Teachers’ Perception towards the Implementation of Inclusive Education in Two Selected Primary Schools of Chipata District, Zambia

Zambia is among many countries that has shown commitment towards the implementation of inclusive education following the Salamanca conference of the 1994. However, there are few researches on the teachers’ perception towards the implementation of inclusive education. The study was conducted at two selected primary schools of Chipata district. The objective of this study was; to explore the teachers’ perception towards the implementation of inclusive education in two selected primary schools. The sampling procedure used in the study was Purposive and Quota sampling technique. Primary data was obtained through unstructured interview guide, observation checklist and focused group discussion guide. The Education standard officer- Special Education, School Administrators, Teachers, learners with and without disabilities formed 39 sample of this study. Data analysis was through thematic analysis. The major findings of the study were that the teachers had negative perception towards the implementation of inclusive education and this reflected in failure of accepting learners with disabilities in the two primary schools The findings showed strong consensus of teachers’ negative perception such as lack of having pedagogical skills, having negative attitude, lack of training in special and inclusive education, and they were just following the imposed policy, they lacked formal qualifications and specialized experience as key barriers to implementing inclusive education and affected learners and led to learning barriers and communication, lack of emotional safety and had communication fear. The researcher recommended a similar study on teachers’ perception towards the implementation of inclusive education could be carried out in Kalulushi district of copper belt province of Zambia in order to compare the current research findings with what will be discovered.

Teachers, Perception, Implementation

1. Africa Development Fund (2003). “Education Sector Support Project Appraisal Report”. Nairobi: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chilufya, J. (2005). Parents’ and teacher’attitudes towards inclusive Education in selected Basic Schools of Kalulushi District of Zambia. Lusaka: University of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Clark, A and Bagnoli, A. (2010). Focus group with young people: A participatory approach to research planning. Journal of youth studies, Vol.13, No. 1 February 2010. 101-119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Elder, B. C. (2015). Right to inclusive Education for Students with Disabilities in Kenya. Journal of international special Needs Education, Vol. 18, No.1 pp 18-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2004). “National Policy on Education.” (4thed). Yaba logos: NERDC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Germany Disabilities Council. (2013). “the report submitted to the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of Human Rights of People with Disabilities in federal republic of Germany.” Düsseldorf: OHCHR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hunter-J, Y. and Newton, N.G.L. (2014). What does Teachers’ Perception Have to do with Inclusive Education: A Bahamian context. International Journal of Special Education: Vol. 29. No: 1, 2014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Government of Zambia. (2012). “Persons with Disability Act, 2012”. [No. 6 of 2012]. Lusaka. GRZ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kabir, S.M.S. (2016). Methods of Data Collection. ISBN: 978-984-33-9565-8, Chittagong-4203, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kumatongo, B. and Muzata, K.K (2021). Research Paradigms and Designs with their Applications in Education. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology. Vol.5. NO.1 (2021ISSN - Print: 2517-9306; Online: 2664-0899. https://journals.unza.zm/index.php/jlt [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kumar, R. (2005). Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3ed). London: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Majid. U. (2018) Research fundamentals: Study Design, Population, and Sample Size. Undergraduate research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal. https://www.urncst.com . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of Education (1996). “National Policy on Education: Educating our future.” Lusaka: MOGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ministry of General Education (2016). “Inclusive Education and Special Education in Zambia: Implementation Guidelines.” Lusaka: MOGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Monique, M.H and Bonnie, N.K. (2019). Saturation in Qualitative Research. London; Sage Publication Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Muzata, K.K., Musukwa, N., Kumatongo. (2021). Barriers to the inclusive of Learners with Hearing impairments: A review of Literature on Zambia. Journal of humanities and Social Sciences Vol.1, No. 3 (2021) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. National Committee on Education Services (1997). “Report on Education Services”. Mbabane: MOET [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ndhlovu, D. (2008). Challenges faced by pupils with Disabilities in accessing Education in inclusive schools in Zambia. Lusaka: University of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ngulube, Y.J. and Njelesani, D. (2020) Implementation of inclusive Education Policy in Secondary Schools in Zambia. Zambia interdisciplinary Journal of Education. (ZIJE) Online-ISSN 2710-0715. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Resnik. D, B. (2020). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important. London: National institutes of Environment Health Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ruslin., Mashuri. S., Rasak. M.S.A., Alhabsvi. F and Syam. H. (2022) Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Swart, E., Engelbrecht, P., Eloff, I and Pettipher, R. (2002). Implementing inclusive education in South Africa: teachers’ attitudes and experiences. Acta Academica. 34(1): 175-189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Stubbs, S. (2002). www.eenet.org.uk/resources/dues/IE few resources 2008: Retrieved on 25/12/2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Travers, J., Baife. T., Butler, C., Day., Dupont, M., McDaid, R., O’Donnell, M., Prunty, A., (2010). Addressing the Challenges and Barriers to inclusive in Irish Schools. Dublin: Special Education Department, St Patrick’s College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. United Nations Educational Scientific Cultural Organisation (1994). “The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Need Education.” Salamanca; UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations. (2007). “United National Convention on the protection of the rights and dignity of people with disabilities.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study