The Corporate–Individual ROI Gap: Why Returning Expatriates Leave Despite Successful Assignments

Authors

Samuel Alaba Omopintemi

University of Gloucestershire (YORK Yorkshire United Kingdom)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800749

Subject Category: Human Resource Management

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 11039-11052

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-30

Accepted: 2026-09-04

Published: 2026-09-17

Abstract

International assignments represent expensive and time-consuming endeavours for multinational enterprises (MNEs). However, many repatriated expatriates (REs) depart from the organisation within one to two years after returning, even when the assignment was deemed successful by typical standards. This apparent paradox underpins this conceptual paper, which suggests that expatriate return on investment (ROI) comprises two separate and often diverging accounts: a corporate ROI, calculated based on cost recovery, knowledge transfer, and strategic capability development; and an individual ROI, assessed by the returnee in terms of career capital, status, and psychological contract fulfilment. Building on psychological contract theory (Rousseau, 1989, 1995) alongside career capital and boundaryless career theory (DeFillippi & Arthur, 1994; Dickmann & Harris, 2005), the paper integrates existing research on expatriate ROI (McNulty & Tharenou, 2004; McNulty et al., 2013), repatriate turnover (Kraimer et al., 2012; Stroh et al., 1998), and repatriate knowledge transfer (Lazarova & Tarique, 2005). It introduces the Dual-Ledger ROI Divergence Model, which explains post-assignment attrition as a consequence of the increasing divergence between these ledgers, rather than of either ledger in isolation. The analysis then focuses on Nigeria, where the "Japa–Japada" migration cycle, a significant skilled-labour drain, and poorly institutionalised repatriation practices make the ROI gap for both companies and individuals particularly critical for organisational competitiveness and national progress. The paper's novelty lies in reframing repatriate turnover as a relational-accounting problem rather than a readjustment or satisfaction problem, and in situating this reframing within an emerging-economy setting that the extant literature has largely overlooked. The paper closes with a theory-informed research agenda and practical recommendations for Nigerian and multinational employers seeking to narrow the gap and retain returnee talent.

Keywords

expatriate return on investment, repatriation, psychological contract, career capital, employee turnover, Nigeria

Downloads

References

1. Allianz Care. (2025). How to effectively retain expatriates? Allianz Partners. https://www.allianzcare.com/en/employers/business-hub/hr-blogs/how-to-effectively-retain-expatriates.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Introduction: The boundaryless career as a new employment principle. In M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organisational era (pp. 3–20). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Breitenmoser, A., & Bader, B. (2016). Repatriation outcomes affecting corporate ROI: A critical review and future agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 66(3), 195–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-016-0119-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Morley, M. J. (2007). Changing patterns of global staffing in the multinational enterprise: Challenges to the conventional expatriate assignment and emerging alternatives. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.02.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 15(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dickmann, M., & Harris, H. (2005). Developing career capital for global careers: The role of international assignments. Journal of World Business, 40(4), 399–408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.08.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Insurance. (2026). Expat repatriation: How to support employees returning home. https://www.internationalinsurance.com/global-mobility/expat-repatriation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Isiaka, O. S. (2025). Strategic human resource management and brain drain in Nigeria: An empirical study of retention practices and workforce mobility (2020–2024). Innovation Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 7(2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.v7i2.313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kraimer, M. L., Shaffer, M. A., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). The influence of expatriate and repatriate experiences on career advancement and repatriate retention. Human Resource Management, 48(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kraimer, M. L., Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D. A., & Ren, H. (2012). No place like home? An identity strain perspective on repatriate turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lawal, L., Lawal, A. O., Amosu, O. P., Muhammad-Olodo, A. O., Abdulrasheed, N., Abdullah, K., Kuza, P. B., Aborode, A. T., Adebisi, Y. A., Kareem, A. A., Aliu, A., Elelu, T. M., & Murwira, T. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and health workforce brain drain in Nigeria. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), Article 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01789-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lazarova, M., & Cerdin, J.-L. (2007). Revisiting repatriation concerns: Organisational support versus career and contextual influences. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 404–429. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lazarova, M., & Tarique, I. (2005). Knowledge transfer upon repatriation. Journal of World Business, 40(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.08.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. McNulty, Y., & De Cieri, H. (2011). Global mobility in the 21st century: Conceptualising expatriate return on investment in global firms. Management International Review, 51(6), 897–919. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0102-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McNulty, Y., De Cieri, H., & Hutchings, K. (2013). Expatriate return on investment in the Asia Pacific: An empirical study of individual ROI versus corporate ROI. Journal of World Business, 48(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. McNulty, Y., & Tharenou, P. (2004). Expatriate return on investment: A definition and antecedents. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 34(3), 68–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2004.11043710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mehreen, H., Rammal, H. G., Schulenkorf, N., & Hassanli, N. (2025). "Homeward bound": A systematic review of the repatriation literature. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 55(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2024.2390789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Perera, H. K., Chew, E. Y. T., & Nielsen, I. (2017). A psychological contract perspective of expatriate failure. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organisations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organisations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Stroh, L. K., Gregersen, H. B., & Black, J. S. (1998). Closing the gap: Expectations versus reality among repatriates. Journal of World Business, 33(2), 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(98)90003-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Szkudlarek, B. (2010). Reentry—A review of the literature. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.06.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tharenou, P., & Caulfield, N. (2010). Will I stay or will I go? Explaining repatriation by self-initiated expatriates. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1009–1028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. TheCable. (2025, October 13). Turning Japan into Africa's true giant. https://www.thecable.ng/turning-japa-nation-into-africas-true-giant/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Thomas, D., Li, Y., Ukwuoma, C. C., & Dossa, J. (2025). The "Japa-Japada" construct: A theoretical framework for exploring the recent medical brain drain scourge in Sub-Saharan Africa and the potential medical reverse brain drain. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 107, Article 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wang, X., Wang, S., & Zhu, M. (2023). Employment relationships of Chinese expatriates: A multi-focal perspective on the psychological contract. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 945292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.945292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. World Bank. (2024). Migration and development brief: Remittances remain resilient but likely to slow. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles