Students’ Learning Styles and General Mathematics Achievement: Basis for the Development of Strategic Intervention Material

Authors

Melgene V. De la Cruz

Batangas State University, The National Engineering University – Pablo Borbon Campus, Batangas City; Buhaynasapa Integrated National High School, San Juan, Batangas (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300632

Subject Category: Mathematics

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 8832-8846

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-02

Accepted: 2026-04-08

Published: 2026-04-22

Abstract

This study determined the learning styles and General Mathematics achievement of Grade 11 students in Congressional District 4 of Batangas Province for the School Year 2024-2025. The study used a quantitative-descriptive research design and utilized two instruments, Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and a researcher-made test. Three hundred sixty-four respondents were determined through the use of the Raosoft sample size calculator with a 5 percent margin of error.

Results revealed that the General Mathematics achievement of the students under the Academic and TVL Tracks falls under the category Did Not Meet Expectations. Most of the students under the Academic track prefer a Divergent Learning Style, while students in the TVL track prefer an Accommodating Learning Style. There is a significant association between the students’ learning styles and their Senior High School (SHS) Tracks, the Academic and TVL Tracks. However, there is no significant association between the General Mathematics achievement and the students’ learning styles. Consequently, the proposed Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) was based on the identified least mastered competencies in the General Mathematics test and the dominant learning styles of the Academic and TVL students.

Keywords

learning styles, General Mathematics achievement

Downloads

References

1. Akbar, S. (2020). Changes in learning style: Does it change? South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 14(2), 150–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alova, C.A.R., & Calanza-Alova, I.M.G. (2022). Academic Performance in General Mathematics of Grade 11 Students: A Brief Report. Academia Letters, Article 5567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Behiga, R. (2022). Issues with National Achievement Test (NAT) in the Philippines.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361229592_ISSUES_WITH_NATIONAL_ACHIEVEMENT_TEST_NAT_IN_THE_PHILIPPINES [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cabaces, C.J. (2024). Learning style, academic performance, and mathematics proficiency of grade 9 students in calaca district. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications. https://doi.org/10.61207/ARP-0324-5551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education. (2019). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/08/16/do-021-s-2019-policy-guidelines-on-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2024). National Achievement Test for Grade 12 results, Schools Division of Batangas [Excel file]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ignacio Jr, A. G., & Reyes, J. D. (2017). Exploring mathematics achievement goals using Kolb’s learning style model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 19-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mamolo, L. A. (2019). Analysis of senior high school students’ competency in general mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1938–1944. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Quinazo, M. S., Guma, M. J., Cervantes, J. D., Aparente, A. C., Ramirez, A. D., Toldo, L. G., Buo, M. G., & Recto, O. S., Jr. (2025). Assessing the learning style of senior high school TVL students using the Grasha–Riechmann model. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(11), 6843–6849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rañolas C. D. M., & Edig, M. M. N. (2025). The Mediating Role of Mathematics Self-concept in the Relationship between Academic Burnout and Mathematics Performance of Technical-Vocational Livelihood Track (TVL) Senior High School Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(6), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i62013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rohmanawati, E., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Analysis of students’ mathematical communication ability based on Kolb’s learning styles of converger and diverger type. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1808, No. 1, p. 012050). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Slater, J., & Hasson, R. (2025). Quantitative descriptive research design in educational studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 45–58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Villajuan, A.M. L. (2019). Relationship between learning styles and academic achievement in mathematics of Grade 8 students. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(4), 1052–1055. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.4419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles