Student Satisfaction in Online Learning: The Modulating Role of Academic Programs and Demographic Profiles

Authors

Ma Erenita V. Bahian

Western Leyte College (Philippines)

Charlene C. Pita

Eastern Visayas State University, Ormoc Campus (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700047

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 626-635

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-06

Accepted: 2026-07-11

Published: 2026-07-23

Abstract

This study examined the satisfaction levels of undergraduate students with online learning across five specific areas: instructor, technology, course setup, interaction, outcomes, and overall satisfaction, as well as the factors that affect them. The participants in the study included 1344 students who attended Eastern Visayas State University which were sampled using a stratified random sampling technique. A 24-item questionnaire was used to gather information on participants' demographics and satisfaction with online learning. Frequency counts, percentages, means, and standard deviations were used in descriptive statistics, while inferential tests used t-tests and ANOVA. The results showed that although students were satisfied with their instructors (M = 3.63) and the technology provided (M = 3.56), they rated interaction the lowest (M = 3.39). This lack of association was accompanied by a decline in overall satisfaction (M = 3.22), although some students reported being quite satisfied with their experience. Also, the students' major was the greatest predictor of their satisfaction level. Hands-on programs like Engineering and Education struggled significantly more online compared to computer-based majors like Business and Industrial Technology. The data also showed that older students were more satisfied overall, likely due to better time-management habits, whereas prior online class experience did not have a statistically significant effect. The study concludes that the presence of functioning technologies and quality teachers alone cannot ensure success in online education. To be successful in the long run, institutions of higher learning should go beyond mere content uploads and focus on developing interactive, field-oriented hybrid courses.

Keywords

online learning, student satisfaction, instructor support, technology integration, social interaction

Downloads

References

1. Al-Busadi, M., Al-Kharusi, H., & Al-Harthy, I. (2022). Age-related differences in self-regulated learning and academic satisfaction in online university courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00342-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Khatib, M. (2024). Beyond the screen: Modeling the impact of instructor immediacy and responsiveness on student e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 210, Article 104952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alasagheirin, M., Olsen, J. M., Mota, D., Lagunas, M., & Bogle, B. D. (2023). Examining students’ online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 to inform post-pandemic program planning. Nursing Reports, 13(1), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13010031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alshathry, S., & Alojail, M. (2024). The psychological toll of transactional distance: Investigating the link between online interaction deficits and holistic course satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4821–4843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12111-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2022). An investigation of relations between student satisfaction and persistent intentions in online courses. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1823861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), Article 1920090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Faize, F. A., & Nawaz, M. (2023). Evaluating institutional technical readiness and faculty pedagogical skills as predictors of university student e-learning acceptance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Innab, A., Albloushi, M., Alruwaili, M., Alqahtani, N., Alenazi, L., & Alkathiri, A. (2022). The influence of sense of community and satisfaction with e-learning and their impact on nursing students’ academic achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(4), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i4.6436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Najjar, R. A., Al-Amir, S., & Khoury, M. (2025). Curricular mismatch in virtual spaces: Assessing pedagogical friction in tactile and field-dependent academic programs. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(3), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. PLOS One Research Cohort. (2023). Transactional distance and cognitive load: A multi-country evaluation of social isolation in virtual classrooms. PLOS One, 18(11), Article e0293411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Prakasha, G. S., Hemalatha, K., & Shepherd, R. (2023). The socialization deficit: Exploring university students’ isolation and community barriers in asynchronous formats. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(5), 1192–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2141523 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sabah, N. M. (2022). Exploring the drivers of students' continued usage intention and satisfaction with online learning platforms. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), Article 100643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Scholaro Research Network. (2026). Global e-learning satisfaction benchmarks: Tracking technical infrastructure vs. pedagogical quality in higher education (Scholaro Academic Reports). Scholaro Research Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharif Nia, H., Marôco, J., She, L., Khoshnavay Fomani, F., Rahmatpour, P., Stepanovic Ilic, I., Mohammad Ibrahim, M., Muhammad Ibrahim, F., Narula, S., Esposito, G., Gorgulu, O., Naghavi, N., Pahlevan Sharif, S., Allen, K., Kaveh, O., & Reardon, J. (2023). Student satisfaction and academic efficacy during online learning with the mediating effect of student engagement: A multi-country study. PLOS One, 18(10), Article e0285315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. St. Dominic College of Asia Research Board. (2025). The democratization of digital access: Evaluating the neutralization of prior online experience among contemporary Filipino undergraduates. SDCA Institutional Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Statista. (2025). Higher education technology market size, share, and global online learning enrollment trends. Statista Research & Analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, X. R., & Qu, H. (2021). Gender-skewed perceptions of remote instructional support: An analysis of student compliance with explicit assessment rubrics. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2020.1791131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yang, X., & Lou, Y. (2024). Facilitating baseline system acceptance: The role of course set-up clarity and faculty instructional agility in digital classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2078410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles