Social Capital and Social Integration among Pakistani Migrants in Malaysia
Authors
Mohd Idham Khalil Mohamed Khamil
Department of Social Science, Centre for General Studies and Cocurricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Centre for General Studies and Cocurricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Centre for General Studies and Cocurricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang (Indonesia)
Syed Saifullah Syed Abdul Aziz
Sinar Rafiq Sdn. Bhd. 71900 Labu, Negeri Sembilan (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700158
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 2265-2274
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-08
Accepted: 2026-07-18
Published: 2026-07-27
Abstract
International migration has transformed the demographic and socio-economic landscape of many developing countries including Malaysia. While migrants contribute significantly to economic development their long-term integration into host societies remains uneven and highly dependent on social relationships beyond labour market participation. Existing migration literature generally assumes that social capital facilitates migrant integration; however, limited attention has been given to how different forms of social capital simultaneously promote and constrain integration within multicultural societies. This article examines the relationship between social capital and social integration among Pakistani migrants residing in Ayer Hitam, Johor, Malaysia. Guided by the social capital perspectives of Coleman (1988), Putnam (2000), and Woolcock (2001), this study employed a qualitative case study design involving semi-structured interviews with ten Pakistani migrants. The sample was selected using purposive sampling.Data were analyzed using thematic analysis supported by Atlas.ti. Four major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) bonding social capital as a mechanism of economic and social survival (2) selective community participation, (3) structural and socio-cultural barriers to integration and (4) negotiated integration characterized by adaptation without assimilation. The findings demonstrate that strong bonding social capital provides migrants with emotional support, employment opportunities, financial assistance and collective resilience. However, excessive dependence on intra-ethnic networks simultaneously limits opportunities to develop bridging and linking social capital with the host society and formal institutions. Consequently, although Pakistani migrants exhibit successful economic adaptation, their social integration remains partial, selective and largely instrumental. The study extends contemporary social capital theory by demonstrating that strong internal social capital does not necessarily translate into comprehensive social integration.
Keywords
Social capital, migrant integration, Pakistani migrants
Downloads
References
1. Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Devadason, E. S., & Chan, W. C. (2014). Policies and laws regulating migrant workers in Malaysia: Critical appraisal. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(1), 19–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Emmel, N. (2013). Theoretical or purposive sampling. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hussain, A., Mehdi, G., & Ismail, M. (2024). Dynamics of Malaysia-Pakistan Relations: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Challenges in the 21st Century. Global Political Review, IX(I), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2024(IX-I).03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2023). Assessment Of Causes And Contributing Factors To Migrant Workers Becoming Undocumented In Malaysia. https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl2616/files/ documents/2023-08/english_undocumented-migrant-workers-report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kaur, A. (2014). Managing labour migration in Malaysia: Foreign workers and labour market flexibility. Asian Studies Review, 38(3), 345–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lancee, B. (2010). The economic returns of immigrants' bonding and bridging social capital. Sociological Quarterly, 51(1), 106–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Penninx, R., & Garcés-Mascareñas, B. (2016). The concept of integration as an analytical tool and policy concept. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe (pp. 11–29). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kassim, A., & Mat Zin, R. (2011). Irregular Migrants and the Law. Philippine Journal of Development 38 (1-2); 85-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2008). Social networks, social support and social capital: The experiences of recent Polish migrants in London. Sociology, 42(4), 672–690. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar