The African Child as a Technological Citizen

This paper examines the philosophical, political, and pedagogical foundations for conceptualizing the African child as a technological citizen. It proposes that the African child is not merely a beneficiary of technological advancement but a potential architect of Africa’s technological future. Drawing from African Technological Nationalism, Science and Technology Studies (STS), and postcolonial pedagogy, the paper advances a theory of childhood that imbricates innovation, speculative imagination, and civic scientific agency. The CHILD-AUTHOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CADP) is presented as a pioneering institutional response to this reconceptualization. The paper situates the African child’s technological citizenship within broader debates in the philosophy of technology, global epistemic justice, and educational reform. It interrogates the colonial residue in African science and technology education, while proposing new institutional pathways for embedding speculative authorship and invention literacy into early childhood development. The work also critically engages with the political economy of African development, showing how child-centered technological citizenship can serve as a counter-hegemonic force against technological dependence. In doing so, it deepens the theoretical underpinnings of African Technological Nationalism while proposing practical mechanisms for its institutionalization through pedagogy, literary creation, and public policy.

African Child, Technological Citizenship, Postcolonial Pedagogy, Science

1. African Union (AU). (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. Addis Ababa: African Union Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akinwale, A. A. (2010). Technological development in Nigeria: The Nigerian machine tools industry experience. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(5), 129-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human-technology relations. In H. Harbers (Ed.), Inside the politics of technology (pp. 69–84). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. David, N. (1998). The Archaeology of African Metallurgy. Journal of Archaeological Research, 6(2), 147–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deuze, M. (2007). Media Work. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guston, D. (2014). Understanding Anticipatory Governance. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harding, S. (1998). Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kim, D. (2005). The development of Korean higher education in the 20th century. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(5), 597–614. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Leach, M., & Fairhead, J. (2002). Science, policy and uncertainty: The case of the MRC/UVRI trial on HIV and breastfeeding in Uganda. Africa, 72(1), 83–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mazrui, A. (1997). The African renaissance: A triple legacy of skills, values and gender. Development Policy Management Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159–181. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nayar, P. K. (2010). An Introduction to New Media and Cybercultures. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nsamenang, A. B. (1992). Human Development in Cultural Context: A Third World Perspective. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nwosu, T. I. (2025). Making World Leaders Out of African Children: The CADP Vision. Internal Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nyabola, N. (2018). Digital Democracy, Analogue Politics: How the Internet Era is Transforming Politics in Kenya. Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Okorafor, N. (2019). Africanfuturism Defined. [Blog post]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Simondon, G. (1958). Du Mode d’Existence des Objets Techniques. Aubier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vansina, J. (1985). Oral Tradition as History. University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Aristotelian Ethics and Moral Development: A Critical Evaluation
• Decolonising Africa’s Higher Education against violence and social injustices.
• Mathematics as Ontological–Cognitive Participation: Reconstructing Ethical and Metaphysical Foundations within a Humanized Mathematical Universe
• Reason–Emotion Integration in the Context of Artificial Intelligence: The Implications of Aristotle’s Conception of Happiness for Youth Moral Education
• Buddhist and Hindu Reductionism in Understanding the Universe