Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Chid and Addolescent Assessment: A Critical Review of Psychometric Evidence, Cross Cultural Applicability, and Implications for Kenya

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used behavioral screening instrument for assessing emotional and behavioral difficulties among children and adolescents. This is due to its accessibility, brevity and applicability across educational, clinical and research settings. Developed by Goodman in 1997, the SDQ is a 25-item questionnaire comprising five domains: Emotional symptoms, Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer Problems and Pro-Social Behavior. The analytical narrative review critically examines the historical development theoretical foundations, psychometric properties, cultural adaptation, clinical utility, and evidence regarding SDQ across global, African and Kenyan contexts. Relevant literature published from 2022 onwards was reviewed, and only seminal studies retained where necessary to provide theoretical and historical context. Literature addressing SDQ reliability, validity, factor structure, measurement invariance, standardization, cultural adaptation and clinical utility was synthesized, with particular attention to evidence from Kenya and other African settings. Overall, the evidence supports the usefulness of the SDQ as a screening instrument although psychometric performance varies across subscales, populations, informants and cultural contexts. Evidence from African settings indicate variability in cultural measurement, performance and factor structure highlighting the importance of context specific validation. In Kenya SDQ has been used increasingly in child and adolescent research, but evidence remains limited particularly regarding measurement invariance, comprehensive validation and locally driven norms. The review supports continued use of SDQ as a screening measure with cautious context sensitive interpretation while emphasizing need for comprehensive Kenyan psychometric validation, cultural adaptation and development of locally appropriate normative data are thus recommended to strengthen validity, applicability and reliability.

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, SDQ, Psychometric properties, behavioral assessment, Children, Adolescents, Cultural adaptation

1. Aadland, K. N., Lervag, A., Ommundse, Y., & Aadland, E. (2022). Structural Validity of the Nowegian Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Children Aged 3-6 Years. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1024918. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aarø, L. E., Davids, E. L., Mathews, C. Wubs, A. G., Smith, O. R. F., & de Vries P. J. (2022). Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, and Prosocail Behaviour- Three Dimensions of the Strenghts and Diffiulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Study Among South African Adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 415-425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council of Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing . American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baseke, R., Kilonzo, R., Ngesa, M., Mwende, P., & Osborn, T. (2026). A Dataset on Adolescent Mental Helath in Kenya. Data Briefs, 65, 112513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Basheer, S., Tan, S. F., David, R., Majumder, P., & Sayal, K. (2025). The Acceptibility and Effectiveness of Standardized Diagnostic Assessment Approaches in Children and Young People's Mental Health Services: An Updated Systematic Review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 30(4), 364-374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bergstrom, M., & Baviskar, S. (2020). A Systematic Review os Some Reliability and Validity Issues Regarding the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 17(6), 1-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carneiro, F. A., Costa, P. A., & Leal, I. (2023). Construct-realted Valididty of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with Three Dimensions: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. Journal of Helth Psychology, 28(4), 412-425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, J. R., & Choi, J. W. (2022). Is ACEs Screening for Adolescent Mental Health Accurate and Fair? Prevention Science, 23(7), 1216-1229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. de Ayala, R. J. (2022). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De Los Reyes, A., Wnag, M., Lerner, M. D., Makol, B. A., Fitzpatrick, O. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2023). The Operations Triad Model of Youth Mental Health Assessments: Catalyzing a Paradigm Shift in Measurement Validation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent , 52(1), 19-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. de Vries, P. J., Davids, E. L., Mathews C., Aaro. L. E., Wubs, A. G., & Smith, O. R. F. (2018). Measuring Adolescent Mental Health Around the Globe: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in South Africa, and Comparison with UK, Austarlian and Chunese data. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 27(4), 369-380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Flake, J, K., Davidson, I. J., Wong O., & Pek, J. (2022). Construct Validity and the Validity of Replication Studies: A Systematic Review. American Psychologist, 77(4), 576-588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goodman, R. (1997). The Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581-586. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Goodman, R. (1999). The Extended Version of the Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Guide to Child Psychiatric Caseness and Consequent Burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(5), 791-799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric Properties of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337-1345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Goodman, R., Ford, T., & Meltzer, H. (2002). Mental Health Problems of Children in the Community: 18 Month Follow Up. BMJ, 324(7352), 1496-1497. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Goodman, R., Simmons H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to Screen for Child Psychiatric Disorders in a Community Sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 534-539. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Groth-Marnat, G & Wright, A. J. (2024). Handbook of Psychological Asessment. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hoosen, N., Davids, E. L., de Vries, P. J., & Shung-King, M. (2018). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Africa: A Scooping Review of its Application and Validation. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence Based Assessment . Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Internation Testing Commission. (2023). ITC Guidelines for Trnslating and Adapting Tests. International Journal of Testing, 23(2), 89-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jay, M. A., Sanders-Ellis, D/. Blackburn, R., Deighton, J., & Gilbert, R. (2023). Umbrella Systematic Reviews Finds Limiting Evidence that School Absence Explains the Association between Chronic Health Conditions and Lower Academic Attainment. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. 1122769. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kankaanpaa R., Totto, P., Punamaki, R.-L., & Peltonen, K. (2023). Is it Time to Revise the SDQ? The Psychometric Evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 35(12), 1069-1084. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kankaanpää, R., Töttö, P., Punamäki, r.-L., & Peltonen, K. (2023). Is it Time to Revise the SDQ? The Psychometric Evaluation of The Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 35(12), 1069-1084. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Karlsson, P., Larm, P., Svensson, J., & Raninen, J. (2022). The Factor Structure of the Strength and Difficuties Questionnaire in a National Sample of Swedish Adolescents: Comparing 3 and 5 factor models. PLOS ONE, 17 (3), E0265481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kashala, E., Elgen, I., Sommerfel, K., & Tylleskar, T. (2005). Teacher Reports of Behavioural and Emotional Problems among Schoolchildren in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. European Child and Adolescent and Adolescent pychiatry , 14, 381-387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Khawaja N. G., & Dhushyanthakumar. (2020). Strenghts and Difficulties questinnaire-Teaacher Ivestigating Factor Structure and Utility rwith Culturally and Linguistically DIverse Students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 30(2), 199-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Liegmann, K., Fischer, L., Dadaczynski, K., Hanewinkel, R., & Morgenstren, M. (2025). Reliability and Validity of the Self Report Version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Primary School Children. International Journal of Behviural Development, 49(4), 406-414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lord, F. M., Norvick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Margaretha, M., Azzopardi, P. S., Fisher, J., & Sawyer, S. M. (2023). School Based Mental Health Promotion: A Global Policy Review. Child and Adolescent , 14, 1126767. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mbithi, G., Mabrouk, A., Sarki, A., Odhiambo, R., Namuguzi, M., Dzombo, J. T., Atukwatse, J., Kabue, M., Mwangi, P., & Abubakar, A. (2023). Mental Health and Psychological Well-being of Kenyan Adolescents from Nairobi and the Coast Regions in the Context of COVID-19. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 17, 63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mokkink, L. B., Elsman, E. B., Terwee, C. B. (2024). COSMIN Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Version 2.0. Quality of Life, 33(11) 2929-2939. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ortuno-Sierra, J., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Paini, M., Sastre i Riba, S., & Muniz, J. (2015). Screening Mental Health Problems During Adolescence: Psychometric Properites of the Spanish Version of the Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 38, 49-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ortuno-Sierra, J., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Paino, M., & Sastre i Riba, S. (2022). Cross-Cultural Validation and Measurement Invariance of Strengths and Difficulites Questionnaire: A Systematic Review. Current Psychology, 41, 6154-6170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sawyer, M. G., et al. (2024). Validity of Strengths and Difficulty Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents. Diagnostics, 14(21), 2433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sheel, H., Suarez, L., & Marsh, N. V. (2025). The Factor Structure of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Indian. Assessment, 43(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Siva, T. B. F., Osorio, F. L., & Loureiro. (2024). Discriminative Validity abd Diagnostic Potential . Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 811. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. F., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: A REview of the Literature . Clinical and Family Psychology Review, 18(3), 254-274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Chiarotto A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., de Vat, H. C., Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN Methodology for Evaluating the Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Delphi Study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159-1170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Theunissen, M. H. C., de Wolff, M. S., Eekhout, I., Mieloo, C. L., Stone, L. L., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2022). The strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent: Dutch Norms and Validity. BMC Paediatrics, 22 Article 202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2023). Cross Cultural Assessment- Principles and Applications. In D. H. Saklofske, V. L. Schwean, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Psychological Assessment. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vugteveen, J., De Bildt, A., Timmerman, M. E. (2022). Normative Data for the Self Reported and Parent-Reported Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for ages 12-17. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 16, Article 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wilcox, G., Schroeder, M., & Drefs, M. A. (2023). Clinical Reasonong: A Missing Piece for Improving Evidence Based Assessment in Psychology. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. World Health Organization. (2024). Adolescent Mental Health. WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wright, A. J., Pade, H., Gottfried, E. D., Arbisis, P. A., McCord, D. M., & Wygant, D. B. (2022). Evidence Bases Clinical Psychological Assessment (EBPA): Review of Current State of Literature and Best Practices. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 53(4), 372-386. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Youngstrom, E. A., Choukas-Bradely, S., Calhoun, C. D., & Jensen-Doss, A. (2023). Evidence-Based Assessment in Child and Adolescent Mental Health: Recent Advances and Future Directions. Journal of Clinical and Child Adolescent Psychology, 52(5), 689-704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhong, C., Huang, J., Luo, Z., Lian, C., Zhou, M., & Kuang, L. (2022). Development and Validation of Rapid Assessment Survey of Primary Care in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 852730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being