The Art of Compromise: Door-in-the-Face Strategy in Securing Financial Assistance from Family Members

The Door-in-the-Face (DITF) technique, a cornerstone of compliance research, employs an initial exaggerated request anticipated to be rejected, followed by a more modest true request, capitalizing on reciprocity norms and perceptual contrast. This single-case naturalistic field experiment examines DITF efficacy within familial financial negotiations via WhatsApp, a context underexplored in recent digital literature. Objectives include applying DITF principles—compromise perception, reciprocity, and contrast—to elevate compliance rates from a projected 0% to higher acceptance. Findings showed that the target (subject's brother) rejected RM100 for a fabricated "traffic fine" but acquiesced to RM50 subsequently, yielding 100% compliance on the target request which affirm DITF robustness and underscore relational trust as a key moderator in close-knit dyads using digital channels. Theoretical contributions refine social influence models, practical implications span family dynamics, digital negotiation training and everyday persuasion.

Door-in-the-Face, compliance, social influence, reciprocity norms, family relationships, WhatsApp

1. Abdullah, N., & Tan, S. L. (2022). Filial piety and compliance in Malaysian families: A social influence perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, F. F. A. (2024). The effectiveness of WhatsApp in disseminating work-related information. Universiti Teknologi MARA. https://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45378/[eprints.uptm.edu] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (2024). Social psychology (14th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, D. A. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fennis, B. M., & Janssen, L. (2021). Door-in-the-face techniques and guilt: A meta-analytic review. Social Influence, 16(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1976789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fennis, B. M., Das, E. H. H. J., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2011). Sequential request strategies in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Li, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Cultural moderators of door-in-the-face in prosocial requests: Evidence from East Asian families. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. O'Keefe, D. J., & Wang, X. (2024). Negative affect related to door-in-the-face strategy. Psychological Reports. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38146075/[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being