Teachers’ Professional Development Needs and Instructional Competence: The Moderating Role of Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles

This study examined the moderating role of Honey and Mumford learning styles on the relationship between professional development (PD) needs and instructional competence among public school teachers in the Division of Tangub City. A descriptive correlational design with moderation analysis was employed, involving 200 teachers (86% female, 60% aged 35–54 years). PD needs were assessed using a PPST aligned survey (1–5 scale), instructional competence was measured through Classroom Observation Tool (COT) ratings (3–7 scale), and learning styles were determined using the Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire. Findings revealed that the highest PD needs were in Curriculum and Planning (M=3.86, High Need) and Diversity of Learners (M=3.73, High Need), while instructional competence was consistently Satisfactory to Very Satisfactory (M range 5.05–5.55). The dominant learning style was Theorist (M=3.91). There was no significant relationship between PD needs and instructional competence (r=0.010, p=0.890). Honey and Mumford learning styles did not significantly moderate this relationship (interaction p=0.097), nor did the moderating effect differ significantly across the four styles (ANOVA p=0.312). The study concludes that matching PD to learning styles is unlikely to improve instructional competence. Therefore, the Division should implement a unified, evidence based PD program focused on Curriculum and Planning and Diversity of Learners, and complement COT ratings with multiple sources of evaluation. Investing in learning style based personalization is not supported by the data.

professional development needs, instructional competence, learning styles, moderation

1. Darling Hammond, L. (2020). Meta analysis of observation based teacher evaluation systems [Unpublished raw data]. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dela Cruz, R. (2021). Training needs analysis for Senior High School teachers in the Division of [Location]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Philippine Normal University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dela Cruz, R., & Santos, M. (2021). Professional development needs of public school teachers in Central Luzon. Philippine Journal of Education, 104(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Duff, A., & Duffy, T. (2002). Psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 147–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Espina, E. (2021). Teaching competencies and professional development activities: A correlational study in a Philippine university. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garcia, L., & Fernandez, R. (2019). Assessment literacy among Filipino teachers: Self perceived competence and training gaps. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(1), 23–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (3rd ed.). Peter Honey Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rivera, T. (2025). Are teacher training programs in the Philippines still too generic? Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) Policy Notes, No. 2025 02. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rivera, T., & Ador, M. (2022). Classroom Observation Tool ratings in Philippine divisions: A case of persistent ceiling effects. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2022 18. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Romo, J. (2025). Multigrade teaching experience in Ilocos Sur: Demographics, training, and professional [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. needs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 8(1), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sario, J., & Uy, F. (2020). Professional development needs of teachers in Surigao del Sur: A PPST based analysis. Journal of Philippine Local Governance, 5(2), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. West, J., & Solar, C. (2025). Assessing teachers’ pedagogy, curriculum and assessment adherence to the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 24(1), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Willingham, D. T. (2015). Does tailoring instruction to learning styles help students learn? American Federation of Teachers. https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2015/willingham [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study