Structural Impact of Lean Manufacturing Practice Bundles on Corporate Sustainability in Malaysia
Authors
Department of Management and Technology, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Management and Technology, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Management and Technology, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)
Department of Management and Technology, Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Digital Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani (Malaysia)
School of Technology Management and Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010, Kedah (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600546
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 7839-7860
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-06-29
Abstract
In Malaysia, as organisations in the public and private sectors intensify their efforts to extend their goals related to sustainability, the issue has turned into a strategic one. Sustainability data, particularly ESG data, has the potential to significantly enhance Malaysia's sustainability environment. Nevertheless, such data remains difficult to access, particularly for the manufacturing sector in Malaysia. Hence, this study investigates the influence of lean practices on the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) reporting in Malaysian manufacturing organisations, given the critical role that private sector participation plays in enabling the accomplishment of Malaysian sustainability. The purpose of this research is to better understand how stakeholders monitor and manage sustainability, as well as the potential influence of lean practices on sustainability in the private sector, particularly in Malaysian manufacturing. This research adopts a quantitative research design, data was collected from 115 manufacturing firms through structured survey distributed to middle and upper management. The structural model analysis reveals that lean manufacturing practices, when implemented as an integrated bundle, explain a substantial percentage of the variance across all three sustainability pillars: 63.7% for Economic, 62.2% for Environmental, and 58.7% for Social sustainability. At a granular level, the findings uncover the absolute path dominance of Gemba Walks (Floor Leadership Engagement) as the most robust and statistically significant driver of sustainability performance across the TBL. Conversely, traditional structural tools such as 5S, TPM, and Kaizen demonstrated weak and non-significant direct path relationships in this specific sample, suggesting they function as secondary stabilizing platforms rather than immediate performance drivers. This research provides empirical validation emphasizing that Malaysian manufacturers should adopt lean practices as a holistic, unified system driven by active leadership on the shop floor to effectively meet reporting demands and enhance corporate responsibility.
Keywords
Lean Manufacturing Practices, Sustainability Performance, Triple Bottom Line (TBL), Malaysian Manufacturing
Downloads
References
1. Abdul Razak, L., Ibrahim, M. H., & Ng, A. (2023). Environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and CDS spreads: the role of country sustainability. Journal of Risk Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-10-2022-0278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abidin, M. H. Z., Leman, Z., Abidin, Z., Yusof, M., & Ismail, M. Y. (2022). Scrutinizing The Impact of Essential Lean Methods on Sustainable Performance In Malaysian Manufacturing Firms. Jurnal Teknologi, 84(5), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v84.18413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aikens, C. H. (2011). Quality inspired management: The key to sustainability. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2010.11917820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Alguirat, I., Lehyani, F., & Zouari, A. (2024). Impact of lean management on work safety and operational excellence within Tunisian companies. International journal of lean six sigma, 15(3), 588-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-02-2023-0032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ammon, T., Bonertz, T., & Zollondz, H. D. (2013). Grundlagen Lean Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Andras, I., Nan, M. S., Kovacs, I., Cristea, D., & Tomescu, L. C. (2006). Research regarding the OEE (overall equipment effectiveness) assessment of the coal open pit mines production system. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Mechanical Engineering, 8, 139-146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Atkinson, P. E. (2013). Implementation of lean culture change and continuous improvement. Operations Management, 39(3), 16-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Baah, C., Acquah, I. S. K., & Ofori, D. (2022). Exploring the influence of supply chain collaboration on supply chain visibility, stakeholder trust, environmental and financial performances: a partial least square approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(1), 172-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Berhe, H. H. (2022). Application of Kaizen philosophy for enhancing manufacturing industries’ performance: exploratory study of Ethiopian chemical industries. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(1), 204-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2020-0328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bertolini, M., Braglia, M., Marrazzini, L., & Neroni, M. (2022). Project Time Deployment: A new lean tool for losses analysis in Engineer-to-Order production environments. International Journal of Production Research, 60(10), 3129-3146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1912428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bortolotti, T., Danese, P., Flynn, B. B., & Romano, P. (2015). Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 227-241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Bortolotti, T., Danese, P., & Romano, P. (2013). Assessing the impact of just-in-time on operational performance at varying degrees of repetitiveness. International Journal of production research, 51(4), 1117-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.678403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Cercós, M. P., Calvo, L. M., & Domingo, R. (2019). An exploratory study on the relationship of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) variables and CO2 emissions. