Social Sustainability of High-Rise Living in Kolkata: An Empirical Study

Urbanisation is a global trend with rapidly increasing city populations. While high-rise apartments aren't the only solution, developing countries are quickly adopting high-rise living due to socio-political and geographical factors. The sustainability of high-rise apartments has been studied across economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The review shows that social sustainability has been less researched than economic and environmental aspects, especially in the developing world. This research seeks to find how socially sustainable high-rise apartments are in the context of the developing world, especially in Kolkata, India.
This study uses qualitative and quantitative analysis to examine social issues of high-rise living in Kolkata, comparing 61 low-rise (G+4) and 59 high-rise (G+5+) apartments. It analyzes residents' experiences based on social sustainability theories from the literature.
The empirical findings reveal a significant income disparity between high-rise and low-rise residents. The analysis shows that, on average, 79.3% of high-rise residents belong to the High Income Group (HIG), and the remaining 20.7% belong to the Middle Income Group (MIG). For low-rise apartments, on average, 70% of residents belong to MIG, and the remaining 30% belong to the Low Income Group (LIG).
The sense of community is stronger in low-rise cooperative apartments than in high-rise ones, fostering more social cohesion and trust. Popular high-rise developments in Kolkata's newer suburbs are not socially sustainable because they are unaffordable and non-inclusive. Conversely, low-rise cooperative apartments are sustainable because they are affordable, equitable, inclusive, and cohesive. The study also shows that Kolkata's religious and regional diversity does not complement social cohesion across zones.
The study concludes that while high-rise apartments are rapidly increasing in eastern Kolkata, they are not socially sustainable, serving only 8% of the population. It shows that the cooperative model of low-rise apartments is more sustainable, suggesting policies should support consolidating these societies

Social Sustainability, High-Rise, Low-Rise, Developing countries

1. Ahluwalia, M. S. (2011). Prospects and Policy Challenges in the Twelfth Plan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, M. M. & Moon, K. S. (2007). ‘Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects’, Architectural Science Review, University of Sydney, vol. 50.3, pp. 205–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Kodmany, K. (2016). Sustainable tall buildings: Cases from the global south. Archnet-Ijar International Journal of Architectural Research, 10, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Kodmany, K. (2018). The sustainability of tall building developments: A conceptual framework. Buildings, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bramley, G, Dempsey, N, Power, S & Brown, C (2006). 'What is ‘social sustainability’, and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it', in Sustainable Communities and Green Futures’ Conference, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brinkman, R. & Brinkman, J. (2002). 'Corporate power and the globalization process', International Journal of Social Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burton, E (2003). 'Housing for an Urban Renaissance: Implications for Social Equity', Housing studies, vol. 18, no. 4, 2003/07/01, pp. 537–562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Census of India (2011). Kolkata Metropolitan Population. Retrieved from https://www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/184-kolkata.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Colantonio, A. (2010). Urban social sustainability themes and assessment methods. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 163, 79-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. CTBUH 2015, Criteria for the Defining and Measuring of Tall Buildings, viewed 14 October 2015. Retrieved from http://www.ctbuh.org/HighRiseInfo/TallestDatabase/Criteria/tabid/446/language/en-GB/Default.aspx. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. CTBUH (2022). London United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Das Gupta, J. & Sivaramakrishnan, L. (2013). Urban Development and High Rise Buildings of Kolkata, Progressive Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Doyle, T. & Doyle, T. (2000). Green power: the environment movement in Australia, UNSW Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ezzy, D., Bouma, G., Barton, G., Halafoff, A., Banham, R., Jackson, R. & Beaman, L. (2020). Religious Diversity in Australia: Rethinking Social Cohesion. Religions, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ganapati, S. (2007). 'An institutional analysis of the evolution of housing cooperatives in India', Institutions and Planning, vol. 155174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gifford, R. (2007). 'The Consequences of Living in High-Rise Buildings', Architectural Science Review, vol. 50, no. 1, 2007/03/01, pp. 2-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hingorani, P. (2011). Revisiting low income housing: A review of policies and perspectives. Indian institute for human settlements, 35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Klerks, J. 2009. Shaping the high-rise framework: tall buildings policies and zoning. CTBUH Journal, 34-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. KMC (2016). Building Sanction Search. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://www.kmcgov.in/KMCPortal/jsp/BuildingPlanCaseSearch.jsp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. KMC Building Rules (2022). Municipal Commissioner’s Circular No:12 of 2021-2022. Retrieved from https://www.kmcgov.in/KMCPortal/downloads/MC_Circular_12_2021_2022.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kurzman, C. (2008). 'Introduction: Meaning-making in social movements', Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 5-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mandal, R. B. (1989). Systems of rural settlements in developing countries, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mahmood, T. (2011). Religion and the secular state: Indian perspective. India: National Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McKenzie, S. (2004). 'Social Sustainability: Towards some definitions', Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia, Magill, South Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Missimer, M, Robert, K. & Broman, G (2017). 'A strategic approach to social sustainability - Part 1: exploring the social system', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 140, Jan, pp. 32–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nobel, P (2015). (ed), The Future of the Skyscraper, Oliver Printing Co., Twinsburg, Ohio, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Oldfield, P, Trabucco, D & Wood, A (2014). Roadmap on the future research needs of tall buildings, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Chicago. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pepper, M., Powell, R. & Bouma, G. D. (2019). Social Cohesion in Australia: Comparing Church and Community. Religions, 10, 605. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Piekut, A. (2014). Book review:" Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion. Immigration, Ethnic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fractionalization and Potentials for Civic Action" by Merlin Schaeffer, Ashgate, 2014. Central [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. and Eastern European Migration Review, 3, 137-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sahu, G, Zachariah, Y & Baksi, S (2009). 'National Level Background Document on Urban Issues and Concerns: Laying Foundation for Urban India Reforms Facility (UIRF) with Focus on Small and Medium Towns in India', Mumbai: Urban India Reforms Facility, School of Habitat Studies, Tata. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schmeets, H. & Te Riele, S. (2010). A decline of social cohesion in the Netherlands? Participation and trust, 1997-2010. International Conference on Social Cohesion and Development . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. The Times of India 2022, Kolkata: KMC, fire department agree on high-rise definition. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/kmc-fire-department-agree-on-high-rise-definition/articleshow/92447163.cms. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tiwari, P., & J. Rao. (2016). ‘Housing Markets and Housing Policies in India.’ ADBI Working Paper 565. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, viewed 24 June 2020. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/publications/major-challenges-facing-small-and-medium-sizedenterprises-asia-and-solutions/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. United Nations (2019). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects 2019, Highlights, United Nations, New York, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yuen, B. & Yeh, A. G. O. (2011). High-Rise Living in Asian Cities, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. West Bengal Housing Board (2019-2020), Housing Schemes. Retrieved from http://www.wbhousingboard.in/home/housing_schemes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar