Students’ Digital Trajectories in Improving Communicative Competence through Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: A Meta-Synthesis

Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) has emerged as a transformative pathway in developing learners’ communicative competence, particularly in digitally-mediated learning environments. This meta-synthesis explores students’ digital learning trajectories by integrating evidence from thirteen peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025. Anchored on sociocultural and interactionist perspectives, the review examines how mobile applications such as Duolingo, HelloTalk, WhatsApp, WeChat, Busuu, and custom MALL platforms shape linguistic, pragmatic, intercultural, and strategic competence. Findings reveal three overarching themes: (1) Digital Interaction as Communicative Accelerator, showing that authentic, real-time exchanges through chat, voice, and video tools enhance fluency, lexical richness, and pragmatic appropriateness; (2) Mobile-Mediated Feedback as Adaptive Scaffolding, where multimodal feedback (text, emojis, audio corrections) supports self-monitoring and reduces language anxiety; and (3) Learner Agency and Mobility, demonstrating that flexible, on-the-go learning promotes autonomy and sustained engagement across varied sociolinguistic contexts. Across studies, MALL is shown to strengthen intercultural competence by enabling cross-cultural interactions and to improve pragmatic awareness through exposure to authentic discourse patterns. However, challenges remain, including digital distractions, uneven access, and the need for teacher guidance in curating meaningful mobile tasks. Overall, this meta-synthesis concludes that students’ digital trajectories within MALL environments significantly contribute to communicative competence, provided that mobile tools are pedagogically aligned and used within socially interactive learning ecosystems.

Mobile-Assisted Language Learning, Communicative Competence, Digital Trajectories

1. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alamer, A., & Lee, J. (2021). Language learning motivation and MALL engagement: A self-determination perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(9), 1357–1383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1609059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albelbisi, N. A., & Yusop, F. D. (2021). Factors influencing learners’ self-regulated learning skills in a massive open online course (MOOC) environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alturkistani, A., Majeed, A., & Car, J. (2021). MOOCs and online learning during COVID-19: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 11(7), e046616. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bárcena, E., Read, T., & Martín-Monje, E. (2020). Enhancing oral interaction skills in LMOOCs through synchronous virtual classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 125–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.10125/44714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bárcena, E., & Martín-Monje, E. (2021). Language MOOCs: An overview and research agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1872468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burston, J. (2020). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 32(3), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834402000002X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence, revisited. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cabauatan, R. J., & Tibudan, C. B. (2020). TESDA online program in the Philippines: A response to the call for flexible learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 98–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3826212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Castañeda, D., & Cho, M. (2023). Mobile messaging for pragmatic competence. Language Learning & [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Technology, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.10125/73412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chen, X., & Zhang, W. (2025). Developing intercultural competence through HelloTalk. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2024.1899012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Commission on Higher Education. (2020). Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning (CHED Memorandum Order No. 4, s. 2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dizon, G. (2020). Duolingo and oral proficiency development. CALICO Journal, 37(2), 136–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.40217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Emerging technologies, looking back and moving ahead. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 1–7. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73466 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Emerging technologies: MALL and autonomy. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.10125/73419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hew, K. F., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). Understanding student engagement in large-scale open online courses: A review of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 30, 100337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hoi, V. N., & Mu, G. M. (2021). Exploring the acceptance of mobile language learning by learners in Vietnam. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hsu, L. (2023). Investigating students’ acceptance of LMOOCs in higher education. Computer Assisted [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1976210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Isla-Montes, J.-L., Berns, A., Palomo-Duarte, M., & Dodero, J.-M. (2022). Redesigning a foreign language learning task using mobile devices. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5686. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jeong, K.-O. (2022). Facilitating sustainable self-directed learning experience with MALL. Sustainability, 14(5), 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Jonassen, D. H. (2020). Revisiting constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09722-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Joksimović, S., et al. (2020). Engagement in MOOCs: A large-scale study. Computers & Education, 146, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? Opportunities and challenges for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for successful online courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Gönülal, T. (2023). Comparing Duolingo and Babbel. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2215294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2020). MOOCs completion rates. Education Sciences, 10(4), 112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Integrative model of behavior prediction for mobile language learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Li, G., & Chen, H. (2021). Peer feedback in MOOCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lin, C.-H., Yu, S., & Wang, H. (2020). Examining MALL for communicative competence growth. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202010_23(4).0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2024). Voice messaging for anxiety reduction. System, 122, 102981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.102981 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lu, X., & Li, G. (2022). Integrating MOOCs into communication courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1729208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Mahdi, H. (2021). Effectiveness of mobile-based tasks. ReCALL, 33(2), 152–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Manalo, M. A., & Enriquez, M. E. (2022). MOOCs in Philippine higher education. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6567891 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Menezes, A., & Cardoso, W. (2022). Pronunciation development via mobile speech recognition. Language Learning & Technology, 26(3), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.10125/73621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Meyer, J. G., et al. (2023). ChatGPT and large language models in academia. BioData Mining, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Moher, D., et al. (2015). PRISMA statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Page, M. J., et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in online learning during COVID-19. Sustainability, 12(20), 9192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12209192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of research with human subjects. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32039-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Richards, J. C. (2021). Communicative Language Teaching today. RELC Journal, 52(3), 383–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211022565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Rovira-Collado, J., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., & Mateo-Guillén, C. (2023). An L-MOOC to improve communicative competence. Education Sciences, 13(7), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Siemens, G. (2020). Connectivism: Updated insights. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 17(3), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Sokolova, N., & Mamedov, A. (2023). Language MOOCs for communication skills enhancement. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.16347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Soyoof, A., & Reynolds, B. (2023). Mobile social networking apps and intercultural communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(5–6), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1934048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Stockwell, G. (2021). Learner agency in mobile contexts. System, 99, 102521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Stoughton, A. M., & Kang, O. (2024). Mobile-assisted pronunciation: A systematic review. Languages, 9(7), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Sudina, E., & Plonsky, L. (2024). Duolingo as a learning environment. Journal of Second Language Studies, 7(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00021.plo [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Sun, Y. (2020). Video-based MOOCs and listening comprehension. ReCALL, 32(3), 354–372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. https://sdgs.un.org/goals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Upshaw, J. D., Stevens, C. E., Ganis, G., & Zabelina, D. L. (2022). The hidden cost of smartphone notifications. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0277220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: Smartphone presence reduces cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Yang, P., & Yang, Z. (2025). Pragmatic development through HelloTalk. Journal of Pragmatics, 224, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.105612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Yu, M. (2024). Foreign language anxiety in digital learning environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1373290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2020). Understanding student motivation in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 145, 103725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Zou, D., & Thomas, N. (2022). Technology-enhanced language learning and anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar