Technical Support Availability and Socio-Emotional Learning Competency on Research Capability of Teachers in Integrated Schools

Authors

May Princess T. Justol

Teacher II, Department of Education- Bukidnon (Philippines)

Dr. James L. Paglinawan

Associate Professor IV, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500018

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 204-218

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-25

Accepted: 2026-05-01

Published: 2026-05-21

Abstract

This research examined the research capability of teachers in integrated schools and its relationship with technical support availability and socio-emotional learning competency. It determined the levels of technical support, socio-emotional learning, and research capability across four dimensions: information retrieval, information management, communication and collaboration, and research application and ethics. It also explored the relationships among these variables and identified significant predictors of research capability. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed. The study was conducted in the four Districts of Quezon in the Division of Bukidnon during the school year 2025-2026. A total of three hundred four (304) teachers voluntarily participated in answering the research questionnaire. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis. Findings revealed that technical support availability, socio-emotional learning competency, and research capability were all at high levels. Both technical support and socio-emotional learning were significantly related to research capability, with socio-emotional learning demonstrating a stronger association. Regression analysis identified responsible decision-making, relationship skills, and responsiveness as significant predictors, collectively explaining a substantial portion of the variance in research capability. The study concludes that while technical support provides necessary external conditions for research engagement, socio-emotional competencies exert a greater influence on teachers’ research capability. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening both institutional support systems and teachers’ internal competencies to enhance research productivity and professional practice.

Keywords

responsible decision making, relationship skills, responsiveness, competence, reliability, social awareness

Downloads

References

1. Abella, J. Y., Cadorna, E. M., Taban, J. G., & Ramirez, L. V. (2024). An assessment of Filipino public school teachers’ research competence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anub, C. D. (2020). Senior high school teachers’ research competence and satisfaction with facilities and resources. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(4), 983–989. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.54.74 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (2018). A commentary on moral disengagement: Theoretical foundations and implications for research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(2), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bautista, M. C., & Dela Cruz, R. L. (2021). Research capabilities of basic education teachers: Basis for capacity-building program. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.xxxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Borgman, C. L. (2017). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brackett, M. A., Bailey, C. S., Hoffmann, J. D., & Simmons, D. N. (2019). RULER: A theory-driven, systemic approach to social, emotional, and academic learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brackett, M. A., Elbertson, N. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2019). Applying emotional intelligence in schools: SEL skills for educators and students. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. CASEL. (2020). SEL framework: What are the core competencies of SEL? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2020). Research methods in education (9th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL guide to schoolwide social and emotional learning. CASEL. https://casel.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Collie, R. J. (2021). Teachers’ social-emotional competence, well-being, and teaching quality: A review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09510-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2020). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Consortium for School Networking (CoSN). (2023). State of EdTech leadership: 2023 survey report. CoSN. https://www.cosn.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Datu, J. A. D., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2023). Filipino teachers’ social-emotional competencies and well-being: A structural equation modeling approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(4), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00686-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017: Research Management Guidelines. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/03/20/do-16-s-2017-research-management-guidelines/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) guidelines and research management framework. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). Information and Communications Technology (ICT) strategic plan 2022–2025. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Domingo, C. R. (2024). Exploring socio-emotional competence and teacher resilience in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 25(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2017). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Espinosa, M. P. (2023). Research competence and challenges of public school teachers in Region X: Implications for policy and practice. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 24(2), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fessakis, G., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2020). Teachers’ digital literacy and research skills for 21st-century learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5673–5688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10227-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Galarosa, R. T. (2023). Research capability of elementary school teachers: Basis for a proposed training program. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 8(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gebre, Z. A., Teklay, N. G., & Asgedom, A. A. (2025). Teachers’ socio-emotional competence and its effect on classroom engagement: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 20(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., García-Magariño, I., & Romero-Zaldivar, V. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research and teaching: A structural equation modeling study. Education Sciences, 13(7), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Head, A. J. (2017). Posing the million-dollar question: What happens when students do research? Project Information Literacy Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Huang, L. (2024). A systematic review of technology-enabled teacher professional development during COVID-19. Computers & Education, 197, 104823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2021). Findings from the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS) Teacher Panel. IEA. https://www.iea.nl [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2017). Research ethics for social scientists (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jennings, P. A., Brown, J. L., Frank, J. L., Doyle, S., Oh, Y., Davis, R., Rasheed, D., DeWeese, A., DeMauro, A. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2017). Impacts of the CARE for teachers program on teachers’ social and emotional competence and classroom interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Khalid, A., Abdullah, M. N., & Zainal, Z. (2021). The influence of research self-efficacy and institutional support on teachers’ research engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lagrio, R.G et.al 2022, Research Competence and Productivity Among School Heads and Teachers: Basis for District Research Capacity Building, Department of Education, Division of Palawan. https://www.academia.edu/84839757/Research_Competence_and_Productivity_Among_School_Heads_and_Teachers_Basis_for_District_Research_Capacity_Building [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lavy, S., & Naama-Ghanayim, E. (2020). Why care about caring? Linking teachers’ emotions, well-being, and professional identity to students’ emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Luna, A. N., & Ballado, R. S. (2025). Perceived research competence of senior high school research teachers in the Division of Northern Samar. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 58(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v58i12017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mingoa, T. R., Hernandez, K. J., & Paguio, D. C. (2024). Filipino teachers’ understanding and promotion of social-emotional learning and resilience: A qualitative case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education and Development, 13(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mornar, M. (2024). Teachers’ social and emotional competencies and their role in occupational well-being. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1397852. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1397852 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Napa, A,C et.al 2022, Enhancing Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Competencies among Education Students through the “Share a Book, Wake a Thought (SABWAT)” Activity, University of Batangas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v47i1.471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Technology in schools: Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/tech_schools/index.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2023: Teachers as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/talis-2023-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rubio, F., Suárez-Triana, A., & Colleagues. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research work: Development of an instrument from a PLS-SEM approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 9013–9030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11895-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Soriano, M. F., & Castro, J. B. (2022). Research attitudes and productivity of public-school teachers in Ilocos Sur. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Tagadiad, J. V., Granaderos, R. D., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2024). An assessment of school support systems shaping teachers’ research competence: Basis for a proposed research capability enhancement program. Advances in Research and Innovation, 2(4), 45–59. https://journals.e-palli.com/home/index.php/ari/article/view/2380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Tan S., Pineda, H. A., & Geverola, I. J. R. (2023). Examining competence in action research of basic education teachers in Cebu City, Philippines. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp202-230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Tang, S. Y. F., & Choy, D. (2019). Teachers’ research engagement: Bridging research and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 18(4), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09245-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2019). Scholarly reading and the value of academic library collections: Results of a study in six universities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2019.0017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Teo, T. (2017). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Theodorio, A. O. (2024). Examining the support required by educators for successful technology integration. Cogent Education, 11(1), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.xxxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive investigation of TPACK within pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 95, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. UNESCO. (2023). Strengthening social and emotional learning in teacher education: Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. UNICEF Philippines. (2024). Development of a socio-emotional skills assessment in the Philippines. Manila: UNICEF Philippines. https://www.unicef.org/philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. World Bank. (2020). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone, everywhere. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/realizing-future-of-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. World Bank. (2020). Remote learning, distance education and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A resource list. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles