Teachers’ Acceptance and Tolerance of AI Generated/Assisted Student Work

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in education has transformed how students produce academic outputs and how teachers evaluate them. This study examines teachers’ perceptions, acceptance, tolerance, challenges, and countermeasures regarding AI-assisted student work in Philippine secondary schools. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from 20 public secondary school teachers across various subject areas through semi-structured interviews administered via Google Forms. Thematic analysis was applied to identify recurring patterns and sentiments, providing insights into how educators balance innovation with academic integrity. Findings show that teachers detect AI use through stylistic discrepancies and cognitive mismatches, such as sudden improvements in grammar, vocabulary, and coherence that do not align with a student’s typical performance. Acceptance of AI is conditional, with teachers allowing its use as a scaffold for learning—particularly for grammar checking, idea organization, and brainstorming—provided students demonstrate transparency and accountability. Tolerance is framed by clear pedagogical rules, with educators permitting AI use in low-stakes tasks under disclosure requirements and process-based evidence. However, challenges persist, particularly a crisis of authenticity and cognitive ownership, as polished AI outputs often mask diminished creativity and critical thinking. To address these issues, teachers employ countermeasures such as requiring multiple drafts, oral defenses, contextualized tasks, and process-based assessments, thereby restoring the human element in learning.
This study emphasizes that teachers’ responses to AI are shaped by conditional frameworks that balance innovation with integrity. It recommends institutional policies and training programs that support ethical AI use, strengthen teacher competence, and embed accountability measures to ensure AI remains a supplementary aid rather than a replacement for authentic student effort.

Artificial Intelligence, Teacher Perceptions, Acceptance, Tolerance, Countermeasure

1. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Is AI changing the rules of academic misconduct? An in-depth look at students’ perceptions of “AI-giarism.” arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.03358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Co, S. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15902949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Co, S. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15902949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Copyleaks. (2026, March 18). What educators should know about AI detection in 2026. https://copyleaks.com/blog/what-educators-should-know-about-ai-detection-in-202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (n.d.). Talk is Cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GENAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift. Journal of Namibian Studies History Politics Culture, 33. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.2791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Duhaylungsod, F. J., & Chavez, R. (2025). Academic integrity in peril: Teachers' experiences towards generative artificial intelligence. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(7). https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ethics of artificial intelligence. (2026, March 12). AI | UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fabito, B. S., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/15902950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Feldman-Maggor, Y., Cukurova, M., Kent, C. et al. The Impact of Explainable AI on Teachers’ Trust and Acceptance of AI EdTech Recommendations: The Power of Domain-specific Explanations. Int J Artif Intell Educ 35, 2889–2922 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00486-6a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Filgueiras, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence and education governance. Education Citizenship and Social Justice, 19(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979231160674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gamage, K. A., Dehideniya, S. C. P., Xu, Z., & Tang, X. (n.d.). ChatGPT and higher education assessments: More opportunities than concerns? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.32 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J., Baker, P. R., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Han, J., Yang, Y., & Liu, G. (2025). Are teachers assessing work written by students or by AI ? A rapid literature review of research on detecting content generated by generative AI. European Journal of Education, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Henry, J.V., Oliver, M. Who Will Watch the Watchmen? The Ethico-political Arrangements of Algorithmic Proctoring for Academic Integrity. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 330–353 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00273-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Langreo, J. V. (2026b, February 3). Rising use of AI in schools comes with big downsides for students. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/rising-use-of-ai-in-schools-comes-with-big-downsides-for-students/2025/10#:~:text=Other%20big%20concerns%20also%20showed,conducted%20between%20June%20and%20August [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lin, X. (2026, December 24). Technology-Enhanced Writing Pedagogy for EFL Learners: A Multi-Study Dissertation on Practice, Effectiveness, and Teacher Perceptions. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bf8j2r7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lin, X. (2026b, December 24). Technology-Enhanced Writing Pedagogy for EFL Learners: A Multi-Study Dissertation on Practice, Effectiveness, and Teacher Perceptions. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1bf8j2r7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lucero, D. B. (2025). The lived experiences of teachers in detecting AI generated content in students’ written outputs in private schools of Bislig City. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(47s), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i47s.9259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Manalang, A. (2026). More and more teachers and students are using AI, even though it can be problematic. Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2026-03-teachers-students-ai-good.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Omar Ali, Peter A. Murray, Mujtaba Momin, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Tegwen Malik, The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 199, 2024, 123076, ISSN 0040-1625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tumapon, T. T., & Silagan, B. L. (2025). Technological Competence, Training and Support, Attitude Towards AI, and Teachers’ Acceptance. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=32547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools among Senior High School Students: Inputs for Policy Recommendations – International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI). (n.d.). https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/utilization-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-tools-among-senior-high-school-students-inputs-for-policy-recommendations/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). What Explains Teachers’ Trust of AI in Education across Six Countries? arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2312.01627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study