Teachers’ Adaptations to Administrative Shifts: The Experiences of Filipino Teachers in Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia

Authors

Mokaliden Sali Aron

Researcher, Graduate School, Notre Dame University, Cotabato (Philippines)

Danilo Daclan Caburnay

Researcher/School Principal, Senior High School, Notre Dame University, Cotabato (Philippines)

Maria Araceli Carrasco-Juliano

Researcher/Dean, Graduate School, Notre Dame University, Cotabato (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400011

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 121-139

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-01

Accepted: 2026-04-07

Published: 2026-04-24

Abstract

This study explored the teachers’ adaptations to administrative shifts in Al-Hassa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which focused on changes in organizational practices, management principles, and school policies. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, semi-structured online interviews were conducted among purposively selected Filipino teachers with at least one school year of teaching experience. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis using NVivo software to identify recurring patterns and emerging themes related to administrative shifts, professional growth, roles and responsibilities, teaching, and cultural integration. Findings revealed that Filipino teachers moved from flexible to structured systems with centralized scheduling, collaborative planning, multilingual communication, and technology integration, which developed accountability, efficiency, and expectations to institutional goals. Teachers showed resilience through time management, peer collaboration, mentorship, and continuous professional learning despite challenges such as language barriers and curriculum changes. Complying to local norms indicated cultural sensitivity and fostered smooth integration into the new working environment. Moreover, teachers’ confidence, engagement, and performance were strengthened through supportive leadership, clear policy communication, and motivational practices. The study highlights that structured administrative support along with teachers’ adaptations transform challenges into opportunities for innovation, skill development, and professional advancement. It emphasizes the significance of orientation, mentorship, lifelong learning, and mindset preparation as key strategies for sustainable adaptation. These findings provide a model for enhancement of effective onboarding and support systems that help teacher retention, well- being, and productivity in multicultural educational contexts.

Keywords

Teachers’ Adaptations; Administrative Shifts; Filipino teachers

Downloads

References

1. Abdulcader, A.; Alharbi, M.; Alshammari, S. Administrative Adaptation and Teacher Competence in International School Contexts. International Journal of Educational Development 2025, 102, 102845. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Dossary, R., Rahman, S. M., & Almutairi, A. F. (2021). Leadership practices and educational reform in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 789–803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alkhatani, M. The Influence of Educational Leadership on Teaching Practices in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice 2015, 6, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almutairi, A., Al-Shammari, Z., & Al-Anzi, F. (2018). Cultural integration of international teachers in Saudi schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(12), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alshahrani, A. (2020). The role of technology in enhancing teaching practices in international classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 4–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aslan, H., Beycioglu, K., & Konan, N. (2015). Administrative problem-solving and organizational effectiveness in schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 355–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balderas, J. L. (2021). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effects of COVID-19 on Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University-Kingsville). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bautista, A., Wong, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2025). Teacher adaptation and reflective practices in international contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Brophy, J., Alleman, J., & Halvorsen, A. (2015). Powerful social studies for elementary students. Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bunnell, T. (2014). The changing landscape of international schooling: Implications for theory and practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cameron, K. S., & Cameron, M. (2021). Positive leadership and its impact on teacher development. Journal of Educational Change, 22(3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, L. Teacher Adaptability and Cross-Cultural Adjustment in International Schools. Teaching and Teacher Education 2024, 132, 104256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Collie, R. J. (2021). Teacher well-being and organizational support in educational settings. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cuenca, A. (2019). Teacher autonomy and feedback systems in international schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Darby, S. M. (2024). Teacher leadership and professional efficacy in school reform. Educational Leadership Review, 25(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dela Cruz, J. (2018). Filipino teachers’ adaptation to international school standards. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 345–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Diokno, M., De Guzman, A., & Umali, R. (2020). Filipino teachers’ adaptability in international teaching environments. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(2), 56–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gadusova, Z., Hašková, A., & Predanocyová, Ľ. (2017). Teachers’ professional competencies in international educational contexts. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gay, G. (2023). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gilbang, M., Santos, R., & Cruz, P. (2024). Communication challenges among Filipino teachers in GCC countries. International Journal of Education Research, 120, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gul, H., & Gokce, A. (2020). Turkish teachers’ adaptation challenges in European schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(6), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hadiyanto, H. Student-Centered Learning Approaches and 21st-Century Skills in TEFL Classrooms. Education Sciences 2025, 15, 210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Halicoglu, M. (2015). International teaching experience and professional development. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(3), 273–284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hendarman. (2018). Educational leadership and organizational culture in schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 3(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ho, D., Nguyen, T., & Pham, L. (2023). Classroom management adaptation in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Howard, S. K., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2016). More than beliefs: Subject areas and teachers’ integration of technology. Computers & Education, 95, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jingyi, X., & De Dios, A. (2025). Multicultural integration and future pathways: an analysis of Chinese language education policies and practices in Philippine public secondary schools. Current Issues in Language Planning, 26(2), 139-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Khalifa, M., Gooden, M., & Davis, J. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kim, L. E. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and organizational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kwon, K. (2018). Teacher turnover in international schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Le, T., & Pham, H. (2024). Emotional competence and teaching effectiveness among EFL teachers. Asian Journal of Education, 45(2), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Liu, Y., Bellibas, M., & Gumus, S. (2021). The impact of instructional leadership on teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 423–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Loewen, S., Sato, M., & Ellis, R. (2020). Multilingual support in international education. TESOL Quarterly, 54(2), 350–376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Luong, T., Nguyen, H., & Tran, P. (2025). Intercultural competence in global education. Journal of International Education Research, 21(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Magliveras, K. (2019). Cultural and legal frameworks in Middle Eastern education. Middle East Education Review, 11(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Marno, R. (2018). Administrative roles in teacher professional development. Educational Management Journal, 12(3), 145–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Masry-Herzallah, A., & Stavissky, Y. (2021). Communication and leadership in multicultural schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 635–652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Masry-Herzallah, A., Arar, K., & Haj-Yehia, K. (2024). Multicultural leadership and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Meyer, J. (2021). Feedback and teacher motivation in schools. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 789–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Muller, L., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2019). Professional learning communities and teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Nguyen, T.; Pham, L.; Nguyen, H (2020). Teacher Responses to Administrative Change and Professional Development in Public Schools. Asia Pacific Education Review 2020, 21, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. OECD. (2020). Education in Saudi Arabia: Vision 2030 reforms. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Opfer, V. D., Pedder, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2020). The role of teacher orientation in professional learning. Educational Research Review, 30, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ospina, S., Esteve, J., & Lee, S. (2020). Filipino teachers in the U.S.: Adaptation and challenges. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 456–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rammata, M. (2017). Administrative frameworks in international schools. International Education Studies, 10(9), 23–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Robertson, J., Line, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2016). Cultural diversity and teacher preparedness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Schlossberg, N. K. (1984). Counseling adults in transition: Linking practice with theory. Springer Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Schmid, E. (2023). Distributed leadership in international schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(2), 215–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Siagian, S. (2017). Organizational behavior in education. Educational Management Journal, 9(2), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy: Relations and consequences. In Educator stress: An occupational health perspective (pp. 101-125). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Tortola, E. (2024). Resilience and coping among expatriate teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Tran, T., Nguyen, H., & Pham, L. (2021). Teacher workload and role ambiguity. Educational Review, 73(5), 605–620. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tran, T., Le, H., & Nguyen, M. (2023). Workload and stress among international teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Wang, Q., Hallinger, P., & Chen, L. (2020). Teacher participation in school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 845–865. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Yan, C. (2021). Mentoring immigrant teachers in host countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Yi, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. (2020). Localization and teacher adaptation in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 74, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on digital learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Zevin, J. (2015). Social studies for the twenty-first century. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2024). Mentorship programs in international schools. Journal of Educational Research, 117(1), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles