Technical Competency Enhancement Framework for Civil Engineers Towards Successful Public Projects Delivery in Malaysia : Strategists Influence Challenges

The process of applying project management standards to public sector construction projects is based on a rationalist conception that defines technical competence as an established set of predictable knowledge qualities. However, the lack of empirical data is found in the way civil engineers practice these qualities on the workplace surroundings, and especially in the public project context. Technical competency has long been recognised as one of the critical factors in determining the individual performance, but the research has taken little action in terms of establishing the key technical competencies that may be needed to successfully implement the public projects. Through the use of an established competency framework based on the human resource management theory, the study work empirically assesses the technical competencies of civil engineers at the different stages of the delivery of the public projects. It determines key issues which lead to the lack of technical competency, evaluates the consequences of these issues on project performance, and provides specific measures to boost technical competency. Through literature review and pilot study, a questionnaire survey on 359 respondents amongst the civil engineers who are directly involved in managing public project in Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR) Malaysia have been obtained and the analysis was conducts using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) to analyse quantitative data and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to analyse the structural relationships of the proposed framework. The results suggest that too much non-technical and administrative work are the most significant constraints on technical competency development and there is a strong preference towards work-integrated learning, on-site technical exposure and real-time project involvement found as the most effective strategies in improving technical competency. Therefore, this study aims at developing a model, which can be integrated to improve technical competency in civil engineers working on public projects in Malaysia. The results provide applicable knowledge to the organisations in the public sector, thus making it possible to plan and manage technical competency better and implement public projects in Malaysia in a more effective and successful way.

project management, technical competency, civil engineer, public project, Malaysia

1. Abdullah, N., & Alias, B. (2021). Digital transformation in Malaysian construction: BIMintegration and adoption challenges. Journal of Construction Innovation, 21(4), 512–528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahern, T., Lehtinen, J., & Martinsuo, M. (2023). Project complexity and management approaches: Balancing flexibility and control. International Journal of Project Management, 41(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahsan, K., Ho, M., & Khan, S. (2013). Recruiting project managers: A comparative analysis of competencies and recruitment signals from job advertisements. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2016). Critical technical competencies of public sector project managers in developing countries. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(S), 139–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2019). Determining critical success factors of project management practice: A conceptual framework. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alvarenga, J. C., Branco, R. R., Guedes, A. L. A., Soares, C. A. P., & Silva, W. S. (2020). The project manager core competencies to project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2018-0274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Assaf, S. A., & Al-Hejji, S. (2006). Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. BEM. (2020). Board of Engineers Malaysia: Continuing Professional Development (CPD) guidelines. Board of Engineers Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Board of Engineers Malaysia. (2021). Professional Competency Examination (PCE) guidelines. BEM. https://www.bem.org.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810840730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chan, D. W. M., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00039-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chileshe, N., Hosseini, M. R., Jepson, J., & Arashpour, M. (2020). Critical success factors for improving safety performance in construction projects: A global Delphi study. Safety Science, 129, 104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. CIDB. (2021). Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) review. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. CIDB. (2022). Construction Industry Competency Standards (CICS) Level 6: Construction Project Manager. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. CIDB. (2022). Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) 2021–2025. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Crawford, L., Nahmias, A. H., & de Groot, J. (2021). Competence for complex projects: A developmental framework. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Doloi, H., Sawhney, A., Iyer, K. C., & Rentala, S. (2012). Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Dubois, D. D., & Rothwell, W. J. (2004). Competency-based human resource management. HRD Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan (2021–2025): A prosperous, inclusive, sustainable Malaysia. Prime Minister’s Department. https://www.epu.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Engineers Australia. (2021). Stage 1 competency standard for professional engineers. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Gunduz, M., Nielsen, Y., & Ozdemir, M. (2013). Fuzzy assessment model to estimate the probability of delay in Turkish construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A scientometric analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ismail, Z., & Karim, M. (2020). Institutional capacity and competency development in Malaysia’s public works sector. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 11(9), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Japan Society of Civil Engineers. (2019). Framework for Continuing Professional Development of Civil Engineers. Japan Society of Civil Engineers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jarkas, A. M., & Haupt, T. C. (2015). Major construction risk factors considered by general contractors in Qatar. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 13(1), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-032014-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. JKR. (2022). Annual Report 2022. Public Works Department Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. JKR. (2025). Annual report of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia. Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (13th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. KICT. (2020). Smart Engineering Competency Guide. Korean Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kwak, Y. H., Walewski, J., Sleeper, D., & Sadatsafavi, H. (2014). What can we learn from the Hoover Dam project that influenced modern project management? International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ling, F. Y. Y., & Chan, S. L. (2020). Effect of competency on project performance in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., & Azis, A. A. A. (2020). Using RII and PLS-SEM to rank and validate the delay factors in Malaysian construction projects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 25(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2020.25.1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mohd-Rahim, F. A., Aziz, A. R. A., & Zainon, N. (2021). Competency requirements for sustainable construction project managers in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(6), 1555– 1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2020-0256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Nguyen, H. T., Luu, V. T., & Tran, D. H. (2021). Impact of project manager competencies on project success in Vietnam’s construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(9), 2574–2593. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2020-0637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Olanrewaju, A., & Abdul-Aziz, A. R. (2015). Building maintenance processes, principles, procedures, practices and strategies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Olanrewaju, A., & Tan, S. Y. (2020). Implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Malaysian construction industry: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2020-0176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Othman, A. A. E., Hassan, H., & Mohd, R. (2023). Assessing project management competencies in Malaysia’s construction industry: A focus on technical expertise. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(5), 1123–1142. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2022-0336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Project Management Institute (PMI). (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh edition. Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rahmat, A., & Latif, R. (2023). Effectiveness of CPD programmes for Malaysian engineers. Journal of Engineering Education and Practice, 14(1), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Saedah, S., Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. (2013). Design and Development Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Salleh, R., Bahauddin, A., & Mohamad, N. (2020). Public project delivery in Malaysia: A review of audit findings. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(7), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-02000234-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Shrestha, P. P., Burns, L. A., & Shields, D. R. (2020). Magnitude of construction cost and schedule overruns in public transportation projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2), 04019098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Silvius, A. J. G., & Schipper, R. (2020). Exploring sustainability in project management: A critical review and future research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Succar, B., & Kassem, M. (2015). Macro-BIM adoption: Conceptual structures. Automation in Construction, 57, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.04.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Tabassi, A. A., Ramli, M., & Bakar, A. H. A. (2016). Transformational leadership and teamwork improvement: The case of construction firms. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2015-0163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Tabassi, A. A., Roufechaei, K. M., Bakar, A. H. A., & Yusof, N. A. (2021). Linking team condition and team performance: A transformational leadership approach. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(2), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2019-0064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Toor, S. U. R., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). Beyond the “iron triangle”: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Turner, J. R. (2016). Gower handbook of project management (5th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. World Bank. (2020). Improving government project implementation: Lessons from Malaysia. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Yusof, M. N. M., & Jamaluddin, M. Z. (2023). Aligning engineering education with industry standards. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 12(4), 66–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Zainuddin, Z., Rahman, S., & Omar, H. (2022). Regulatory inconsistencies in engineering competency assessment. International Journal of Law and Built Environment, 14(2), 200–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Zwikael, O., & Meredith, J. (2022). Evaluating the success of a project and the performance of its leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(3), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3016915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach