Tax Data, Immigration Enforcement, and the Privacy of Voluntary Compliance: The IRS–ICE Data-Sharing Controversy and Its Comparative Implications Across Five Common Law Jurisdictions-2026

In early 2026, the United States government entered into a data-sharing arrangement between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that would permit immigration authorities to access federal tax return information for the purpose of locating undocumented immigrants. In March 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was urged to maintain a district court injunction blocking the arrangement in Center for Taxpayer Rights et al., v. IRS et al., No. 26-5006. This article provides the first comprehensive legal and comparative analysis of the IRS–ICE arrangement. It examines the statutory framework governing taxpayer confidentiality under §6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, evaluates the agreement’s compatibility with the United States’ voluntary tax compliance architecture, and analyzes its constitutional implications under the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. The paper further situates the controversy within a comparative framework by examining how Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom have approached and uniformly rejected the use of tax authority data for immigration enforcement purposes. The article argues that the use of tax return data for immigration enforcement undermines the legal and institutional foundations of voluntary compliance, imposes substantial and under-acknowledged fiscal costs, and raises rule-of-law concerns that extend far beyond immigration policy. By eroding the confidentiality compact between the state and taxpayers, the IRS–ICE arrangement threatens the integrity of the tax system itself.

Taxpayer Confidentiality; Internal Revenue Code §6103; IRS–ICE Data Sharing; Voluntary Tax Compliance; Immigration Enforcement

1. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). IRS–ICE Data Sharing Legal Challenge Brief (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). IRS–ICE Data Sharing Litigation Brief (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Data Governance Report (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Australia. Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canada Revenue Agency. Confidentiality and Data Governance Policy (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canada Revenue Agency. Data Governance and Confidentiality Guidance (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Canada. Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp.) s 241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Center for Taxpayer Rights et al., v. IRS et al., No. 26-5006 (D.C. Cir. 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Federal Revenue and Compliance Sensitivity Report (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Federal Revenue Sensitivity to Compliance Changes (2025 technical update). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (UK) s 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Data Protection Act 2018 (UK). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). Compliance and Confidentiality Guidance (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). Taxpayer Confidentiality Guidance (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Internal Revenue Code §6103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). ITIN Program Statistics and Filing Data (2025 update). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. IRS Office of Chief Counsel. Disclosure Guidance on Return Information (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. IRS Office of Chief Counsel. Disclosure of Return Information Guidance (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kevin Pinner. “DC Circuit Urged to Maintain Block on IRS–ICE Data Sharing.” Law360 (Mar. 20, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. National Taxpayer Advocate. 2026 Annual Report to Congress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. National Taxpayer Advocate. 2026 Annual Report to Congress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. New Zealand Privacy Commissioner. Immigration Data and Public Trust Report (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. Government Data Governance and Function Creep Report (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. OECD. Rule of Law Indicators and Governance Review (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. OECD. Tax Administration 2025: Comparative Information on OECD and Selected Non-OECD Countries (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Privacy Act 2020 (New Zealand), Information Privacy Principle 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tax Policy Center. Revenue Effects of Reduced ITIN Filing (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tax Policy Center. Revenue Effects of Reduced ITIN Filing (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. Information Management Policy Update (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Public Sector Data Sharing Guidance (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. U.S. Constitution, amends. I, IV, V. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study