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.07.050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Hurley, B., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Anosike, A., & Batista, L. (2019). Green and lean: A Gemba-Kaizen model for sustainability enhancement. Production Planning and Control, 30(5–6), 385–399. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1501808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Cheung, G. W. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity in structural equation modelling. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 35–55. doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09871-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Cil, I., & Turkan, Y. S. (2013). An ANP-based assessment model for lean enterprise transformation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64(5), 1113-1130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Costa, R., & Lopes, I. (2021, August). Productivity improvement in manufacturing systems through TPM, OEE and collaboration between maintenance and production: a case study. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 261-268). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Díaz-Reza, J. R., García-Alcaraz, J. L., Gil-López, A. J., & Realyvasquez-Vargas, A. (2024). Lean manufacturing tools as drivers of social sustainability in the Mexican maquiladora industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 196, 110516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Díaz-Reza, J. R., Mousavi, S. H., Sánchez-Ramírez, C., & García-Alcaraz, J. L. (2024). Achieving social sustainability through lean manufacturing practices: Insights from structural equation model and system dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448(October 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Anosike, A. (2019). The relationship between lean and environmental performance: Practices and measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 120-131. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Durojaye Moshood, T., Nawanir, G., Teong Lim, K., Loon Lee, K., & Nur Aizat Ahmad, A. (2020). Less for More: The Structural Effects of Lean Manufacturing Practices on Sustainability of Manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. In Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt (Vol. 9, Issue 2). http://excelingtech.co.uk/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Elemure, I., Dhakal, H. N., Leseure, M. and Radulovic, J. (2023) ‘Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Eranga, W. A., & Wijesinghe, M. R. P. (2021). Sustainability Reporting and Company Financial Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Market. International Journal of Accountancy, 1(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.4038/ija.v1i1.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ferdows, K., & De Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. Journal of Operations management, 9(2), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243781018001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet research, 29(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. García-Alcaraz, J. L., Díaz Reza, J. R., Sánchez Ramírez, C., Limón Romero, J., Jiménez Macías,E., Lardies, C. J., & Rodríguez Medina, M. A. (2021). Lean manufacturing tools applied to material flow and their impact on economic sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. García-Alcaraz, J. L., Morales García, A. S., Díaz-Reza, J. R., Jiménez Macías, E., Javierre Lardies, C., & Blanco Fernández, J. (2022). Effect of lean manufacturing tools on sustainability: the case of Mexican maquiladoras. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39622–39637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18978-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hallgren, M., & Olhager, J. (2009). Lean and agile manufacturing : external and internal drivers and performance outcomes. Internatioal Journal of Operation & Production Management, 29(10), 976–999. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910993456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Hon, K. K. B. (2005). Performance and Evaluation of Manufacturing Systems. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 54(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60023-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Imran, M., Dai, H. L., Zaidi, F. S., Tran, K. P., Abbas, Z., & Nazir, H. Z. (2023). Incorporating principal component analysis into Hotelling T2 control chart for compositional data monitoring. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 186, 109755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Kilic, R., & Erkayman, B. (2021). A simulation approach for transition to jit production system. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 20(3), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM20-3-566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Klein, L. L., De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Dorion, E. C. H., & Schirmer Feltrin, T. (2023). Lean practices toward a balanced sustainability in higher education institutions: a Brazilian experience. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Kumar, K. S., Akila, K., Arun, K. K., Prabhu, S., & Selvakumar, C. (2022). Implementation of 5S practices in a small scale manufacturing industries. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62,1913-1916. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Leksic, I., Stefanic, N. and Veza, I. (2020) ‘The impact of using different lean manufacturing tools on waste reduction’, Advances in Production Engineering And Management, 15(1), pp. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to total productive maintenance (TPM)(productivity press). http://www.plant-maintenance.com/articles/tpm_intro.shtml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Nawanir, G., Lim, K. T., Othman, S. N., & Adeleke, A. Q. (2018). Developing and validating lean manufacturing constructs: an SEM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5), 1382-1405. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Ng, K. C., Goh, G. G. G., & Eze, U. C. (2012, December). Barriers in total productive maintenance implementation in a semiconductor manufacturing firm: A case study. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 377-381). IEEE. 10.1109/IEEM.2012.6837765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System. Productivity Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Okoro, G. O. (2024). The role of Kaizen approach on quality improvement of oil and gas industry in Nigeria. BW Academic Journal, 17-17. https://bwjournal.org/index.php/bsjournal/article/view/1860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Palange, A., & Dhatrak, P. (2021). Lean manufacturing a vital tool to enhance productivity in manufacturing. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 729-736. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Purwanto, C., & Jaqin, C. (2021). Improving curing process productivity in the tire industry using OEE, TPM and FMEA methods. In 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management at Singapore, March (pp. 7-11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Queiroz, G. A., Alves Junior, P. N., & Costa Melo, I. (2022). Digitalization as an enabler to SMEs implementing lean-green? A systematic review through the topic modelling approach. Sustainability 14 (21), 14089 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Romero, D., Gaiardelli, P., Wuest, T., Powell, D., & Thürer, M. (2020, August). New forms of Gemba walks and their digital tools in the digital lean manufacturing world. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, 432-440. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Sahoo, S., & Yadav, S. (2018). Lean production practices and bundles: a comparative analysis. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(3), 374-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-01-2017-0002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Samadhiya, A., Agrawal, R., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Investigating the influence of total productive maintenance key success factors on the social sustainability dimension of manufacturing SMEs. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2022-0287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Schonberger, R. J. (2007). Japanese production management: An evolution-With mixed success. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Schultz, A. L., & Klungseth, N. J. (2022, November). Lean and visual managements contribution to sustainable facilities management. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1101, No. 6, p. 062011). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/6/062011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Shahriar, M. M., Parvez, M. S., Islam, M. A., & Talapatra, S. (2022). Implementation of 5S in a plastic bag manufacturing industry: A case study. Cleaner Engineering and Technology,8, 100488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of operations management, 21(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2020). Application of lean manufacturing in automotive manufacturing unit. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 171–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2018-0060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Slavina, T. and Štefanić, N. (2024) ‘Facing Challenges of Implementing Total Productive Management and Lean Tools in Manufacturing Enterprises’, Systems, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Suryaprakash, M., Prabha, M. G., Yuvaraja, M., & Revanth, R. R. (2021). Improvement of overall equipment effectiveness of machining centre using tpm. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 9348-9353. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Taj, S., & Morosan, C. (2011). The Impact of Lean Operations on the Chinese Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111102234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Tan, L. P., & Wong, K. Y. (2015). Linkage between knowledge management and manufacturing performance : a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4), 814–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2014-0487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Veres, C., Marian, L., Moica, S., & Al-Akel, K. (2018). Case study concerning 5S method impact in an automotive company. Procedia manufacturing, 22, 900-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Virk, S. I., Khan, M. A., Lakho, T. H., & Indher, A. A. (2020). Review of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) & Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Practices in Manufacturing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Wijesinghe, M. R. P., Kasthuriarachchi, L. M., & Bandara, R. M. S. (2023). Sustainability Reporting and Ownership Concentration Towards Company Performance: An Analysis of Sri Lankan Listed Companies. Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ -2023)At: Gold Coast - Australia, 1–23. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Beyond Toyota: How to root out waste and pursue perfection. In Harvard Business Review1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Yousefloo, A., Babazadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., Pirayesh, A., & Dolgui, A. (2023). Design of a robust waste recycling network integrating social and environmental pillars of sustainability. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 176, 108970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108970 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Ziaja, S., & Piętka, K. (2025). OEE Monitoring System for Production Processes Based on Integration of IoT Sensor Data. Inżynieria Mineralna, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Zvidzayi, J. (2021). Analysis of critical success factors of Gemba kaizen in lean manufacturing within SA industries. In Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management (pp. 2250-2259). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria