Supreme Audit Institutions, Audit Recommendation Implementation, and Public Sector Accountability: A Comparative Systematic Review of Ghana and South Africa

Authors

David Oppong

School of Business, Valley View University, Accra, Ghana (Ghana)

Evans O. N. D. Ocansey

School of Business, Valley View University, Accra, Ghana (Ghana)

Richard Bediako

School of Business, Valley View University, Accra, Ghana (Ghana)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800889

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 13012-13024

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-02

Accepted: 2026-09-07

Published: 2026-09-19

Abstract

Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) play a pivotal role in promoting transparency, strengthening public financial management, and enhancing accountability within the public sector. However, the effectiveness of public auditing depends not only on the production of audit reports but also on the successful implementation of audit recommendations. This study systematically reviews the literature on Supreme Audit Institutions, the implementation of audit recommendations, and public sector accountability through a comparative analysis of Ghana and South Africa. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) framework, the review synthesized evidence from 39 peer-reviewed studies, policy reports, and institutional publications published between 2010 and 2025. The findings reveal that while both countries possess constitutionally established SAIs with broad mandates for financial, compliance, and performance auditing, substantial differences exist in institutional independence, organizational capacity, enforcement mechanisms, and audit follow-up practices. South Africa demonstrates comparatively stronger institutional autonomy, financial independence, and legally enforceable audit follow-up systems, contributing to higher implementation of audit recommendations. In contrast, Ghana continues to face recurring challenges associated with political interference, resource constraints, weak enforcement, and inadequate coordination among oversight institutions, resulting in persistent audit findings across public institutions. The review further identifies political commitment, effective parliamentary oversight, organizational capacity, digital audit management systems, and transparent accountability mechanisms as critical determinants of successful implementation of audit recommendations. The study concludes that the effectiveness of Supreme Audit Institutions should be assessed not merely by the production of audit reports but by their ability to facilitate corrective action and improve governance outcomes. The review contributes to the public sector auditing literature by integrating institutional effectiveness with audit recommendation implementation and offers practical policy recommendations for strengthening accountability systems in Ghana, South Africa, and other African countries.

Keywords

Supreme audit institutions, Audit recommendation implementation, Public financial management, Public sector accountability, External auditing

Downloads

References

1. Afadzinu, S. K., Dávid, L. D., & Fayah, J. (2024). Exploring the challenges and barriers to implementing public auditor recommendations in Ghana’s public sector. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(12), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agyemang, S. K., Ohalehi, P., Mgbame, O. C., & Alo, K. (2022). Reducing occupational fraud through reforms in public sector audit: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(3), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2022-0066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Antwi, S., Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Oppong, D. (2025). International analysis of public sector accounting and fiscal governance: A systematic literature review. Open Access Library Journal, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Audit Service Act 2000. Retrieved from https://audit.gov.gh/files/publications/Audit_Service_Act _2000,_ Act_584615500996.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA). (2024). Integrated annual report 2023/2024: Elevating our insights to improve public sector accountability. Retrieved from https://nationalgovernment. co.za/entity_annual/3808/2024-auditor-general-south-africa-(agsa)-annual-report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bediako, R. Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Oppong, D. (2025). Accounting controls, governance, and anti-corruption in Ghana’s public sector. African Journal of Accounting and Financial Research 8(4), 59-76. DOI:10.52589/AJAFRBP8QZKVC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cape Times. (2025, September 5). Auditor-General warns: Accountability crisis fuels corruption in South Africa. Cape Times. https://capetimes.co.za/news/2025-09-05-auditor-general-warns-accountability-crisis-fuels-corruption-in-south-africa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Constitution of South Africa 1996, Chapter 9 (Sections 181–188). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Constitution of the Republic of Ghana 1992 (Articles 187–189). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cordery, C. J., & Hay, D. (2019). Supreme audit institutions and public value: Demonstrating relevance. Financial Accountability and Management, 35(2), 128-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hatchard, J. (2019). The role, independence and accountability of the Auditor General: A comparative constitutional analysis. The Denning Law Journal, 30(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. INTOSAI. (2019). Follow-up to external audit recommendations: Summary of practices. FAOHome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Matlala, L. S., & Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2020). Factors influencing the implementation of the Auditor-General’s recommendations in South African municipalities. African Evaluation Journal, 8(1), a464. https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v8i1.464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ocansey, E. O. N. D., Oppong, D., & Antwi, S. (2025). The influence of globalization on public sector accounting practices in developing countries: A systematic review. African Journal of Accounting and Financial Research 8(3), 117-132. DOI:10.52589/AJAFRAQLWBERP [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD (2020), Development Co-operation Report 2020: Learning from Crises, Building Resilience, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f6d42aa5-en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Oppong, D., Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Antwi, S. (2025a). Public sector audit effectiveness: A critical review of Ghana’s surcharge and disallowance regime. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e13860. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oppong, D., Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Bediako, R. (2025b). Systematic literature review of audit irregularities in Ghana’s public sector. Journal of Accounting 7(2), 66-86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Pimpong, S. P. (2020). Addressing challenges of Supreme Audit Institutions: The case of the Office of the Auditor-General in Ghana. International Journal on Governmental Financial Management, 20(1), 20–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Public Audit Act 2004. Retrieved from https://www.saflii.org/ | info@saflii.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thusi, X., & Matyana, M. (2024). Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) as an oversight body in the local government sphere. Insights Into Regional Development, 6(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2024.6.2(9) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Bank. (2024). Public financial management and audit follow-up in Ghana: Country assessment. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ghana/publication/pfm-audit-follow-up [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles