Smartphone-Based Fundus Imaging: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis

Smartphone-based fundus imaging (SBFI) has emerged as a cost-effective and portable alternative to conventional fundus cameras, particularly in low-resource and underserved areas. Traditional retinal imaging systems are often expensive, bulky, and require trained specialists, limiting access to early detection of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. Although smartphones offer a practical solution due to their accessibility and compatibility with telemedicine, challenges remain in terms of image quality, standardization, and the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) models.
This study utilized a systematic review and gap analysis of existing literature on smartphone-based fundus imaging. Relevant studies were collected from electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and selected Philippine medical journals. A purposive sampling approach was applied to select studies focusing on SBFI systems, imaging techniques, and AI applications. Data were extracted using a standardized format and analyzed through descriptive and thematic methods to identify patterns, performance outcomes, and research gaps.
The findings show that SBFI can achieve diagnostic performance comparable to conventional fundus cameras, with several studies reporting high sensitivity and specificity in detecting retinal diseases. Low-cost imaging solutions, such as 3D-printed adapters and handheld lenses, demonstrated feasibility in both clinical and community settings. However, variability in image quality, limited field of view, and dependence on operator skill were consistently observed. Most studies relied on manual grading, with limited use of AI for automated analysis. Key barriers include lack of standardized imaging protocols, inconsistent image quality, and limited validation of AI models for smartphone images.
SBFI is a promising tool for expanding retinal screening in low-resource settings. However, improvements in image standardization, AI adaptability, and implementation strategies are necessary to support wider adoption.

Smartphone-based fundus imaging, retinal screening

1. Ahn, S. J., et al. (2024). Clinical applications and future directions of smartphone fundus imaging. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnosticsXXXXXXX [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. de Oliveira, J. A. E., Nakayama, L. F., Zago Ribeiro, L., de Oliveira, T. V. F., Choi, S. N. J. H., Neto, E. M., Cardoso, V. S., Dib, S. A., Melo, G. B., Regatieri, C. V. S., & Malerbi, F. K. (2023). Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening. Acta Diabetologica, 60(8), 1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02105-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Department of Health (Philippines). (2014). Republic of the Philippines, Department of Health. https://www.doh.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Duyongco, K. L. L., Arroyo, M. H., Caparas, V. J. L., & Silva, P. A. (2018). Dilated smartphone imaging for the detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy. The Medical City Journal, 1(1), 8–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Grzybowski, A., Jin, K., Zhou, J., Pan, X., Wang, M., Ye, J., & Wong, T. Y. (2024). Retina fundus photograph-based artificial intelligence algorithms in medicine: A systematic review. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 13(8), 2125–2149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-00981-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grzybowski, A., Singhanetr, P., Nanegrungsunk, O., & Ruamviboonsuk, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening using color retinal photographs: From development to deployment. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 12(3), 1419–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00691-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Iqbal, U. (2021). Smartphone fundus photography: A narrative review. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00313-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jin, K., Li, Y., Wu, H., Tham, Y. C., Koh, V., Zhao, Y., Kawasaki, R., Grzybowski, A., & Ye, J. (2024). Integration of smartphone technology and artificial intelligence for advanced ophthalmic care: A systematic review. Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research, 4(3), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2024.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kemp, O., Bascaran, C., Cartwright, E., McQuillan, L., Matthew, N., Shillingford-Ricketts, H., Zondervan, M., Foster, A., & Burton, M. (2023). Real-world evaluation of smartphone-based artificial intelligence to screen for diabetic retinopathy in Dominica: A clinical validation study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 8(1), e001491. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kurilova, V., Goga, J., Thurzo, A., Pavlovicova, J., Oravec, M., Kolar, P., & Majtanova, N. (2025). Review of smartphone deep learning applications using eye imaging diagnostic techniques in ophthalmology. IEEE Access, 13, 187410–187441. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3626696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Malerbi, F. K., Andrade, R. E., Morales, P. H., et al. (2021). Diabetic retinopathy screening using artificial intelligence and handheld smartphone-based retinal camera. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 16(3), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296820985567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nakayama, L. F., Zago Ribeiro, L., Tabuse, C. L., Malerbi, F. K., & Regatieri, C. (2025). A comprehensive review of portable retinal cameras: Technical features, AI integration, and clinical potential. AJO International, 2(4), 100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nursalamah, M., Karfiati, F., Ratnaningsih, N., & Widihastha, S. (2024). Efficacy of smartphone-based fundus photo in vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy screening: Developing country perspective. Open Ophthalmology Journal, 18, e18743641281527. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743641281527240116095349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pan, C., Leung, L. S., Blumenkranz, M. S., Myung, D. J., & Toy, B. C. (2020). Comparison of telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy by mydriatic smartphone-based vs nonmydriatic tabletop camera-based fundus imaging. JAMA Ophthalmology, 138(8), 826–833. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Penha, F. M., Priotto, B. M., Hennig, F., Przysiezny, B., Wiethorn, B. A., Orsi, J., Nagel, I. B. F., Wiggers, B., Stuchi, J. A., Lencione, D., de Souza Prado, P. V., Yamanaka, F., Lojudice, F., & Malerbi, F. K. (2023). Single retinal image for diabetic retinopathy screening: Performance of a handheld device with embedded artificial intelligence. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00477-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pieczynski, J., Kuklo, P., & Grzybowski, A. (2021). The role of telemedicine, in-home testing and artificial intelligence to alleviate an increasingly burdened healthcare system: Diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 10, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00353-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pujari, A. (2021). Smartphone ophthalmoscopy: Is there a place for it? Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 4333–4337. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S243103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pujari, A., Saluja, G., Agarwal, D., et al. (2021). Clinically useful smartphone ophthalmic imaging techniques. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 259, 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04917-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rajalakshmi, R., Prathiba, V., Arulmalar, S., et al. (2021). Review of retinal cameras for global coverage of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye, 35, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01262-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rajarajeshwari, G., & Selvi, G. C. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence for classification, segmentation, early detection, early diagnosis, and grading of diabetic retinopathy from fundus retinal images: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access, 12, 172499–172536. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3494840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shortliffe, E. H., & Cimino, J. J. (2014). Biomedical informatics: Computer applications in health care and biomedicine (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4474-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Szeliski, R. (2010). Computer vision: Algorithms and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-935-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tablante, C. V., & Iguban, E. B. (2024). Comparative efficacy of smartphone imaging with 3D-printed adaptor versus fundus camera for diabetic retinopathy screening. Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology, 49(2), 122–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Varo, R., Postigo, M., Bila, R., Díez, N., Vallés-López, R., Sitoe, A., Vitorino, P., Mucasse, C., & Chiconela, H. (2023). Evaluation of the performance of a 3D-printed smartphone-based retinal imaging device as a screening tool for retinal pathology in Mozambique. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 109(5), 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vujosevic, S., Limoli, C., Luzi, L., et al. (2022). Digital innovations for retinal care in diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetologica, 59, 1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01941-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wang, T.-W., et al. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of regulator-approved deep learning systems for fundus diabetic retinopathy detection. npj Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02223-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wintergerst, M. W. M., Keller, H., Scheler, R., et al. (2020). A novel device for smartphone-based fundus imaging and documentation in clinical practice: Comparative image analysis study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(7), e17480. https://doi.org/10.2196/17480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Health Organization. (2016). Global diffusion of eHealth: Making universal health coverage achievable. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yusuf, A. M., et al. (2022). Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK) compared with standard ophthalmic fundus camera. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0273633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition