Instructional Strategies in the Digital Era: A Narrative Review of Trends and Implications for Student Satisfaction in Open and Distance Learning (ODL)

The rapid expansion of digital transformation has significantly reshaped higher education, positioning Open and Distance Learning (ODL) as a central mode of instructional delivery across institutions worldwide. While digital technologies have increased access and flexibility, student satisfaction in ODL environments remains inconsistent, highlighting the importance of effective teaching strategies and learner readiness. This study aims to examine the evolution of teaching strategies in digitally transformed ODL environments and to synthesise theoretical perspectives explaining how instructional practices influence student satisfaction. This study employed a narrative literature review design to synthesise recent research published between 2020 and 2025. A structured literature search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 26 selected studies that were analysed using thematic narrative synthesis. The analysis focused on four core instructional dimensions (course design, instructor competence, learning interaction, and feedback quality), alongside the contextual role of students’ digital literacy. The findings reveal that structured course design, strong instructor presence, meaningful interaction, and timely feedback consistently influence student satisfaction in ODL settings. In addition, students’ digital literacy emerged as a critical moderating factor that enhances engagement and determines how effectively learners benefit from instructional strategies. The integration of theoretical perspectives, including Transactional Distance Theory, the Community of Inquiry framework, Expectancy-Confirmation Theory, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, further explains how instructional mechanisms shape satisfaction outcomes in digitally mediated environments. Overall, this study concludes that student satisfaction in ODL is shaped by the alignment between pedagogical design, technological systems, and learner capabilities. These findings highlight the importance of adopting integrated instructional and institutional strategies to support sustainable and inclusive digital learning environments in higher education.

Teaching Strategies; Student Satisfaction; Open and Distance Learning (ODL); Digital Literacy; Higher Education

1. Achuthan, K., Kolil, V.K., Muthupalani, S., & Raman, R. (2024). Transactional distance theory in distance learning: Past, current, and future research trends. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), ep493. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating the success of e-learning systems: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Atan, M.A., Abdul Hamid, A.A., Zaini, N., Norwahi, N.A., & Jamil Azhar, S.B.H. (2023). Navigating higher education in Malaysia: lessons from the pandemic challenges in online learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10), 2095-2102. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i10/19111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of perceived learning outcomes and student satisfaction in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of E-Learning Education and Research, 7(3), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V.I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency distance learning in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bunsu, C., & Abd Halim, N.D. (2023). Perception and satisfaction among open and distance learning students at the Technological University of Malaysia. Information Technology and Learning Tools, 95(3), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v95i3.5151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: Shifting from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on student satisfaction and performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technology, 26(6), 6923-6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hashim, H., Mohamad, S.A., Che Hamzah, H., Halid, R.A., & Azer, I. (2023). The role of perceived usefulness and validity in influencing student satisfaction with online distance learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i2.22232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). A study of teachers' strategies to enhance student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ho, I.M.K., Cheong, K.Y., & Weldon, A. (2021). Predicting student satisfaction with emergency distance learning in higher education during COVID-19 using machine learning techniques. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0249423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hu, C., Wei, H., Zhou, R., & Ma, Y. (2024). A study on the influence of online course design on students' online learning satisfaction—The moderating effect of MOOC platform quality. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 2024-2257. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-2257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kaur, N., & Chowdhury, T.A. (2022). Dynamics and factors causing team satisfaction in open and distance learning collaborative writing class. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Teaching, 19. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Krishnan, A., Arumugam, P.V., Indiran, L., & Lei, J. (2023). A study on university students' perceptions of overall satisfaction among Malaysian Open and Distance Learning (ODL) students. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Progressive Development, 12(1), 1465-1477. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i1/16206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Law, K.L.S., Nesamalar Tharumaraj, J., & Si, J.C.E. (2025). Students' attitudes and motivations towards the effectiveness of Open Distance Learning (ODL) in Malaysian universities. JOIV: International Journal of Informatics Visualization, 9(2), 558. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.9.2.3404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Levinsson, H., Nilsson, A., Mårtensson, K., & Persson, S.D. (2024). Course design as a stronger predictor of student evaluations of quality and engagement than teacher evaluations. Higher Education, 88(5), 1997-2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01197-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Li, X., Odhiambo, F.A., & Ocansey, D.K.W. (2023). The impact of students' online learning experiences on their satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1095073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luo, P., Wang, C., Guo, F., & Luo, L. (2021). Factors influencing individuals' online rumor-spreading behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, Article 106968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106968 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). (2021). Evolution of e-Learning in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Maqableh, M., & Alia, M. (2021). Evaluation of undergraduate students' online learning under lockdown amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Online learning experiences and student satisfaction. Child and Youth Services Review, 128, Article 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2022). Developing a framework for online student satisfaction in higher education through a systematic research review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00355-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysian Education Development Plan 2015-2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Moore, MG (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of Distance Education (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Öztaş, S. (2023). Satisfaction level of undergraduate students towards distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 4(1), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2023.531.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNICEF Malaysia. (2023). Education 2030 in Malaysia: 5-Year National Progress Report on SDG 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. University of Waterloo, Queen’s University, & University of Toronto. (2026). Introduction to Community of Inquiry framework. https://www.saskoer.ca/hqoc/chapter/4-3-introduction-to-community-of-inquiry-framework/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward an integrated view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478 https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wade, J. (2021). Universities are starting to look very different. WIRED. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wei, C.Y., Sheau Wen, O., Fong Wei, D., Yeok Meng, N., & Kah Pin, C. (2023). Satisfaction with distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 38(1), 163-187. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2023.38.1.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Economic Forum. (2022). These three graphs show the global growth in online learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yan-Li, S., Jiang, N., Pamanee, K., & Sriyanto, J. (2022). Readiness and satisfaction of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic among students in four Asian countries. Journal of Archipelago Studies (JONUS), 7(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp245-269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yu, Z. (2021). The influence of gender, education level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study