Strategic Thinking as a Catalyst: Linking Green Competency to Green Innovation in the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector

Authors

Azmi Bin Mohamed

Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohd Tajuzzaman Hassanor

Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)

Abdul Mutalib Mohamed Azim

Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100215

Subject Category: Engineering

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 2721-2726

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-12-05

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms through which employee green competency (GC) translates into green innovation (GI) within the Malaysian manufacturing sector. It specifically investigates the dual role of strategic thinking (ST) as a mediator and moderator in the relationship between GC and GI. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted among 300-350 employees in Malaysian manufacturing firms with ISO 14001 or other green certifications. The collected data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses concerning the direct, indirect, and conditional effects among the variables. The results confirm that Green Competency positively influences both Green Innovation (β = 0.409) and Strategic Thinking (β = 0.319). Strategic Thinking, in turn, is a strong predictor of Green Innovation (β = 0.431). Crucially, the findings support the dual role of Strategic Thinking. It acts as a significant mediator, with an indirect effect of 0.137, suggesting it is a key pathway through which GC influences GI. Furthermore, Strategic Thinking positively moderates the GC-GI relationship (β = 0.227), indicating that the effect of green competencies on innovation is amplified when employees possess higher levels of strategic thinking. For manufacturing firms aiming to enhance sustainability, this research underscores the need to cultivate not only green skills but also strategic thinking capabilities among their employees. Fostering a workforce that can anticipate long-term environmental trends and align sustainability goals with innovative actions is critical for maximizing the return on investment in green competencies. This study provides a nuanced understanding of the GC-GI link by being one of the first to empirically validate the dual role of strategic thinking as both a cognitive bridge (mediator) and an amplifier (moderator). It offers a comprehensive model grounded in the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, providing actionable insights for the Malaysian manufacturing sector.

Keywords

Green Competency, Green Innovation, Strategic Thinking, Malaysian Manufacturing

Downloads

References

1. Ahmed, M., Khan, M. A., Asif, M., & El-Amir, A. (2022). Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1656–1681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2021-0382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ashraf, S. F., Li, C., Wattoo, M. U., Murad, M., & Mahmood, B. (2024). Green horizons: Unleashing green innovation through green business strategies and competencies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4233-4251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bani-Hani, J. (2021). The moderating influence of managers strategic thinking on the effect of talent management on organization core competency. Management Science Letters, 11(1), 213-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Begum, S., Ashfaq, M., Xia, E., & Awan, U. (2022). Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 580-597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149–190). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Goldman, E., & Scott, A. R. (2016). Competency models for assessing strategic thinking. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9(3), 258-280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gorondutse, A. H., Alqershi, N., Ibrahim, A. S., Abdussalam, I. I., & Salisu, I. (2024). Linking Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Strategic Thinking. Business Perspectives and Research, 22785337241255835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Imran, M., Rauf, A., & Ahmad, N. (2024). Sustainable practices in Malaysian Manufacturing: The Influence of CSR, Transformational Leadership, and Green Organizational Culture on Environmental Performance. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.03.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Qu, X., Khan, A., Yahya, S., Zafar, A. U., & Shahzad, M. (2022). Green core competencies to prompt green absorptive capacity and bolster green innovation: the moderating role of organization’s green culture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(3), 536-561. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability science, 6(2), 203-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yahya, S., Khan, A., Farooq, M., & Irfan, M. (2022). Integrating green business strategies and green competencies to enhance green innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39500-39514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles