Social Media as a Tool of Disaster Governance: An Analysis of Facebook-Based Government Communication in Sri Lanka
Authors
Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda (Sri Lanka)
Senior Lecturer, Department of Sinhala and Mass Communication, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601060
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 15075-15081
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-27
Published: 2026-07-11
Abstract
The increasing frequency of natural disasters has highlighted the importance of effective disaster governance and timely public communication. In Sri Lanka, government institutions have increasingly adopted social media platforms, particularly Facebook, to disseminate disaster-related information, issue early warnings, and engage with citizens during emergency situations. Despite the widespread use of Facebook for disaster communication, limited research has examined its effectiveness as a tool of disaster governance from the perspectives of Political Science and Mass Communication. This study investigates the role of Facebook-based government communication in strengthening disaster governance in Sri Lanka. Employing a qualitative research approach, the study adopts a descriptive case study design and utilizes qualitative content analysis of official Facebook pages of selected government institutions, including the Disaster Management Centre, the Department of Meteorology, and the National Building Research Organisation. Semi-structured interviews with disaster management officials and communication experts, together with documentary analysis, provide additional data for thematic analysis. The findings reveal that Facebook has become an important digital governance tool by facilitating timely dissemination of disaster warnings, improving public awareness, enhancing institutional transparency, and promoting citizen engagement. However, the study also identifies several challenges, including the spread of misinformation, unequal access to digital technologies, inconsistent communication practices, and limited institutional capacity, which reduce the overall effectiveness of Facebook-based disaster communication. The study concludes that while Facebook has considerable potential to strengthen disaster governance in Sri Lanka, its effectiveness depends on coordinated government communication strategies, improved digital infrastructure, enhanced public trust, and greater institutional responsiveness.
Keywords
Disaster Governance, Facebook, Government Communication, Social Media
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(s1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Mergel, I. (2013). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration, and transparency. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
- An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
- Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
- Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
- (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication