Standardising Tradition, Negotiating Authenticity: Institutionalising Yi Cigarette Case Dance in Contemporary China
Authors
Universiti Pendidkan Sultan Idris (China)
Universiti Pendidkan Sultan Idris (China)
Muhammad Fazli Taib bin Saearani
Universiti Pendidkan Sultan Idris (China)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-25
Accepted: 2026-07-30
Published: 2026-08-08
Abstract
When a locally variable dance enters heritage programmes and formal education, some degree of organisation is unavoidable. The difficult question is what should be organised, by whom, and with what consequences for the practice. This article examines that problem through Yi Cigarette Case Dance (YCCD), a traditional dance associated with Yi communities in Shiping County, Yunnan Province. Although YCCD was included in China’s first national list of intangible cultural heritage in 2006, its transmission still relies heavily on demonstration, participation, and the bodily judgement of experienced dancers. The article draws on interpretive ethnographic fieldwork conducted between October 2025 and June 2026. Materials include participant observation, field notes, informal conversations, local documentary and audiovisual sources, and two extended interviews with a provincial-level representative bearer whose work spans village practice, professional performance, curriculum development, and heritage education. The analysis shows that institutionalisation widened the settings in which YCCD could be taught and performed, but did not make transmission independent of practitioners. Standardisation was directed mainly towards a teachable foundation movement names, basic rhythmic patterns, short sequences, and shared teaching resources while village styles continued to be treated as meaningful variation. Practitioners judged new arrangements through rhythm, weight, coordination, use of the cigarette cases, and an overall quality described as “flavour” and “spirit”. I use bounded adaptation to describe this negotiated scope for change, and embodied authority for the socially recognised capacity to demonstrate, correct, and evaluate performance. The case suggests that safeguarding living dance depends less on choosing between institutions and communities than on how authority is negotiated across them.
Keywords
intangible cultural heritage; Yi Cigarette Case Dance; institutionalisation; standardisation; authenticity; embodied knowledge; dance heritage
Downloads
References
1. Aral, A. E. (2022). Seeing the glass half-empty: Implications for safeguarding through formal education in Türkiye. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(11–12), 1286–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2022.2153264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chan, S. C. (2023). Unequal inscriptions of the Hungry Ghosts (Yulan) Festival celebrations as in Hong Kong. China Perspectives, 132, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.14625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. China Network. (n.d.). Yi zu yanhe wu [Yi Cigarette Case Dance; project profile in Chinese]. Retrieved July 26, 2026, from https://www.ihchina.cn/project_details/12981/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Djabarouti, J. (2021). Stories of feelings and things: Intangible heritage from within the built heritage paradigm in the UK. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1798271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gao, Q., & Jones, S. (2021). Authenticity and heritage conservation: Seeking common complexities beyond the “Eastern” and “Western” dichotomy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1793377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Giese, J., & Keightley, E. (2024). Dancing through time: A methodological exploration of embodied memories. Memory Studies, 17(2), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221126611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hafstein, V. T. (2018). Making intangible heritage: El Condor Pasa and other stories from UNESCO. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv4v3086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hou, Y., Kenderdine, S., Picca, D., Egloff, M., & Adamou, A. (2022). Digitizing intangible cultural heritage embodied: State of the art. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 15(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kämpfe, V. (2023). Dance practices as research: Approaches to the safeguarding and transmission of the intangible cultural heritage of dance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30581-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Maags, C. (2023). State institutions as building blocks of China’s infrastructures of memory: The case of intangible heritage. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 52(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026221145950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Noyes, D. (2006). The judgment of Solomon: Global protections for tradition and the problem of community ownership. Cultural Analysis, 5, 27–56. https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~culturalanalysis/volume5/pdf/noyes.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Pang, S. (2013). Guojiaji feiwuzhi wenhua yichan: Shiping Yi zu yanhe wu [National intangible cultural heritage: Shiping Yi Cigarette Case Dance; in Chinese]. Yunnan University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sklar, D. (1991). On dance ethnography. Dance Research Journal, 23(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1478692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2006, May 20). Notice on the publication of the first national list of intangible cultural heritage [In Chinese]. Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China. https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/fwzwhyc/202012/t20201206_916788.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: Performing cultural memory in the Americas. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Whatley, S. (2022). Embodied cultural property: Contemporary and traditional dance practices. International Journal of Cultural Property, 29(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739122000108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. You, Z. (2015). Shifting actors and power relations: Contentious local responses to the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage in contemporary China. Journal of Folklore Research, 52(2–3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.52.2-3.253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]