The Designation of Constitutional Judges in Cameroon: Between Constitutional Legality and a Lack of Independence

Authors

Alama Ondoua Loic

Faculty of Legal and Political Sciences, Department of Public Law, University of Ebolowa (Cameroon)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600962

Subject Category: Political Science

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 13647-13661

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-11

Accepted: 2026-06-16

Published: 2026-07-09

Abstract

The Designation of constitutional judges is a major determinant of the independence of constitutional adjudication, although it does not, by itself, exhaust the guarantees required for such independence. This article offers a renewed reading of the Cameroonian system by moving beyond an analysis focused exclusively on presidential influence. It combines legal, historical-institutional, and comparative methods to examine, first, the historical and political factors that shaped the institutional architecture introduced in 1996 and, second, the lessons offered by four reference models: Benin, South Africa, France, and Germany. The study shows that the pluralistic selection framework provided by Article 51 of the Cameroonian Constitution remains limited by three cumulative factors: the intervention of the President of the Republic in the formal act appointing all members, the institutional dependence of the selecting bodies, and the persistence of a political culture of centralisation. The delay of more than twenty years between the constitutional establishment of the Council in 1996 and its effective installation in 2018 further demonstrates that independence depends not only on constitutional formulas, but also on the political will to make them effective. The comparative analysis highlights several techniques capable of mitigating the risks of institutional capture: constitutionally specified professional criteria, internal election of the head of the court, independent shortlisting, public hearings, parliamentary scrutiny, and qualified majorities. The article does not advocate the mechanical transplantation of such models. Rather, it argues for a contextualised reform: reducing presidential control over the final stage of the Designation process, strengthening the autonomy of the Higher Judicial Council, publicising candidacies, imposing stricter incompatibility rules, and ensuring the consensual selection of the President of the Constitutional Council. The independence of constitutional justice thus appears as the product of convergent legal arrangements, political practice, and institutional culture.

Keywords

Constitutional Judge; Constitutional Council; Cameroon; Selection and Designation; Judicial Independence; Comparative Constitutional Law; Presidentialism; Rule of Law.

Downloads

References

1. Constitutional and legislative instruments [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Constitution of the Republic of Cameroon, Law No. 96/06 of 18 January 1996 revising the Constitution of 2 June 1972, as amended by Law No. 2008/001 of 14 April 2008, arts. 37, 46, 50, and 51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Law No. 82/14 of 26 November 1982 to lay down the organisation and functioning of the Higher Judicial Council, as amended by Law No. 89/16 of 28 July 1989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Law No. 2004/004 of 21 April 2004 to lay down the organisation and functioning of the Constitutional Council, as amended by Law No. 2012/015 of 21 December 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Law No. 2004/005 of 21 April 2004 to lay down the status of members of the Constitutional Council, as amended by Law No. 2012/016 of 21 December 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Decree No. 2018/105 of 7 February 2018 appointing members of the Constitutional Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Decree No. 2018/106 of 7 February 2018 appointing the President of the Constitutional Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Constitution of the Republic of Benin of 11 December 1990, as revised by Law No. 2019-40 of 7 November 2019, arts. 115 and 116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Constitution of the Republic of Senegal, art. 89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s. 174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Constitution of the French Republic of 4 October 1958, arts. 13 and 56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz (BVerfGG), §§ 5-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Case law and institutional documents [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Constitutional Council of Cameroon, Decision No. 001/CC/2018 of 20 October 2018 concerning litigation arising from the presidential election. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Constitutional Council of Senegal, “How is the Constitutional Council composed?”, institutional website, accessed June 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Constitutional Court of South Africa, “Judicial Service Commission Designations process”, institutional website, accessed June 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Secondary sources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. FOMBAD, Charles Manga, “The New Cameroonian Constitutional Council in a Comparative Perspective: Progress or Retrogression?”, Journal of African Law, vol. 42, no. 2, 1998, pp. 172-186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. FOMBAD, Charles Manga, “The Separation of Powers and Constitutionalism in Africa”, African Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2011, pp. 85-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. KAMTO, Maurice, Pouvoir et droit en Afrique noire [Power and Law in Black Africa], Paris, LGDJ, 1987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. LOADA, Augustin, “Justice constitutionnelle et démocratie en Afrique : entre idéal et réalité” [Constitutional Justice and Democracy in Africa: Between Ideal and Reality], Revue internationale de droit comparé, vol. 58, no. 1, 2006, pp. 139-170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. MBAKU, John Mukum, “Judicial Independence, Constitutionalism and Governance in Cameroon”, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, vol. 1, 2014, pp. 357-391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. ROUSSEAU, Dominique, Droit du contentieux constitutionnel [Constitutional Litigation Law], 11th ed., Paris, LGDJ, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles