Strategies for Improving Cost Performance through Effective Internal Stakeholder Management in Nigerian Building Construction Projects
Authors
Department of Quantity Surveying, Baze University, Abuja (Nigeria)
Department of Quantity Surveying, Baze University, Abuja (Nigeria)
Department of Quantity Surveying, Baze University, Abuja (Nigeria)
Department of Quantity Surveying, Baze University, Abuja (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701136
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16593-16612
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-06
Accepted: 2026-08-11
Published: 2026-08-22
Abstract
This study examines strategies for improving cost performance through effective internal stakeholder management in building construction projects in Nigeria. Despite the critical role of stakeholder management in project success, limited empirical research exists on specific strategies that enhance cost outcomes in the Nigerian construction context. Anchored on stakeholder theory and the resource-based view, this study evaluates stakeholder management strategies across five dimensions: stakeholder identification and analysis, communication and information sharing, trust and expectation management, conflict resolution and collaboration, and continuous improvement and feedback mechanisms. A quantitative survey research design was employed, with data collected from 106 construction professionals in North-Western Nigeria using structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean scores, standard deviations, Relative Importance Index) and multiple regression analysis with comprehensive diagnostic testing. The findings reveal that trust between departments (RII = 0.745), consistency and transparency in decision-making (RII = 0.769), stakeholder participation in decision-making (RII = 0.759), and timely communication of project updates (RII = 0.745) are the most effective strategies for improving cost performance. Regression analysis, validated through multicollinearity diagnostics (VIF < 10) and stepwise regression, identified six significant predictors, with trust between departments (β = 7.852, p = 0.009), consistency in decision-making (β = 4.126, p = 0.025), and timely communication (β = 4.069, p = 0.026) as the strongest positive predictors. The study concludes that structured stakeholder management practices significantly enhance cost performance and recommends the adoption of systematic stakeholder identification tools, transparent communication protocols, collaborative decision-making processes, and continuous feedback mechanisms in Nigerian building construction projects.
Keywords
Stakeholder management strategies, cost performance, internal stakeholders, building construction, Nigeria
Downloads
References
1. Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2015). Stakeholder dynamics during the project front-end: The case of nuclear waste repository projects. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 15-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Afolabi, A., Ojelabi, R., Oyeyipo, O., Tunji-Olayeni, P., & Fagbenle, O. (2022). Influence of stakeholder engagement on project cost performance in the Nigerian construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(5), 1281–1298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-846. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203-221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dainty, A., Moore, D., & Murray, M. (2006). Communication in construction: Theory and practice. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Eriksson, P. E., Larsson, J., & Pesämaa, O. (2020). Managing complex projects in the construction industry: Coordination, communication and trust. Construction Management and Economics, 38(9), 809–825. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Eskerod, P., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2014). Stakeholder management strategies and practices during a project course. Project Management Journal, 45(5), 71-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Karlsen, J. T., Græe, K., & Massaoud, M. J. (2008). Building trust in project-stakeholder relationships. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 7-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Liu, A. M., & Walker, A. (1998). Evaluation of project outcomes. Construction Management & Economics, 16(2), 209-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Liu, J., Jin, X., & Skitmore, M. (2023). Applying the resource-based view in construction project management: A systematic review. International Journal of Project Management, 41(3), 267–282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mendelow, A. L. (1981). Environmental scanning: The impact of the stakeholder concept. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Muinde, J. N., Simon, S. M., & Okaka, J. O. (2025). An evaluation of stakeholder management performance in county government-funded construction projects: A case of Machakos County. East African Journal of Engineering, 8(1), 145–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., Adjei-Kumi, T., & Baiden, B. (2023). Responsibility assignment matrices as a tool for enhancing role clarity in construction projects. Journal of Construction Project Management, 18(4), 256–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Offiong, I. (2025). Procurement planning key to avoiding construction delays and cost overruns in Nigeria. Sustainable Construction Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Ogunlana, S. O., & Sooksuk, R. (2016). Cost performance in construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 521-535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Oke, A. E., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Akinradewo, O. (2023). Communication management as a driver for improved project delivery in the Nigerian construction industry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Okeagu, C. E., Akabogu, L. E., & Ugwu, O. O. (2022). Impact of stakeholders on the success of project cost management in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(12), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ola-awo, A. W., Idoro, G. I., & Oke, A. E. (2022). Critical success factors for stakeholder management in Nigerian construction projects. Acta Structilia, 29(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Olasunkanmi, F. O., Femi-Favour, A. A., & Okon, U. J. (2024). Team commitment and performance of construction projects in the Nigerian construction industry. Human Resources Management and Services, 6(2), 3402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pinto, J. K., Slevin, D. P., & English, B. (2009). Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 638-648. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co‐creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Project Management Institute. (2018). Pulse of the profession 2018: Success in disruptive times. Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Rajablu, M., Marthandan, G., & Yusoff, W. F. W. (2015). Managing for stakeholders: The role of stakeholder-based management in project success. Asian Social Science, 11(3), 111-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Thamhain, H. (2013). Managing risks in complex projects. Project Management Journal, 44(2), 20-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Xue, X. (2011). Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 900-910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria