Teaching With AI or Teaching Through AI? Investigating Teacher Agency among Moroccan Pre-Service EFL Teachers

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational settings has generated significant scholarly debate about its implications for teacher professionalism. This qualitative study explores how Moroccan pre-service EFL teachers at two teacher education institutions, ENS Rabat and ESEF Kénitra, perceive the impact of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Grammarly, and others on their pedagogical decision-making and professional autonomy. Drawing on Priestley et al.’s (2015) ecological model of teacher agency and Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis framework, data were collected from 42 purposively sampled participants, drawn from the wider target population of pre-service EFL teachers engaged in practicum-based training at Moroccan teacher education institutions (CRMEF, ENS, and ESEF centers), through an open-ended qualitative survey. Four major themes emerged from the analysis: (a) AI as a pedagogical co-pilot, (b) convenience versus critical engagement, (c) negotiated teacher agency, and (d) emerging professional identities in the AI era. The findings indicate that while AI enhances instructional efficiency and builds confidence among novice teachers, uncritical reliance on AI-generated content risks limiting opportunities for independent pedagogical reasoning and reflective practice. Crucially, participants did not perceive AI as eliminating teacher agency; rather, they described agency as continuously negotiated through technology-mediated interactions. The study advances a conceptual distinction between “teaching with AI”, whereby teachers employ AI as a supportive resource while retaining professional judgment, and “teaching through AI,” whereby instructional decisions are progressively delegated to algorithmic systems. Implications for AI literacy development and critical pedagogy within Moroccan teacher education programs are discussed. The article concludes by discussing implications for AI literacy development and critical pedagogy within Moroccan teacher education, and offers recommendations for teacher education curricula, institutional policy, and future research on AI-mediated professional development.

artificial intelligence, teacher agency, EFL/ELT, pre-service teachers, Morocco, teacher education, AI literacy

1. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4739-5323-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Gray, D. (Eds.). (2017). Collecting Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide to Textual, Media and Virtual Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Holmes, W., & Miao, F. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Unesco Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A bibliometric analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(3), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2023-0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Beginning and first-year language teachers’ readiness for the generative AI age. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M. & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers' trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Selwyn, N. (2024). On the Limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vorobyeva, K. I., Belous, S., Savchenko, N. V., Smirnova, L. M., Nikitina, S. A., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2025). Personalized learning through AI: Pedagogical approaches and critical insights. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), Article ep574. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Developing a Culturally Responsive Model for Assessing Writing in Moroccan EFL Secondary Classrooms