Social Media Exposure and Same Sex Relationships Acceptance among Senior High School Learners

The study examined the correlation between social media exposure and level of acceptance on same-sex relationships (SSR) among Senior High School learners. It utilized correlational design and thematic analysis in analyzing data from an online survey conducted among four schools in Pasacao, Camarines Sur. Specifically, this looked at: (1) demographic profile; (2) level of acceptance of SHS students in SSR; (3) level of social media exposure; (4) examination whether there is or there is no significant relationship between the level of social media exposure and the level of acceptance of SSR; and (5) reasons on how the social media affect perceptions on the SSR acceptance. It was conducted to 100 learners from two public and two private schools. This study applied Pearson correlation in determining significant relationships. Thematic analysis was applied in processing inputs on how social media affects perceptions on SSR. Results showed that (1) there were a total of 45 males and 55 females; (2) the level of acceptance came up with a weighted mean of 3.51, indicating high acceptance. (3) On the level of social media exposure, it was identified as 3.54 indicating a high or frequent social media exposure. (4) There was a 0.53 correlation meaning a moderately positive one. (5) Two themes arose: (a) expands knowledge and ideas and (b) appeals to free expression of emotions. It is recommended that these results be used for the enrichment of education programs; develop studies, policies, and paradigms focusing on the effects of social media exposure on SSR acceptance.

Social Media Exposure, Same Sex Relationships, Senior High School, Level of Acceptance, LGBTQ

1. Abad, M. (2020, June 25). 73% of Filipinos think ‘homosexuality should be accepted by society’ – report. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/nation/264862-filipinos-acceptance-homosexuality-2019-pew-research-report/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah (2015). Content and Face Validity Validation Form. Practical Research 2: Quantitative Research for Senior High School Students. Department of Education: Region 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeyemo, K. S. (2020). Filipino university students’ attitude toward sexual minorities. Journal of International Students, 10(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i1.1030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arias, E. (2019). How Does Media Influence Social Norms? Experimental Evidence on the Role of Common Knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 561–578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandola, R. J. L. (2015, August 29). Redefining Perspectives: The Philippine LGBT Community’s Fight for Equal Rights. The DEMOCRAT Volume LXIII, Issue No. I. https://issuu.com/thedemocrat/docs/the_democrat_2nd_issue_tabloid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barrot, J. S. (2020). Practical Research 2 for Senior High School (Revised Edition). C & E Publishing, Inc.: Quezon City. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bond, B. J., & Figueroa-Caballero, A. (2016). Exploring the relationship between Computer-Mediated Communication, Sexual Identity Commitment, and Well-Being among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual adolescents. Communication Research Reports, 33(4), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1224159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brakefield, T., Mednick, S. C., Wilson, H. W., De Neve, J., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Same-Sex sexual attraction does not spread in adolescent social networks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0142-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brown, R. (2012). Corrective Rape in South Africa: A Continuing Plight Despite an International Human Rights Response. 2012 Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law (Spring, 2012). Golden Gate University School of Law. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brooks, S. L. (2015). Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being? Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Burns, C. (2011). Fact Sheet: LGBT Discrimination in Higher Education Financial Aid. Center for American Progress. Retrieved last May 22, 2022. http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2011/08/pdf/lgbt_factsheet.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chi, X., & Hawk, S. T. (2016). Attitudes toward Same-Sex Attraction and Behavior among Chinese University Students: Tendencies, Correlates, and Gender Differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dayrit, J. C. S., Albao, B. T., & Cleofas, J. V. (2022). Savvy and woke: Gender, digital profile, social media competence, and political participation in gender issues among young Filipino netizens. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.966878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education (2017). Gender-Responsive Basic Education Policy. Department of Education Order No. 32, Series of 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education (2018). Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Developing Responsible Youth vs. Rising Risks. Department of Education Order No. 31, Series of 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. De Leon, J. A., & Jintalan, J. R. (2018). Accepted or not: Homosexuality, media, and the culture of silence in the Philippine society. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2018-3403-25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Downing, G. (2013). Virtual youth: non-heterosexual young people’s use of the internet to negotiate their identities and socio-sexual relations. Children’s Geographies, 11(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.743280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Elias, S., & Gurbanova, N. (2018). Relocating Gender Stereotypes Online: Critical Analysis of Sexist Hate Speech in Selected Social Media. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 228, 272–277. https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ibardeloza, K.B., Badillo, L.T., Macatangay, J.H., Dela Cruz, K.R. & Malabanan, M.P. (2022). Students' Exposure to Social Media and Their Radical Involvement on the Societal Issues in the Philippines. International Review of Social Sciences Research, Volume 2 Issue 1, pp. 47 - 60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kidd, D., & McIntosh, K. (2016). Social Media at Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 785-794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Majumdar, S., Tewatia, M., Jamkhedkar, D., & Bhatia, K. (2022). “You don’t know me so don’t try to judge me”: Gender and identity performance on social media among young Indian users. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mahin, N., Hamideh, G., & Fereshteh, G. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides Dev Med Educ, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McInroy, L. B., & Craig, S. L. (2015). Transgender representation in offline and online media: LGBTQ Youth Perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(6), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.995392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Porta, C. M., Gower, A. L., Brown, C., Wood, B. A., & Eisenberg, M. E. (2019). Perceptions of sexual orientation and gender identity Minority adolescents about labels. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919838618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. PUBLIC OPINION, PROPAGANDA, AND MASS MEDIA — Steemit. Voonaputra (2018). https://steemit.com/propaganda/@vonnaputra/public-opinion-propaganda-and-mass-media-a3877cc6f1055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Roberts, J. M. (2014). Social media and the neoliberal subject. In Policy Press eBooks (pp. 93–112). https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447308232.ch005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., Rodríguez, J. Á., Ferrándiz, D. Á., & Zurita-Ortega, F. (2021). Using chi-squared automatic interaction detection modelling to identify student opinion profiles regarding same-sex couples as a family structure. Heliyon, 7(3), e06469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Russell, S. T., & Fish, J. N. (2019). Sexual Minority Youth, Social Change, and Health: a developmental collision. Research in Human Development, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1537772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Influence of Social Media in Interpersonal Communication. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS AND RESEARCH, 38(2), 70–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tan, W. (2022). The Impact of Social Medial on Gender Inequality. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 670, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Thoreson, R. (2020, October 28). The Philippines affirmed equal rights in schools – now it should protect them. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/07/19/philippines-affirmed-equal-rights-schools-now-it-should-protect-them [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tolentino, R.M.T. (2019). A Study on the Philippine Government’s Attitude towards the LGBT Community. University of the Philippines - Manila, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Social Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. UNICEF (2016). National Baseline Study on Violence against Children: Philippines Executive Summary. Council for the Welfare of Children and UNICEF Philippines 2016. Retrieved last May 7, 2022 from that https://www.unicef.org/philippines/reports/national-baseline-study-violence-againstchildren-philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Van Der Toorn, J., Jost, J. T., Packer, D. J., Noorbaloochi, S., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). In defense of Tradition: Religiosity, conservatism, and Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage in North America. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wang, Y., Dai, Y., Li, H., & Song, L. (2021). Social media and attitude change: Information booming promote or resist persuasion? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Young adults around the world are less religious. (2018, April 26). Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/06/13/young-adults-around-the-world-are-less-religious-by-several-measures/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yu, T., Lee, N., & Chao, C. (2020). The moderating effects of young adults’ personality traits on social media immersion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study