Special Education Teachers’ Preparedness in Instructional Strategies in Relation to Academic Engagement of Learners’ with Special Needs

This study examined the relationships among teachers’ preparedness, instructional strategy implementation, and the academic engagement of learners with special needs in the Misamis Occidental Division during SY 2025–2026 using a descriptive-correlational design. A total of 120 purposively selected SPED teachers participated, and data were gathered using validated, researcher-made questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and Multiple Regression Analysis. Findings showed that teachers’ preparedness and instructional strategy implementation were both very high, while learners’ academic engagement was generally high. Results revealed no significant relationships between teachers’ preparedness and learners’ engagement, except for a weakly significant link between competence and emotional engagement. Likewise, instructional strategies showed no significant relationships with engagement, except for a weak significant link between inclusive teaching methods and task completion. The study concludes that although SPED teachers are highly prepared and consistently implement instructional strategies, these do not strongly translate into learners’ academic engagement. It is recommended that SPED teachers and curriculum implementers sustain current strengths while strengthening the alignment of teacher competence and inclusive teaching methods with learner engagement outcomes. Future studies are encouraged to include broader variables and contexts to further explain learner engagement in special education settings.

special education teachers, instructional strategies, teacher preparedness, academic engagement, learners with special needs

1. Adam, S. (2023). Who needs the social model of disability? Frontiers in Sociology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albert, J. R. G., Basillote, L. B., Alinsunurin, J. P., Vizmanos, J. F. V., Muñoz, M. S., & Hernandez, A. C. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 4 on quality education for all: How does the Philippines fare and what needs to be done? Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper No. DP 2023-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Almughyiri, S. (2025). Influence of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory on career choices of preservice teachers. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 29023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Benemerito, P., Delos Reyes, N. R. T., Espina, R. C., Peteros, E. D., & Sitoy, R. E. (2025). The role of professional development in enhancing pedagogical practices of teachers in inclusive classroom. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brillantes, S. M. R., & Cabasag, R. C. (2025). Inclusive learning teaching strategies: Enhancing engagement and equity in diverse classrooms. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 9(10), 432–434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dayao, C. J. M., Daligdig, J., Zoilo, N., Castro, E., Lanuza, A. L., & Regala, D. D. (2024). Unique needs of diverse learners: Practices of special education. International IT Journal of Research, 2(4), 134–143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Devi, D. S. (2023). Differentiated instruction in special education: Meeting diverse needs in the classroom. Global International Research Thoughts, 11(1), 53–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guy-Evans, O. (2025). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. Simply Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hernández-Saca, D. I., Voulgarides, C. K., & Etscheidt, S. L. (2023). A critical systematic literature review of global inclusive education using an affective, intersectional, discursive, emotive and material lens. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jazmines, N. K. C., & Caballes, D. G. (2025). Implementation and sustainability of inclusive education programs towards curriculum development framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(8), 56–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Juanzo, C. J. (2024). Inclusive education: The strategic catalyst of internationalization at a Philippine State University. Romblon State University Research Journal, 6(1), 71–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kenny, N., McCoy, S., & O’Higgins Norman, J. (2023). A whole education approach to inclusive education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Largo, M. I., Pinili, L., Mangubat, R., Calasang, V., Cabigon, A. F., & Espina, R. (2025). Assessing the role of adaptive materials in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 48–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lazaga, R. J. T. (2025). Navigating engagement, representation, and expression in inclusive learning environments. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Madhesh, A. (2023). The concept of inclusive education from the point of view of academics specializing in special education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marchan, C. B., Tenerife-Cañete, J. J., Añora, H., & Pinili, L. (2025). Instructional practices and challenges of teachers in supporting special needs students. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(3), 55–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ramilo, J. P., & Ting, M. S. (2025). Effectiveness of differentiated instruction, level of engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(2), 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Salas García, V. B., & Rentería, J. M. (2024). Students with special educational needs in regular classrooms and their peer effects. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Singh, S. (2024). Inclusive education: Promoting equity and access for students with disabilities. Global International Research Thoughts, 12(1), 30–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UNESCO. (2024). Every learner matters and matters equally: Salamanca Statement celebration. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNESCO. (n.d.). Q&A: What you need to know about inclusion in education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vergara, M., Pinili, L., Delos Reyes, N. R., Sitoy, R., Espina, R., & Saladaga, L. (2025). Teachers’ preparedness for inclusive education: Analyzing knowledge, confidence, and classroom management. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 54–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Villarente, S. V. D., Ancheta, R. A., Manalastas, R. D. C., Capuno, R. G., Delos Reyes, N. R. T., Etcuban, J. O., Manguilimotan, R. P., & Pinili, L. C. (2024). Assessment of the implementation of inclusive education for students with special needs. International Journal of Research in Special Education, 4(1), 97–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study