Strange Exegetical Interpretations: A Critical Study in Light of the Qur’anic Text and the Prophetic Sunnah

This study examines and critically analyzes certain interpretations found in works of Qur’anic exegesis that exhibit elements of conceptual oddity or interpretive readings inconsistent with the spirit of Islam as derived from the Noble Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. Such interpretations are also at variance with the broader contextual framework of the Qur’anic discourse. The significance of this study arises from the pressing need to reassess certain interpretations found in some exegetical works that diverge from the sound meanings of the texts and, consequently, obscure the contemporary reader’s understanding of religion and the Qur’an. Accordingly, the study seeks to re-examine a number of passages that have been interpreted in ways that conflict, in particular, with the Qur’anic text itself and, more broadly, with the spirit of Islam. The study aims to highlight sound methodological frameworks for understanding the Noble Qur’an and to draw attention to the risks of interpretations that are detached from context and from the overarching meanings consistent with the spirit of Islam. The research problem lies in the absence of precise criteria among some exegetes, which at times leads to the emergence of interpretations that contradict the values and concepts established by the Qur’an and the Prophetic Sunnah. The study adopts both the descriptive and analytical approaches. The descriptive method identifies and presents to the reader selected instances of exegesis that, in our view, conflict with the Qur’anic text and the spirit of Islam in the works of some exegetes. The analytical method, on the other hand, undertakes a re-examination of those instances that are inconsistent with the spirit of Islam in general and with the Qur’anic text in particular, with the aim of producing a reading that is coherent with the sound understanding of the Qur’anic text. The study concludes with a number of findings, foremost among them identifying for the reader certain instances of Qur’anic exegesis in the works of some commentators that are inconsistent with the Qur’anic text, conceived as an integrated whole whose parts are interconnected like the organs of a single body, and that do not accord with the spirit of Islam. It further proposes a re-reading of such instances in a manner that brings them into alignment with both the Qur’anic text and the spirit of Islam.

Strangeness; Qur’anic Exegesis (Tafsīr); Critique; Qur’anic Text; Prophetic Sunnah

1. Ibn Hanbal, A. (2001). Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Beirut, Lebanon: Al-Risalah Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Jawzi, A. A. (1422 AH). Zad al-Masir fi ‘Ilm al-Tafsir. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Farahidi, K. A. (n.d.). Kitab al-‘Ayn. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Maktabat al-Hilal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Fayruzabadi, M. A. (2005). Al-Qamus al-Muhit (1426 AH ed.). Beirut, Lebanon: Al-Risalah Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Harbi, H. A. (2008). Qawa‘id al-Tarjih ‘Ind al-Mufassirin. Saudi Arabia: Dar al-Qasim. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Karmani, M. H. (n.d.). Ghara’ib al-Tafsir wa ‘Aja’ib al-Ta’wil. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Dar al-Qiblah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al-Nasafi, A. A. (1995). Madarik al-Tanzil (1415 AH ed.). Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Qurtubi, M. A. (n.d.). Al-Jami‘ li Ahkam al-Qur’an. Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-Tabari, M. J. (n.d.). Jami‘ al-Bayan ‘an Ta’wil Ay al-Qur’an. Makkah, Saudi Arabia: Dar al-Turath. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al-Shafi‘i, M. I. (1938). Al-Risalah. Cairo, Egypt: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Shatibi, I. M. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Ibn Affan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ibn Ashur, M. T. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Tunisian Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ibn ‘Atiyyah, A. H. (1422 AH). Al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-‘Aziz. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Al-Zamakhshari, M. U. (1987). Al-Kashshaf ‘an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil. Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-Rayyan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ibn Hazm, A. A. (n.d.). Al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal. Cairo, Egypt: Maktabat al-Khanji. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ibn al-Qayyim, M. A. (n.d.). Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ibn Manzur, M. M. (1414 AH). Lisan al-‘Arab. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Sader. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mujahid ibn Jabr. (1989). Tafsir Mujahid (Ed. by Dr. Muhammad Abd al-Salam Abu al-Nil, 1st ed.). Egypt: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Islami Al-Hadithah, p. 270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ibn Taymiyyah, A. H. (n.d.). Muqaddimah fi Usul al-Tafsir. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Maktabat al-Hayat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Abu Hayyan, M. Y. (1993). Al-Bahr al-Muhit. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hassan, T. (2001). Al-‘Alaqat al-Malfuzah wa al-‘Alaqat al-Malhuzah fi al-Nass al-Qur’ani. Cairo, Egypt. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yaḥyā ibn Salām ibn Abī Thaʿlabah al-Taymī bi al-Walāʾ, min Taym Rabīʿah, al-Baṣrī thumma al-Ifrīqī al-Qayrawānī. (2004). [Title of the book] (Hind Shalabi, Ed. & Trans.). Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. (Original work published 1425AH/2004). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests