Socio-Cultural Perceptions of Technology in Regional Vocational Contexts: A Quantitative Analysis in Surigao Del Sur, Philippines

The integration of digital tools in regional vocational sectors necessitates an empirical understanding of the intersection between technological efficiency and cultural values. This study examined the perceptions of students in Surigao del Sur (N=100) toward technology as a human and cultural practice across four dimensions: vocational utility, cultural synergy, inherent risks, and identity impact. Utilizing a quantitative cross-sectional design and a 5-point Likert scale instrument, the study assessed the level of technological acceptance within a culturally dense, rural-urban transitional zone. Results indicated a high level of receptivity toward technology in vocational practices (AWM = 4.234) and a strong perceived synergy between traditional knowledge and modern automation (AWM = 4.228). However, respondents documented measured concerns regarding technology-induced deskilling and the erosion of cultural identity (AWM = 3.676). Inferential analysis revealed that occupation significantly influenced perceptions of vocational utility (p=0.007) and cultural synergy (p=0.003), while educational attainment significantly affected the perception of risks (p=0.023). The study concludes that while technology is viewed as an essential instrument for economic advancement, its acceptance in regional contexts is contingent upon its alignment with community values. These findings suggest a requirement for culturally responsive vocational training that balances digital proficiency with the preservation of tactile, ancestral knowledge.

Socio-technical integration, Vocational digital transformation, Indigenous knowledge systems, Caraga region, Digital-cultural synergy, Technological ambivalence.

1. Abad, L., & Dela Cruz, R. (2025). Regional digital divides: Socio-cultural barriers to technology adoption in the Caraga region. Philippine Social Science Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Appadurai, A. (2023). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. Verso Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brown, A., Lico, M., & Tan, R. (2026). Digital adoption and negotiated identity: Socio-technical shifts in rural labor markets. Journal of Rural Studies, 112, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.01.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Castells, M. (2021). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Information and Communications Technology [DICT]. (2023). National Digital Transformation Strategy 2022–2028. Government of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Science and Technology [DOST]. (2024). Regional innovation and technological assessment report. DOST-Caraga. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gomez, J. P., & Alieto, E. (2023). Digital proficiency as a catalyst for economic mobility: Perspectives from provincial Philippine students. Philippine Journal of Science and Technology, 14(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.5555/pjst.2023.02.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, S. Y., & Park, H. J. (2024). Defensive digital documentation: Safeguarding cultural heritage in the age of global homogenization. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(4), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.04.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, M., Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2021). Socio-technical frameworks in rural development: Bridging the gap between tradition and innovation. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Li, X., & Smith, T. J. (2022). The deskilling paradox: Agricultural mechanization and the loss of tactile knowledge. Technology in Society, 68, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Madianou, M. (2022). Technological ambivalence and the digital divide in emerging economies. New Media & Society, 24(3), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211018742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ng, K. W., Chen, L., & Wong, S. (2023). Fundamental digital literacy in globalized labor markets: A Southeast Asian perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies, 12(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-10-2022-0145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. OECD. (2023). The impact of AI and automation on regional labor markets. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/199d750d-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Critical digital literacy: A framework for the post-digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pertubal, G. (2022). Socio-cultural reception of digital tools in Mindanao: A research gap analysis. University of the Philippines Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahman, M. A. (2025). Vocational identity and the acceptance of automated tools in emerging economies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 140, 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Reyes, E., Santos, M., & Garcia, F. (2024). Demographic influences on technological acceptance in regional educational settings. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00712-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Smith, T. J. (2021). Tactile knowledge and the threat of digital displacement in traditional sectors. Technology in Society, 64, 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thang, T., & Wong, S. (2022). Digital proficiency as a driver of economic resilience in Southeast Asia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 39(2), 188–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tindowen, D. J. (2021). Leveraging technology to safeguard intangible cultural assets: Cases from indigenous communities in Northern Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(1), 154–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Van Deursen, A. J. (2023). The second-level digital divide: From access to the social consequences of digital technology use. New Media & Society, 25(8), 1950–1968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444823115160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. World Bank. (2024). Digital dividends in developing economies: 2024 update. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zhang, Y. (2023). Technological displacement and traditional wisdom: A regional assessment of the Asia-Pacific workforce. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01854-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zuboff, S. (2021). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study