Teacher Support and Self-Efficacy Mediated by Learning Behavior of Key Stage 2 Learners in Calape District: Bases for Action Plan
Authors
School of Advanced Studies Bohol Island State University- Clarin Campus (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0251
Subject Category: Special Issue in Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3187-3195
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-27
Accepted: 2026-05-02
Published: 2026-05-19
Abstract
Students' academic success is significantly influenced by teacher support, learning behavior, and self-efficacy, which enhances overall performance, encourages active engagement, and fosters confidence. This investigation investigated the predictive correlation between self-efficacy, learning behavior, and teacher support among Key Stage 2 students in the Calape District. In particular, it examined the impact of the four dimensions of teacher support (instrumental, affective, informational, and appraisal) on students' self-efficacy, with learning behavior serving as a mediating variable. A quantitative, non-experimental mediation research design was implemented. Randomly selected from a population of 1,842 Key Stage 2 learners in 19 public elementary schools in the Calape District during the School Year 2025–2026, the respondents were 319 Grade 5 learners. Data were collected using modified standardized instruments, including the Perceived Teacher Support Scale (PTSS), Learning Behavior Questionnaire (LBQ), and Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C). The instruments exhibited satisfactory reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.65 to 0.973. Variable levels were determined using the weighted mean and standard deviation, and relationships were investigated using regression and mediation analyses. The results of the study indicated that teacher support was perceived as extremely high (M = 3.79, SD = 0.41), learning behavior was highly positive (M = 3.42, SD = 0.72), and self-efficacy was high (M = 3.28, SD = 0.74). Teacher support did not have a statistically significant direct effect on self-efficacy, as indicated by the regression results (B = 0.080, p =.252). Nevertheless, teacher support substantially predicted learning behavior (B = 0.379, p <.001), which in turn had a strong and significant effect on self-efficacy (B = 0.803, p <.001). The mediation analysis confirmed a substantial indirect effect (B = 0.305, p <.001), suggesting that learning behavior completely mediates the relationship between teacher support and self-efficacy. These results indicate that teacher support indirectly improves students' self-efficacy by encouraging positive learning behaviors, including persistence, engagement, and active participation. Consequently, a structured and process-oriented approach that commences with the reinforcement of classroom learning behaviors through effective teacher support is necessary to enhance students' confidence. A proposed action plan is based on the findings and will concentrate on the following: (1) enhancing the capacity of teachers to provide multidimensional support, (2) implementing classroom strategies that encourage active learning behaviors, (3) conducting learner engagement programs to foster confidence, and (4) establishing continuous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. The ultimate objective of these initiatives is to improve academic achievement by increasing student engagement and self-efficacy. It is advised that future research include a variety of districts to ensure a broader generalizability and to incorporate qualitative methods to obtain a more profound understanding of the experiences and perceptions of learners.
Keywords
Teacher Support, Self-Efficacy, Learner Behavior, Mediation, Key Stage 2
Downloads
References
1. Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press. https://books.google.com.ph/books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Brandisauskiene, A., Buksnyte-Marmiene, L., Cesnaviciene, J., & Jarasiunaite-Fedosejeva, G. (2023). The Relationship Between Teacher’s Autonomy-Supportive Behavior and Learning Strategies Applied by Students: The Role of Teacher Support and Equity. Sage Open, 13(2), 21582440231181384. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chen, J. J.-L. (2005). Relation of Academic Support From Parents, Teachers, and Peers to Hong Kong Adolescents’ Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Academic Engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chen, X., Zhao, H., & Zhang, D. (2022). Effect of teacher support on Adolescents’ positive academic emotion in China: Mediating role of psychological Suzhi and general self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cherewick, M., Hipp, E., Njau, P., & Dahl, R. E. (2023). Growth mindset, persistence, and self-efficacy in early adolescents: Associations with depression, anxiety, and externalising behaviours. Global Public Health, 18(1), 2213300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2213300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Conner M. & Norman P. (2015). Predicting and changing health Behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 245–269). Open University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=pMkvEAAAQBAJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Duan, H., Zhao, W., Zhang, Z., Tao, J., Xu, X., Cheng, N., & Guo, Q. (2024). The effect of teacher support on the sustainable online academic self-efficacy of College Students: The Mediating effect of Academic pocrastination. Sustainability, 16(5), 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Djuasa, J. G., & Widhiarso, W. (2019). The role of parental and teacher support on academic achievement as a mediator of academic self-efficacy. Gadjah Mada University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Uçak, E., & Bağ, H. (2022). Elementary school pupils’ self-efficacy towards science and technology lesson. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(2), 215–225. Scientia Socialis, UAB . (2012). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Filippello, P., Buzzai, C., Costa, S., Orecchio, S., & Sorrenti, L. (2020). Teaching style and academic achievement: The mediating role of learned helplessness and mastery orientation. Psychology in the Schools, 57(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gong, W., & Xu, C. (2024). Teacher support as predictors of Chinese EFL learners’ classroom flow: the mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1452146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1452146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gopez, B., & Ma. Agatha Anne Guintu. (2025). A Review Paper on Teacher Autonomy Support, Student Engagement, and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 20(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.54097/qkrxj681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Guess, P. E., & McCane-Bowling, S. J. (2016). Teacher Support and Life Satisfaction: An Investigation With Urban, Middle School Students. Education and Urban Society, 48(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513514604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Haryanto, S., Jumumini, S., Samsudin, A., Winarto, W., & Sunarko, A. (2024). Science the influence of teacher support and parental monitoring on academic achievement in high school students: The role of academic self-concept as a moderating variable. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(4), 2025169. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hasanah, R. (2019). The influence of support from parents, teachers, peer interactions on academic achievement through student engagement in basic accounting subjects. Malang State University [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hung, M.-T., Hung, L.-C., & Smith, C. S. (2025). Teacher Support and Intrinsic Motivation: The Mediating Roles of Enjoyment, Anxiety, and Self-efficacy. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157304/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2015). Social cognitive theory. Fac Health Sci Publ, 2015, 225-251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). The Relationship between Teacher Support and Students’ Academic Emotions: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Li, X., Wang, Z., & Xie, J. (2024). The mediating role of intention of learning behaviour in learning behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1228783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1228783 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mabanag, C. B. A., Dinglasa, G. A. G., Buna, D. V. M., Lumahang, J. N., Ladera, D. L. E., Saldo, I. J. P., & Cabrejas, M. M. (2025). Parental Involvement, Learning Behavior and its Effects on the Academic Performance of the Grade 12 Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(5), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i51912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2023). Teacher Autonomy Support Influence on Online Learning Engagement: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231217737. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Moskotina, R. (2025). Bridging Beliefs and Behavior: How Self-Efficacy and Learning Efforts Translate Locus of Control into Academic Performance. Sociological Studios, 1(26), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2025-01-34-34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(3), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010961119608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Ozioko, O. S. (2023). Relationship between self- efficacy, interpersonal relationship and learning behaviour. Newport International Journal of Law, Communication and Languages, 3(1), 18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18(4), 315-341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Republic of the Philippines. (1987). The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. a. Philippines. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/Republic-act-no-9155/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Rudzani Israel LUMADI. (2025). Impact of Learner Behavior on Academic Performance: Leadership Strategies for Classroom Dynamics and Discipline Management. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15804550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Sumastre, M. F., & Oco, R. M. (2025). Teachers’ classroom management practices and pupils’ self-Efficacy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 8(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i04-13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tergravida, B. A., & Juwarini Prihastiwi, W. (2023). Perceived teacher support on student engagement through self-efficacy as a mediator in elementary school students’ mathematics lesson. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 4(2), 85-96. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmetp/issue/81482/1367735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Thomas, D., & Zubkov, P. (2021). Quantitative research designs. In Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Chapter 6) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Wati, M., Johar, R., Ramli, M., & Mailizar. (2025). Validity of Student Learning Behavior Questionnaire. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251351441. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251351441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Wilson, J. H., & Joye, S. W. (2016). Research methods and statistics: An integrated approach. SAGE Publications Wu, J., Yan, Z., Yang, Y., Zhu, J., Xiong, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). The perceived teacher support scale (PTSS) for students: Development and psychometric studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 128, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Wu, J., Yan, Z., Yang, Y., Zhu, J., Xiong, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). The perceived teacher support scale (PTSS) for students: Development and psychometric studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 128, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Yang, L., & Lian, L. H. (2025). The influence of perceive teacher support on high school students’ learning engagement in China. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(1), 575. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i1.29898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. You, S., Kim, E. K., Lim, S. A., & Dang, M. (2021). Student and teacher Characteristics on student Math Achievement. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 1834490921991428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921991428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Zhang, Z. (2025). The impact of teacher support on students’ learning interest. SHS Web of Conferences, 222, 04011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522204011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]