Technical Efficiency and Production Constraints in Cotton Cultivation: An Empirical Analysis of Hybrid and Local Varieties in Kushtia, Bangladesh

This study investigates the technical efficiency and production constraints of hybrid and local cotton varieties in Kushtia district, Bangladesh, using primary survey data from 60 farmers (30 hybrid and 30 local). A Cobb–Douglas stochastic frontier production function was applied to estimate technical efficiency and identify determinants of inefficiency. Results indicate that hybrid cotton farmers achieved a mean technical efficiency of 92 percent, compared with 81 percent for local farmers, implying potential output gains of 8 and 19 percent, respectively, under existing input levels. For hybrid cotton, human labor, TSP, gypsum, and irrigation exerted significant positive effects on production, while urea showed a negative impact. Farm size, training, and farming experience were found to significantly reduce inefficiency. Local cotton farmers exhibited similar patterns, with human labor, TSP, and irrigation positively influencing yield. The analysis further identified key production constraints, including long cultivation duration (91.67 percent of farmers), low output prices (90 percent), insect infestations (83.33 percent), and adverse climatic conditions (75 percent). These findings suggest that targeted interventions—such as farmer training, improved resource management, expansion of farm size, and strategies to address systemic production constraints—can enhance cotton productivity and efficiency. Strengthening these areas could reduce Bangladesh’s heavy reliance on cotton imports and support the long-term sustainability of its textile sector.

Cotton production, technical efficiency

1. Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. J. (1977). Formulation and establishment of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bennett, R., Ismael, Y., Morse, S., & Shankar, B. (2004). Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: Impacts on economic performance and toxic load to the environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142(6), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859604004745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Biswas, P. R. (1992). An economic analysis of cotton production in some selected areas of Jessore District [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bangladesh Agricultural University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biswas, R., Molla, M. M. U., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Zonayet, M., & Castanho, R. A. (2022). Profitability analysis and input use efficiency of maize cultivation in selected areas of Bangladesh. Land, 12(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906814 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dristy, S. A., Dhar, A. R., & Uddin, M. T. (2024). Sustainable practices for cotton production in Bangladesh: Economic and environmental perspectives. Discover Agriculture, 2(1), 71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00071-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garbole, J. (2025). The role of Enset-based homegarden agroforestry in agrobiodiversity conservation and sustainable food production in the semiarid areas of Dugda dawa district, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101662 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Cotton Advisory Committee. (2013). Cotton statistics. ICAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. A. K., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical efficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2-3), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In T. C. Koopmans (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation (pp. 33-97). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Loganathan, R., Balasubramanian, R., Mani, K., & Gurunathan, S. (2009). Productivity and profitability impact of genetically modified crops: An economic analysis of Bt cotton cultivation in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22(2), 331-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Majumder, K. A., Ahmed, J. U., & Fatema, K. (2020). Comparative advantages of conservation agriculture practice in coastal areas of Chattogram Division: A productivity and profitability analysis. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 13(2), 29-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v13i230329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb‒Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mortuza, G. G. G. (2015). Quality cotton production for economic development of Bangladesh. The Reflactor, 4, 37-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nadiruzzaman, M., Rahman, M., & Pal, U. (2019). Climate resilient agriculture in Bangladesh: A value chain analysis of cotton. Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development (BARD). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nadiruzzaman, M., Rahman, M., Pal, U., Croxton, S., Rashid, M. B., Bahadur, A., & Huq, S. (2021). Impact of climate change on cotton production in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 13(2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nadiruzzaman, M., Rahman, M., Pal, U., Hossain, M. F., Uddin, M. F., & Islam, M. K. (2019). Climate Resilient Agriculture in Bangladesh: A Value Chain Analysis of Cotton. Action on Climate Today: Dhaka, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Odedokun, V.O. (2014). Economic Analysis of Cotton Production and Supply trend Estimation in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria. 244p. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Parameswaran, C., & Cayalvizhi, B. (2020). Fertilizers, BT technology, and insecticides contributed to 60%, 23%, and 17%, respectively to the increase in BT cotton yield: An analysis from 2000 to 2014 in India. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.081794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahman, S., Alam, M. J., & Hossain, S. T. (2013). Financial and economic profitability of selected crops in Bangladesh. National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Programme (NFPCSP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rahman, S., Islam, S. M. M., Prodhan, M. S. I., Hasan, M. M., & Khan, M. A. A. (2018). Productivity and profitability of improved versus existing cropping pattern in Kushtia region. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 43(4), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v43i4.39157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ramamoorthy, K. (1990). Economics of cotton production in India. In Cotton scenario in India, Souvenir (pp. 103-108). Cotton Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Reddy, R., Raju, G. V. T., & Janaiah, A. (1997). The comparative economics of cotton cultivation: A case study in Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Research ANGRAU, 25(1), 46-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Uddin, M. N., & Mortuza, G. (2015). Cotton production constraints and its prospects in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 1(2), 62-73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.18034/ijbmsr.v1i2.220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District