Technology Adoption for Marine Fleet Safety in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria

Authors

Iyama, W.A.

Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Eneyo, I.S.

Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Ogolo, I.

Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Abere, T.E.

Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Akiagba, O.N.

Institute of Geosciences and Environmental Management, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300397

Subject Category: Technology

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 5523-5532

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-16

Accepted: 2026-03-21

Published: 2026-04-11

Abstract

The Niger Delta region of Nigeria is a critical hub for marine transport and oil exploration, with numerous vessels operating in its waterways. However, ensuring safety amidst complex operations and security challenges remains a concern. This study assesses the adoption of technology for enhancing marine fleet safety in the Niger Delta. The research employed a mixed-methods approach which includes surveys, interviews, and observational assessments as to evaluate the current state of technology adoption, identify barriers, and provide recommendations for improvement. This study employed the use of percentages, frequencies, charts, inferential statistics to illustrate trends. The study identified some barriers to technology adoption which included high costs, lack of infrastructure, limited awareness of benefits, and inadequate regulatory frameworks. The Findings reveal constrained adoption of advanced safety tools (78%), with barriers including high costs (72%), lack of infrastructure and limited awareness of benefits (60%). Quantitative complements involved survey results where 70% of respondents reported using some form of safety technology; top barriers such as cost (85%), lack of improved technology and infrastructure (76%), and training-technology enhancement through job creation (62%) while statistical analysis depicts correlation between technology adoption and reduced accident rates (r = 0.65, p < 0.05) as well as regression analysis in which technology adoption predicts safety performance (β = 0.42, p < 0.01). The study also highlights the potential benefits of technology adoption (67% by the control group), including reduced accidents, enhanced emergency response, and improved overall safety. The use of artificial intelligence AI and robotics were absent and not encouraged (90%) by the operators. Therefore, modern technology adoption was not supported (75%) by same operators except the regulators and non-operators. The research recommends increased investment in safety technology and training for crew members, collaboration between regulatory agencies and operators to promote technology adoption, and the implementation of policies to support technology integration. The study suggests the provision of incentives for adoption and the focus on specific needs of small-scale operators. This study exposes the current low state of technology adoption for marine fleet safety in the Niger Delta and offers practical recommendations for stakeholders to enhance safety and reduce risks in the region's marine transport sector.

Keywords

Technology adoption, marine safety, Niger Delta

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akpan, I. J., Nwaogazie, I.L. & Chinemerem, P. (2022). “Quantitative Risk Assessment of Naval Vessels Operating in Niger Delta Waterways Using Fault Tree Analysis”. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 41 (42), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2022/v41i424000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrei, N., & Scarlat, C. (2024). Marine Applications: The Future of Autonomous Maritime Transportation and Logistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baig, M.Z., Lagdami, K., & Mejia, M.Q. (2024). Enhancing maritime safety: A comprehensive review of challenges and opportunities in the domestic ferry sector. Maritime Technology and Research, 6(3), 268911. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.268911. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dawson, D. (2020). Barriers to technology adoption in the maritime industry. Journal of Maritime Research, 22(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dogancay, K.; Tu, Z.; Ibal, G. (2021). Research into Vessel Behaviour Pattern Recognition in the Maritime Domain: Past, Present and Future. Digit. Signal Process., 119, 103191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. ETMT (2026). Emerging Trends in Maritime Technology: What to Expect. (2026). Voyage X AI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gülmez, Y. (2025). "Enhancing Cybersecurity in Marine Vessels: Integrating Artificial Neural Networks with Inertial Navigation Systems for Resilience Against GPS Cyber-Attacks". [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ikpogu, N. M. (2021). "Barriers to Technology Adoption Among Maritime Industry Stakeholders in Nigeria". Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. 10805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/10805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. IMO (2019). International Maritime Organization. Maritime safety and security. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. MIFT (2026). "The Rise of Autonomous Vessels in 2026: Maritime Innovation & Future Trends" [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Miller, T., Durlik, I., Kostecka, E., Sokołowska, S., Kozlovska, P., & Zwolak, R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Maritime Cybersecurity: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Threat Detection and Risk Mitigation Strategies. Electronics, 14(9), 1844; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14091844 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MIT (2026). Maritime Industry Transforms with AI and IoT: A New Era of Efficiency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. NBS (2020). National Bureau of Statistics. Nigeria's maritime trade statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Osinowo, O. O. (2018). Enhancing maritime safety through technology adoption. Journal of Navigation, 71(3), 537-550. https//doi: 10.1017/S037346331700081X. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tejwani, D. (2024). Navigating the Future: How AI, big data, and autonomous systems are reshaping maritime transport. UNCTAD Transport and Trade Facilitation Newsletter, (103). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. TRAV (2026). The Rise of Autonomous Vessels in 2026: Maritime Innovation & Future Trends. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles