Strategic Management for Inclusive Development: Advancing SDG 10 Through Equitable Resource Allocation in Urbanization

This study investigates the role of strategic management in addressing urban inequalities, with a specific focus on advancing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 10 — Reduced Inequalities. The research systematically examines systemic barriers to equitable resource allocation in urban settings, including governance inefficiencies, uneven infrastructure distribution, and persistent socio-economic disparities. Employing a narrative literature review approach, this study synthesizes selected scholarly and policy literature on strategic management, urban inequality, and equitable resource allocation, supported by illustrative examples from diverse urban contexts. Case studies were selected based on documented outcomes, geographic diversity, and policy relevance to the Global South. The review highlights the transformative potential of participatory governance models, emerging technologies such as GIS and blockchain, and multi-sectoral collaborations in promoting equity and sustainability. The research underscores the necessity of aligning urban strategies with global frameworks, including the 2030 Agenda, to reduce disparities and enhance resilience. Practical recommendations target policymakers, urban planners, and private-sector stakeholders in developing countries, emphasizing equity-driven frameworks and scalable grassroots innovations. This study contributes to academic discourse by identifying critical gaps in existing literature and advocating for interdisciplinary approaches to inclusive urban development.

Strategic Management, SDG 10, Urban Inequalities, Inclusive Development, Resource Allocation

1. Aditya, A., et al. (2023). Green bonds and urban regeneration. Journal of Sustainable Finance, 5(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsf.2023.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bagloee, S. A., Heshmati, M., Dia, H., Ghaderi, H., Pettit, C., & Asadi, M. (2021). Blockchain: The operating system of smart cities. Cities, 112, 103104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2021.103104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beyene, E., Adam, A. G., & Minale, A. S. (2023). Examining the practice of urban governance using UN-Habitat urban governance index in Gondar city, North West Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2208934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bukowski, M., & Kreissl, K. (2022). Social and climate (in-)equality perspectives within the SDGs: Introducing the inequality and poverty assessment model for a sustainable transformation of housing. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Butcher, S. (2020). Urban equality and the SDGs: Three provocations for a relational agenda. International Development Planning Review. https://doi.org/10.3828/IDPR.2021.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chitewere, T., Cornea, N., Lockyer, J., Macrorie, R., Blažek, J. M., Nelson, A., & Pickerill, J. (2023). Urban ecological futures: Five eco-community strategies for more sustainable and equitable cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Croese, S., & Duminy, J. (2022). Co-producing urban expertise for SDG localization. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2079868 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Croese, S., Oloko, M., Simon, D., & Valencia, S. C. (2021). Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Das, N., & Mondal, D. (2023). Sustainable development goal 10: Reducing inequality — Evidence from India and its states. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2023.v11i12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ebbrecht, G., & Chen, J. (2023). Data-driven analysis and optimization for urban energy systems equitable resilience. CISS Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS56502.2023.10089717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eliakimu, E., & Mans, L. (2022). Addressing inequalities toward inclusive governance for achieving One Health: A rapid review. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.755285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Essien, E. (2021). Impacts of governance toward sustainable urbanization in a midsized city: A case study of Uyo, Nigeria. Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Farnaghi, M., & Mansourian, A. (2020). Blockchain, an enabling technology for transparent and accountable decentralized public participatory GIS. Cities, 105, 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102850 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ghosh, P., Hossain, M., & Sarkar, S. (2022). Inequality among social groups in accessing improved drinking water and sanitation in India: A district-level spatial analysis. The Professional Geographer, 75, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2022.2124181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gloerich, I., de Waal, M., Ferri, G., Cila, N., & Karpinski, T. (2020). The city as a license: Implications of blockchain and distributed ledgers for urban governance. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.534942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ietto, B., Eisenhut, K., Muth, R., Rabe, J., & Tschorsch, F. (2022). Transparency in digital-citizen interfaces through blockchain technology. 2022 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/E-TEMS53558.2022.9944504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jafari, S., Naeeni, S. K., & Nouhi, N. (2024). Decision-making strategies in the allocation of educational resources. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jrmde.3.2.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kapucu, N., Beaudet, S., Chang, N., Qiu, J., & Peng, Z. (2021). Partnerships and network governance for urban food-energy-water (FEW) nexus. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1967981 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Loreti, P., Bracciale, L., Raso, E., Bianchi, G., Sanseverino, E. R., & Gallo, P. (2023). Privacy and transparency in blockchain-based smart grid operations. IEEE Access, 11, 120666–120679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mitra, B., Pham, N., Moinuddin, M., & Scheyvens, H. (2020). Applying urban nexus approach for achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nae, T., Florescu, M., & Bălășoiu, G.-I. (2024). Towards social justice: Investigating the role of labor, globalization, and governance in reducing socio-economic inequality. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Osuji, C. (2024). A call for greater transparency in resource allocation processes. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jrmde.3.2.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Parekh, P. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in funding localization of SDGs under India's Smart Cities Mission. SPAST Reports. https://doi.org/10.69848/sreports.v1i6.5078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Peng, L., Zhang, L., Li, X., Wang, P., Zhao, W., Wang, Z., & Jiao, L. (2022). Spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Petit-Boix, A., Apul, D., Wiedmann, T., & Leipold, S. (2021). Transdisciplinary resource monitoring is essential to prioritize circular economy strategies in cities. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac44c6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Purushothaman, K. E., Ganesh, V., Ragavendran, N., Uma Maheswari, G., Ramesh, S. P., & Saravanakumar, R. (2024). Innovative urban planning: Harnessing blockchain and edge AI for smart city solutions. ICoICI, 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICI62503.2024.10696745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rezende, D., Almeida, G. G. F., & Fumagalli, L. (2024). Strategic digital city: Multiple projects for sustainable urban management. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Srinivas, T. A. S., Donald, A. D., Srihith, I. D., Anjali, D., & Chandana, A. (2023). Blockchain: The future of smart city development. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-9009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wu, H. C. (2022). Priority criteria for community-based care resource allocation for health equity. Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yang, S., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., & Pereira, P. (2020). Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert's knowledge evaluation. Geography and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yu, S., Zeng, P., Xie, X., & Chen, D. (2024). Equitable evaluation of supply-demand and layout optimization of urban park green space. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria