Students’ Satisfaction and Perceived Efficiency of Dormitory Management in a Faith-Based Institution: A Quantitative Assessment

Authors

Wilhelm Bruce Salarda

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Mark Franciz Ortega

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Don Floreal Cabahug

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Jan Clyde Bala

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Prince Anthony Garcia

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Jhon Kenneth Generalao

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Micho Sulima

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Janisson Kim Cardeinte

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Marlon Tabaosares.

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Scott Lim Gahum

Mindanao Mission Academy, Manticao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200540

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 7509-7523

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-26

Accepted: 2026-03-03

Published: 2026-03-19

Abstract

This study aimed to assess students’ satisfaction and perceived institutional efficiency regarding dormitory management in a faith-based school. Using a descriptive correlational design, the research employed a census approach covering all dormitory residents and utilized a structured Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive statistics measured satisfaction and perception levels, while Pearson’s correlation determined their relationship. The findings revealed that both satisfaction and perception were at a moderate or neutral level, with safety rated the highest and responsiveness the lowest. Results also showed a strong, statistically significant positive correlation (r = 0.769, p < 0.001) between students’ satisfaction and perception, indicating that greater satisfaction associated with more favorable view of management efficiency. No significant differences were found when students were grouped by gender or grade level, suggesting uniformity in service quality and fairness of dormitory management. The study highlights the importance of responsiveness, professionalism, and fairness in sustaining positive student experiences and fostering trust in management. These findings provide valuable insights for faith-based institutions seeking to strengthen both administrative effectiveness and the spiritual-moral growth of dormitory residents.

Keywords

Dormitory management, student satisfaction, institutional efficiency

Downloads

References

1. Abucay, K. C. (2025). Knowledge and perception of dormitory students on green buildings. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 28(1), 45–56. https://www.ovcre.uplb.edu.ph/journals-uplb/index.php/JESAM/article/view/1438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akhondi, M. H., Shakeri, M., Barzegar Bafrooei, K., & Hassani, H. (2024). Male medical sciences students' perceptions of the positive aspects of dormitory life related to the quality of academic life: A phenomenological study. Journal of Medical Education Development, 17(56), 39-49. https://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-2146-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Altınay, F., Arslan, H., & Sharma, R. (2024). Assessing student satisfaction and institutional efficiency in dormitory management: A qualitative analysis based on student perspectives. Sustainability, 16(20), 8823. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aravena, J., Andersson, R., & Holmberg, U. (2024). Service quality and student satisfaction in Swedish housing facilities. Scandinavian Journal of Housing Research, 39(2), 115–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arslan, H., & Yilmaz, R. (2023). Correlates of dormitory satisfaction and differences involving gender. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(2), 145–158. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10199736/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arslan, M., Kaya, F., & Demir, R. (2024). Dormitory residents’ satisfaction and management practices: An assessment of service dimensions. International Journal of Student Housing Studies, 12(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Batara, O. A., & Orpia, C. (2022). Students’ satisfaction on housing services: Basis of management plan in the new normal. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v2i1.144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brilliantes, R. A., Aga, N. B., Tipace, F. C., Adegque, C. A., Perez, M. P., Aya-ay, A. M., & Sagarino, E. V. (2012). The living conditions of university students in boarding houses and dormitories in Davao City, Philippines. IAMURE: International Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 66–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Burkhardt, T. E. (2019). First-year students’ expectations of and satisfaction with residence hall housing (Doctoral dissertation). University of Dayton, Dayton, OH. Retrieved from https://ecommons.udayton.edu/graduate_theses/6783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Beder, D., & Imamoğlu, Ç. (2023). Correlates of dormitory satisfaction and differences involving social density and room locations. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199736/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, L., & Rivera, D. (2024). Assessing student satisfaction and institutional efficiency in dormitory management. Sustainability, 16(20), 8823. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dormitory Education from the Aspect of Effective Dormitory Management. (2024). Journal La Edusci, 5(2), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v5i2.1340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. De Araujo, P., & Murray, J. (2010). Estimating the effects of dormitory living on student performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1555892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. De Leon, M. T., & Velasco, J. B. (2017). Student safety and institutional enforcement in Philippine boarding houses. Philippine Journal of Student Services, 5(1), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gong, A., & Söderberg, B. (2023). Residential satisfaction in student housing: An empirical study in Stockholm, Sweden. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39, 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10089-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Grant, R. R. (2018). Student satisfaction related to the campus residential experience. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3607&context=etd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gunawan, H., Putri, S., & Ramadhan, A. (2023). Service quality and student satisfaction in Indonesian dormitories. Journal of Student Housing and Development, 15(3), 201–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gabbianelli, L., & Pencarelli, T. (2023). On-campus accommodation service quality: The mediating role of students’ satisfaction on word-of-mouth. The TQM Journal, 35(5), 1224-1255. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2022-0092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hou, H. C., et al. (2020). Gap theory based post-occupancy evaluation (GTbPOE) of student dormitory building performance. Building and Environment. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132320306831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Heasley, C. (2021). Community association: Exploring interaction effects between gender and student housing type. Journal of College & University Student Housing, 47(2), 62-83. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mahendri, W., Astuti, W., & Arifin, S. (2024). Enhancing student satisfaction through service quality and perceived value in Islamic boarding schools. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 7(12), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i12-33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Navarez, J. C. (2017, June 20–22). Student residential satisfaction in an on-campus housing facility. Paper presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2017, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/conferences/research-congress-proceedings/2017/LLI/LLI-I-006.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Phan, T. N., Do, M. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2023). On-campus accommodation service quality: The mediating role in students’ satisfaction. The TQM Journal, 35(5), 1224–1240. https://www.emerald.com/tqm/article/35/5/1224/376994/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Riski, A. (2025). Implementation of character education in the dormitory. Metodik Didaktik, 19(2), 122–135. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/MetodikDidaktik/article/view/50236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Radder, L., & Han, X. (2009). Service quality of on-campus student housing: A South African experience. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(11), 107-119. (Note: although pre-2015, often cited in more recent studies). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277566390 Service Quality_of_On_Campus_Student_Housing_A_South_African_Experience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Survey Questionnaire About the Hostel. (n.d.). Retrieved from Scribd: https://www.scribd.com/document/102122616/Survey-Questionnaire-About-the-Hostel Scribd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sihotang, H. M. W., Manullang, J. C., Sagala, P. N., Turnip, L., Sitorus, T. Y., & Lubis, N. I. (2025). Analysis of student satisfaction with facilities and infrastructure at the dormitory of Universitas Negeri Medan: A quantitative descriptive approach. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i2.802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sumangil, L. M., & Andal, M. V. (2022). Student trust and satisfaction in dormitory rule enforcement: A Social Exchange Theory approach. Asian Journal of Student Services, 8(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Syakbani, F. F., & Rahmiati, R. (2025). Application of Kano model for customer satisfaction analysis of health center service quality. Journal of Management and Administration Provision, 5(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v5i2.588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Siluyele, N., Nkonde, E., Mweemba, M., Kaluba, G., & Zulu, C. (2020). A survey on student preferences of facilities and models of accommodation at Kapasa Makasa University, Zambia. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(2). SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Gumela, F., & Tayaban, R. (2025). TIPSFI as an educational engagement program for youth in Mindanao. Davao Research Journal, 16(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v16i3.449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles