The Cultural Significance of Khmer Cuisine in Tra Vinh: Classification, Identification, and Transformations in the Context of Globalization

Khmer cuisine in Tra Vinh embodies not only the cultural values, indigenous knowledge, and agrarian beliefs of the Khmer community in Southern Vietnam, but also serves as a symbolic component of regional cultural identity. From the perspective of cultural studies, this paper aims to classify, identify, and interpret the distinctive characteristics of Khmer cuisine in Tra Vinh through the interrelation among human beings, environment, and cultural practice. Furthermore, the study explores the transformations of Khmer culinary traditions amid globalization and contemporary cultural exchange. These transformations reveal both the dynamic adaptability of the community to socio-economic changes and the emerging challenges in safeguarding and promoting intangible cultural heritage in the integration era. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of Khmer culinary culture as a specific cultural code, while suggesting interdisciplinary approaches to the study of Southern Vietnamese food culture today.

Khmer cuisine; Southern Vietnamese culture; cultural identity; globalization

1. Đào Chuông. (2019). Ẩm thực - Lễ hội dân gian Khmer Kiên Giang. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Hội nhà văn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bùi Chí Thanh. (2018). Văn hóa ẩm thực một số dân tộc tỉnh Hòa Bình. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Văn học. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Nguyễn Diễm Phúc. (2022). Văn hóa ẩm thực người Việt Tây Nam Bộ trong phát triển du lịch Vĩnh Long. Luận án tiến sĩ Trường Đại học Trà Vinh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dương Mỹ Pha. (2014). Đặc sản ẩm thực Trà Vinh dưới góc nhìn văn hóa. Trà Vinh: Luận văn thạc sĩ, Trường Đại học Trà Vinh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Sơn Cao Thắng. (2024). Tri thức dân gian. Trà vinh: khxh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Tran, D. D., Hoang, L. P., & Tran, T. A. (2024). Farmers’ livelihood and adaptation in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Current practices and policy implications. The Mekong River Basin – Ecohydrological Complexity from Catchment to Coast, pp. 527-558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-90814-6.00007-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Scott, J. (2000). Rational Choice Theory. In G. Browning, A. Halcli, & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present (pp. 126-138). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218310.n9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Steward, J. (2016). 1. The Concept and Method of Cultural Ecology. In N. Haenn, A. Harnish & R. Wilk (Ed.), The Environment in Anthropology, Second Edition: A Reader in Ecology, Culture, and Sustainable Living (2nd ed., pp. 12-17). New York University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479862689.003.0005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Popular Culture on Filipino Millennials: An Assessment Across Food, Fashion, Entertainment, and Beauty Products
• Narrating the Self and Constructing History: A Biography Appreciation Theory Analysis of Gandhi, Chaplin, and Hitler
• Food and Culture in Kashmiri Writings
• When East Meets West: Cross-Cultural Challenges in a Tourist’s Guide to Love
• Cultural Mapping of Movable and Immovable Tangible Cultural Properties of Morong, Bataan: Basis for the Development of Information, Education, and Communication Materials