Students’ Perceptions and Social Skills in Online and Face-to-Face Learning Among Higher Education Students
Authors
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Puncak Alam, Bandar Puncak Alam, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900125
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 1785-1791
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-10
Accepted: 2026-09-15
Published: 2026-10-03
Abstract
The different learning environments experienced by students may influence the way they communicate and interact with lecturers and peers. This study examined students’ perceptions of online and face-to-face learning and their social skills in both learning environments. It also examined the relationship between students’ perceptions and social skills and compared the findings between the two learning modes. A quantitative approach involved 174 students from the Faculty of Education at one university in Selangor, Malaysia. Data were obtained through a questionnaire using 5-point Likert scale and was analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and paired-samples t-test. The results showed a higher mean score for students’ perceptions of face-to-face learning (M = 4.13) than online learning (M = 3.49). A similar result was observed for social skills, with face-to-face learning recorded a mean score of 4.01 compared to 3.73 for online learning. Students’ perceptions were significantly and positively related to their social skills in online learning (r = .338, p < .001) and face-to-face learning (r = .808, p < .001). Significant differences were also identified between the two learning modes for both students’ perceptions and social skills. Overall, the results indicate that students responded more positively to face-to-face learning, particularly related to social interaction.
Keywords
online learning, face-to-face learning, social skills, students’ perceptions, higher education
Downloads
References
1. Abdul Latef, A. S., Muhammad, N. H., Radzuan, A. W., Hapiz, H. Y., Zain, M. Z. M., & Afendi, A. S. (2025). Adapting higher education through student perspectives on online distance and face-to-face learning. International Journal of Modern Education, 7(28), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.728040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alshammari, S. H., & Alrehaili, T. A. (2025). The effect of teaching, social, and cognitive presence on student engagement in online courses: A structural equation modelling approach. Acta Psychologica, 258, 105183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Castellanos-Reyes, D., Richardson, J. C., & Maeda, Y. (2024). The evolution of social presence: A longitudinal exploration of the effect of online students’ peer-interactions using social network analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 61, 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (2009). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Mokhtar, F. A., Arshad, S., Jamil, N. J., Zakaria, M. K., Wan Ibrahim, C. W. I. R. C., Shamsudin, C. M., Mohamed@Jaafar, S., & Awang, S. (2025). Teacher–student interactions in face-to-face and online learning: A sociocultural case study in Malaysian higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(12), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mykota, D. (2025). A meta-analysis study of social presence in higher education online environments. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2025.v40.i1.1351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Panjehfouladgaran, H., Stavropoulou, F., & Teimouri, M. (2024). How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected students’ online social presence? INFORMS Transactions on Education, 25(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Pujasari, R. S., Mujianto, J., Sukarno, & Astuti, P. (2025). Humanising online learning through social presence in higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 40(3), 633–670. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2025.40.3.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Teoh, S. H., Hong, J. B. Z., Md Shamsudin, N., Singh, P., & Hartono, R. (2025). Students’ engagement in a hybrid classroom: A comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2451497. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2451497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Tuntirojanawong, S. (2013). Students’ readiness for e-learning: A case study of Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 59–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Tratnik, A., Urh, M., & Jereb, E. (2017). Student satisfaction with an online and a face-to-face Business English course in a higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 36–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Yousaf, A., & Masood, S. (2024). Balancing virtual boundaries: Investigating the impact of online learning on socialization and social skill development. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(2), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i2.27031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Zainal, N. S., & Salim, S. A. (2024). Hubungan antara kemahiran sosial dan pembelajaran secara kolaboratif dalam talian di kalangan pelajar UTHM. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 5(1), 384–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar