Teaching Approaches of Gen Z Teachers in Early Childhood Education
Authors
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University Mid La Union Campus College of Education Bachelor of Early Childhood Education City of San Fernando, La Union (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200284
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 3914-3919
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-19
Accepted: 2026-02-24
Published: 2026-03-07
Abstract
This study examined the approaches used by Generation Z (Gen Z) educators in Early Childhood Education (ECE) and how these strategies are used and understood to influence the young students. Based on a qualitative phenomenological design, ten (10) Gen Z teachers were interviewed using semi-structured interviews and using Braun and Clarke (2006) thematic analysis to analyze the data. Results indicated that Gen Z teachers mostly use technology integrated, play, experiential and learner centered methods to support engagement and developmentally suitable learning experiences. The practices help in cognitive, social-emotional and behavioral development of children as well as encourage active involvement and significance of interaction. The paper indicates the significance of sustaining innovative and inclusive practices in early childhood education that is supported by professional development and institutional policies to help teachers in Gen Z.
Keywords
Early Childhood Education, Generation Z Teachers, Teaching Approach, Use of technology, Play Based Learning, Learner based instruction.
Downloads
References
1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2021). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 25(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Dong, C., & Newman, L. (2021). Ready, steady… pause: Integrating technology into early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 191(13), 2080–2093. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1764833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Flores, I., Abat, M. C., Duran, K. M., Galboy, C., & Ong Jr., D. (2025). Investigating the effects of learning by discovery on the environmental skills of day care students using EcoExplorer. Diversitas Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i2.3352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kim, H., & Park, S. (2023). Autonomy-supportive teaching and student engagement in early childhood classrooms. Early Education and Development, 34(5), 1234–1252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2107425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Neumann, M. M. (2022). Young children and digital technology: Impacts on early literacy development. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 20(3), 301–315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221090712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ong, D. P. (2025). Social presence in flexible online courses: Links to learning and student satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13823-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2021). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 635143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Zosh, J. M., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Whitebread, D. (2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Learning through play: A review of the evidence. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121620-115409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study