Student Teachers as Game Designers: Applying Design Thinking in Educational Tabletop Games Development

Educational tabletop games offer significant pedagogical advantages due to their tangible, collaborative nature and minimal technological requirements, positioning them as valuable tools for diverse educational settings. While Design Thinking, a systematic framework encompassing empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing, is recognized for fostering 21st-century competencies and empowering educators, its application to non-digital tabletop game design remains underexplored. This study investigated how student teachers applied the five phases of Design Thinking in developing tabletop games for instructional use. Employing an exploratory qualitative case study, the research discovered six groups of student teachers from a Malaysian public university, gathering data through participant observations, focus group discussions, cultural probes via weekly e-portfolios and document analysis. Findings revealed a systematic and effective adoption across all Design Thinking phases: participants adeptly used Empathize to identify authentic learning challenges, synthesized findings into actionable problem statements during Define, blended pedagogical knowledge with creative game design in Ideate, facilitated rapid iteration in Prototyping, and recursively refined their games through Testing, significantly enhancing both educational effectiveness and playability. This research highlights Design Thinking's flexibility in non-digital educational contexts, offering practical insights for developing game design competencies in future educators and enhancing teacher development programs.

Keywords

Design Thinking, Educational Tabletop Games, Student Teachers

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Agbo, F. J., Olaleye, S. A., Bower, M., & Oyelere, S. S. (2023). Examining the relationships between students’ perceptions of technology, pedagogy, and cognition: The case of immersive virtual reality mini games to foster computational thinking in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00233-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boller, S., & Kapp, K. (2017). Play to learn: Everything you need to know about designing effective learning games. ATD Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bressler, D. M., & Annetta, L. A. (2022). Using game design to increase teachers' familiarity with design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(2), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09628-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, T. (2019). Change by design, revised and updated: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bulut, D., Samur, Y., & Cömert, Z. (2022). The effect of educational game design process on students' creativity. Smart Learning Environments, 9, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00188-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., Casas, R., & Dieste, B. (2023). Making design thinking for education sustainable: Training preservice teachers to address practice challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Durga, A. K. (2022). Tools for design thinking. In K. Kumar & M. Kurni (Eds.), Design thinking: A forefront insight (pp. 1–11). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003189923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Engelstein, G., & Shalev, I. (2022). Building blocks of tabletop game design: An encyclopedia of mechanisms (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003179184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Epstein, D. S., Zemski, A., Enticott, J., & Barton, C. (2021). Tabletop board game elements and gamification interventions for health behavior change: Realist review and proposal of a game design framework. JMIR Serious Games, 9(1), e23302. https://doi.org/10.2196/23302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gwangwava, N. (2021). Learning design thinking through a hands-on learning model. International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hsieh, H. W., Wu, C. S., Tsai, C. C., Liao, Y. C., Chen, P. Y., Tseng, H. L., Huang, M. Z., & Chen, M. F. (2023). Comparing the effectiveness of board game-based and drill-based education programs in improving Taiwanese nurses’ fire safety knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 129, Article 105919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hua, W., Eng, L., Wu, T., & Yu, B. (2023). Developing a graphic design thinking model to enhance creative thinking. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. IDEO U. (2023). Design thinking. https://www.ideou.com/pages/design-thinking [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using design thinking to cultivate the next generation of female STEAM thinkers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kim, H., Yi, P., & Ko, B. (2022). Deepening students' experiences with problem identification and definition in an empathetic approach: Lessons from a university design-thinking program. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2022-0083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Luthfi, M. I., & Wardani, R. (2019). Application of design thinking in designing history instructional media for high school students. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(16), 698–710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Martin, S. M., Casey, J. R., & Kane, S. (2021). Serious games in personalized learning: New models for design and performance. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Matsui, H. (2023). Utilizing design thinking as a compass to develop a personalized flipped learning curriculum. In Design thinking and innovation in education. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Moffett, J., & Cassidy, D. (2023). Building a digital educational escape room using an online design-thinking process. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ní Shé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., & Costello, E. (2021). Integrating design thinking into instructional design: The #OpenTeach case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Noh, S. C., & Karim, A. M. A. (2021). Design thinking mindset to enhance Education 4.0 competitiveness in Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Panke, S. (2020). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rösch, N., Tiberius, V., & Kraus, S. (2023). Design thinking for innovation: Context factors, process, and outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Stanford d.school. (2018). Design thinking bootleg. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Storm, J., & Smith, A. (2023). Empathize with whom? Adopting a design thinking mind-set to stimulate sustainability initiatives in Chinese SMEs. Sustainability, 15(1), Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Videnovik, M., Vold, T., Dimova, G., Kiønig, L., & Trajkovik, V. (2022). Migration of an escape room–style educational game to an online environment: Design thinking methodology. JMIR Serious Games, 10(3), e32095. https://doi.org/10.2196/32095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wasyluk, P., & Kucner, A. (2021). Customer-centricity in designing: Application of design thinking methodology in creating educational solutions at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. European Research Studies Journal, 24(S3), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2021). Using design thinking in educational game design: A case study of pre-service teacher experience. In R. Li et al. (Eds.), Blended learning: Re-thinking and re-defining the learning process (pp. 243–254). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80504-3_21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Student Teachers as Game Designers: Applying Design Thinking in Educational Tabletop Games Development

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles