well-being, and increase productivity to ensure greater benefits for participants and school communities. Age and sex have a minimal impact on ergonomic fitness habits, while job classification is a strong determinant of ergonomic fitness participation. Focus on enhancing cognitive ergonomics and workplace wellbeing is necessary by offering regular training on workload management and mindfulness, supported by smart digital tools. Recognition of mental health practices and peer support networks is highly recommended. A workplace culture valuing mental rest through breaks and open conversations while promoting ergonomic fitness includes redesigning schedules for micro-breaks, physical activity, and easy access to stretch guidelines or break zones. Regular review of workload and break policies to adapt an inclusive environment that balances productivity with cognitive wellness. Approaches to ergonomics tailored to non-teaching employees enable academic workplaces to create healthier and safer environments with long-term benefits.

Ergonomics, Ergonomic Fitness Practices, Private Schools

1. Abdollahi, T., et. al., (2020). Effect of an Ergonomics Educational Program on Musculoskeletal Disorders in Nursing Staff Working in the Operating Room: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578944/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdul Latip, S. N. N., Abdul Latip, M. S., & Daniels, G. (2025). Work Ergonomics and Employee Task Performance in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry: The Moderating Role of Gender, Length of Service, and Employment Status. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2025.2460057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz Ali, N and Sreedharan, J. (2024). Ergonomic awareness and practices to prevent musculoskeletal disorder among healthcare workers in UAE: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, Volume 40, October 2024, Pages 1973-1978. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-bodywork-and-movementtherapies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrieau, K. Ergonomics Assessment in the Philippines. https://us.anteagroup.com/projects/ergonomics-assessmentphilippines#56656\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bazaluk, O., et. al. (2023). Ergonomic risk management process for safety and health at work. https:doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boonsem, A., et. al. (2022). Relationship between the factors affecting exercise behavior and physical fitness among university students. https://www.scielo.br/j/jpe/a/WZRVRLLdvDqcpSP8jLj7qyg/?format=pdf&lang=en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Physical activity facts. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/physicalactivity/facts.ht [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, S., et. al. (2023). Analysis of National physical activity and sedentary behavior policies in China. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-15865-8\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davies, K., et. al., (2023). A participatory ergonomics intervention to re-design work and improve the musculoskeletal health of paramedics: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06834-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Duffy, V. G., & Shaw, W. S. (2019). Engagement and ergonomics: a review of the literature. Work, 63(2), 227-238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Edwards, C. et. al. (2022). Ergonomics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580551/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. El-Sherbeeny, A. et. al. (2023). How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hosseini, et. al. (2023). Predictive factors of ergonomic behaviors based on social cognitive theory among women workers on assembly lines: application of Bayesian networks. https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-023-07021-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Ergonomics and Human Factors Association (2024). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of The Philippines (HFESP). https://iea.cc/member/human-factors-and-ergonomics-society-of-the-philippines-hfesp/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jasmine M, Fasna L, Chellaiyan VG, Raja VP, Ravivarman G. A study on knowledge and practice of Ergonomics among the Software Engineers in a private firm, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):42874291. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_848_20. PMID: 33110847; PMCID: PMC7586624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kgakge, K.; Chelule, P. K.; Ginindza, T. G.  Ergonomics and Occupational Health: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Nurses in a Tertiary Hospital in Botswana. Healthcare; Basel Vol. 13, Iss. 1, (2025): 83. DOI:10.3390/healthcare13010083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kraemer, K. et. al., (2020). Musculoskeletal pain and ergonomic risks in teachers of a federal institution. Retrieved from doi:10.47626/1679-4435-2020-608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mairaj, S. M. ., Hasnain, S. M. ., Hasan, A. ., Khan, L. M. ., Batool, S. ., Fatima, A. ., Ilyas, J. ., & Khan, W. A. . (2024). Enhancing Employee Retention through Ergonomic Practices: Examining the Moderating Effect of Work-Life Balance. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(3), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. McNamara TK, Pitt-Catsouphes M. Current and Emerging Trends in Aging and Work. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2020. The stickiness of quality work: Exploring relationships between the quality of employment and the intent to turnover; pp. 375–395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Middlesworth, M. (2024). The Value of Ergonomics — How Ergonomics Shapes Safety Culture. https://ergoplus.com/ergonomics-improves-safety-culture/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Monera, S. et. al., (2024). Examining the Impact of Ergonomic Practices on Physical Work Performance of Medical Workers in Public Hospitals Within Metro Manila: A Qualitative Study on Medical Personnel’s Perspectives. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803112S [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nygaard, N. et. al. (2022). Ergonomic and individual risk factors for musculoskeletal pain in the ageing workforce. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14386-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of United States (2024). Ergonomics. https://www.osha.gov/ergonomics/identify-problems [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Popova MS, Nikolova SP, Filkova SI. Demographic and Occupational Determinants of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Apr 20;10(2):137. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020137. PMID: 40566433; PMCID: PMC12015905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rhen, I. (2023). Ergonomics risk assessment methods for creating healthy work environments. Universitetsservice US-AB, Sweden 2023, ISBN: 978-91-8040-590-4. TRITA-CBH-FOU-2023:22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Santos, J.V. (2024). Evaluating Human Factors and Ergonomics: A Comprehensive Ergonomic Safety Assessment Model. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jiei/OpenAccess [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Santos W, Rojas C, Isidoro R, Lorente A, Dias A, Mariscal G, Benlloch M, Lorente R. Efficacy of Ergonomic Interventions on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3034. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093034. PMID: 40364066; PMCID: PMC12073017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sarker, S., & Khan, M. (2020). Ergonomics and its impact on productivity and employee health. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 8(1), 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tersa-Miralles,C., et. al., (2022). Effectiveness of workplace exercise interventions in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in office workers: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054288. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen2021-054288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. United States, Department of Labor (2024). Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace. https://www.osha.gov/ergonomics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wulzerbacher, S., et. al. (2020). The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions in material handling operations. Appl Ergon. 2020 May 8;87:103139. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study